Dem C'tees Hold Financial Advantage, But GOP C'tees Catching Up

The numbers are in and -- gasp -- for just about the first time this cycle the Republican committees have begun to start catching up with their Democratic rivals. Take a look:

CommitteeJanuary ReceiptsJanuary DisbursementsJanuary Cash-on-HandJanuary Debts & Obligations
DSCC$3,946,980$2,874,148$30,476,123$1,000,000
NRSC (est.)$3,500,000$2,300,000$13,200,000$0
DCCC$3,724,281.85$3,326,426.10$35,493,233.64$1,678,081.49
NRCC$3,787,558.10$2,855,662.72$6,410,150.13$2,300,000
DNC$5,760,579.51$5,702,080.74$3,019,303.76$2,500,000.00
RNC$11,833,196.33$7,417,582.69$21,768,080.75$0
Total
Democrats
$13,431,841.36$11,902,654.84$68,988,660.40$5,178,081.49
Total
Republicans
$19,120,754.43$12,573,245.41$41,378,230.88$2,300,000

At this point, when debts and obligations are taken into account (because that does matter), the Democratic committees hold roughly a $24.7 million lead over their GOP counterparts. That amounts to an advantage of 63.3 percent -- lower than the figure in the 90s or above seen earlier this cycle, but nonetheless a daunting figure. The Republican committees were able to climb back by over $5 million in January, largely on the shoulders of the Republican National Committee, which is enjoying the largesse of GOP donors who are unimpressed by their presidential candidates but nonetheless want to contribute to their cause.

It's also worth adding this: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton raised roughly $50 million combined in January, compared to the under $16 million brought in by John McCain and Mike Huckabee combined last month. When you tack those figures on to the numbers for the committees above, you get the sense that the Democrats are not in fact slipping relative to the Republicans in terms of fundraising but, rather, Democratic money is just shifting (presumably and hopefully in a temporary manner) from the committees to the candidates.



Display:


Limits (none / 0)

I'd expect the Democratic advantage (if one persists) to be less when comparing committees than when comparing candidates because the individual contribution limits are more than 10 times higher for giving to committees ($28,500 compared with $2,300), so small numbers of rich donors can make a bigger difference.


DC Drinking LiberallyDC for Democracy

by KCinDC on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 04:39:08 PM EST

Expect this to continue because of FISA (none / 0)

Frankly, I'm ONLY giving to individual candidates, because I will not tolerate my dollars going to Congresspeople who failed to oppose FISA and Amnesty. Period. As someone said: Not a dime until you grow a spine.


by mattw on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 04:40:08 PM EST

GOP outraised Dems in January (none / 0)

This is a bad omen, to say the least.


by mikelow1885 on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 05:09:28 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.