because Clinton will not get the nomination.  Furthermore, I don't think Americans may be all that taken with the idea that pretty young women have a duty to be donning combat boots.  Only a goofy liberal would even imagine this to be an issue.

Her mother didn't based her decision on the best available evidence. She didn't even read the evidence. She trusted the Bush administration's assertions. That's far from the best available evidence. It's nice to know that I'm a psychic though since I knew it was all bullshit. That'll come in handy.

Well I might not be a psychic come to think of it since I based my decision on what folks who weren't in the Bush administration were saying. That was the best available evidence.

This family and the truth aren't good friends.

Chelsea is not running for president.  Hillary is.

What happened with Iraq was a result of Bush not listening to the Senate when they asked for diplomacy first.

Chelsea Clinton is now fair game for criticism. She did it to herself by putting herself out as a surrogate for her mother's campaign.

It doesn't mean, however, that the electorate will be receptive to such criticism, only that she is fair game to criticize.

Once in the Senate, his fiery speech was retired.  Once in the Senate, he voted time and again to fund a war he supposedly opposed.  Once in the Senate, Obama said he did not know how he would have voted had he actually been in the Senate.  Once in the Senate, Obama had the opportunity to vocally call for an end to the war, and did not.  He could have taken to the floor of the Senate during all those votes on funding, and decried the war.  He did not.  His silence reminds me of all those "present" votes.  And where was he during the vote on Iran, for which he now has the audacity to criticize Clinton?

Do you want a president who stands up for his beliefs, even when it's difficult and challenging?  Or do you want a president who goes missing when it's decision time?

Hillary's vote on Iraq reflected the sentiment of her constiuents in NY, where most of the 9/11 victims lived.  Had Obama been in her shoes, do you really think he would have stood up in opposition?  I don't believe so.

Well, Hillary's office seemed to know that there was a vote on Iran, and she showed up for it.  Frankly, it just seems lame to say you did not know about the vote.  But then again, organizational skills are not his strong suit, we've been told.

that many people believe.  You should also note, fetboy, that a majority of the American people, including many of the people who are now attacking her for her vote, ALSO SUPPORTED THE WAR!  Hillary voted based on the available intelligence at the time.  A majority of Democrats in the Senate voted for the resolution.  Hillary along with the rest of the American people was misled by the Bush Administration.  She should not be rebuked for this vote.

Also, I firmly believe that had Obama been in the Senate at the time of the vote, he would have voted for the resolution, too.

My point is....Obama could have put his highly effective oratory skills to the highest use by making anti-war speeches in the Senate, once he got there.  What good is the art of rhetoric if a politician does not use them when it's most important?  He had a chance to lead.  He did not.

She had far more information available to her than the general public. She didn't look at any of it. She just listened to the propaganda.

Riot inciting? Comedy. In a twisted way I hope HRC gets the nomination so you can see what you have wrought.

the questioner told her her mom killed a million people in the question.

in this circumstance, her answer was fine. leave Chelsea alone!!!

Comedy! Thanks for the levity. Dead soldiers and lying politicians is a bit depressing.

neither Clinton nor Obama have much to be proud of.  In a position where a real leader could have made a difference by eloquently persuading fellow Democrats to make a stand and curtail the funding and bring the troops home, both of them capitulated like most other Democrats.  Unfortunately, any Democrats who had the courage to face down the Bush White House, were quickly marginalized by the media, leaving us with the sad choices we have today.

I don't see anything wrong with what Chelsea said.  Politics is not a tea party.  She's allowed to respond to an Obama plant in a strong manner - in fact, I'm impressed that she did.  And it's incredibly easy to take a comment out of context and vilify it.  Chelsea Clinton is not running - her mother is.  

As for Hillary apologizing for her Iraq War vote, check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjUebX01p NY

Pat Buchanan (against the Iraq War from the beginning) actually has the right idea (listen until the end).