Dems' Generic Cong. Ballot Numbers Better than in Nov. '06

With Republicans facing a near-record number of retirements and the Democratic campaign committees holding roughly a $30 million advantage in cash-on-hand over the Republican campaign committees when debts and obligations are taken into account, you might think that things couldn't get worse for the GOP in its efforts to stem their losses in congressional elections this fall. But take a look at the latest generic congressional ballot numbers from Gallup:

The Republican Party last carried a majority of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2004, and Gallup polling conducted in the days preceding the election that year found 47% of likely voters planning to vote for the Republican candidate in their district. In 2006, with their final pre-election support at 44% of likely voters, the Republicans lost control of Congress. Today, even fewer likely voters say they will vote Republican.

According to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted Feb. 8-10, 2008, only 41% of adults likely to vote this November say they would support the Republican candidate running in their congressional district. Fifty-five percent say they would vote for the Democratic candidate.

Note that the Gallup generic congressional ballot question has been close to the mark in the past, most recently correctly pegging the Democrats' 7-point victory in the nationwide popular vote for the House of Representatives in November 2006. That, of course, is not to say that the Democrats are destined to win by an even larger margin in 2008 than they did in 2006. The Democrats' lead in 2006 according to Gallup went from nothing in September to 23 points in October to 7 points in 2006, so there's clearly room for fluctuation. Perhaps the poll even finds more movement than actually exists. That said, with almost all signs still pointing downward for congressional Republicans, this poll does not by any means seem out of whack.



Display:


Re: Generic versus one party control (none / 0)

Is there any polling about how the top of the ticket (the Presidential nominee) will influence the generics? Meaning are people more interested in spliting the ticket or are they less concerned about the issue? In other words, can the GOP exploit this sort of concern?


by bruh21 on Sat Feb 16, 2008 at 03:06:10 PM EST

Re: Generic versus one party control (none / 0)

Don't the messages of local candidates tend to coalesce around those of the presidential candidates?  My point being, if the message of one presidential candidate resonates, while the other doesn't, and the local candidates echo the messages of their respective candidates, then it would seem that the presidential candidate could help/hinder the local candidate.  To say nothing of added turnout that might be attributed to the presidential elections.


by rfahey22 on Sat Feb 16, 2008 at 03:10:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Generic versus one party control (none / 0)

That's what I getting at. How does these general numbers factor into the reality that unlike 2006 this is a presidential election year as well. I don't have an answer to what you ask or what I ask- just notice that there seems to be a lack of placing the numbers in context of greater political landscape and was curious what this has meant in the past and what it may mean this time,a nd whether anyone is polling this.


by bruh21 on Sat Feb 16, 2008 at 03:15:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dems' Generic Cong. Ballot Numbers (none / 0)

I realize this is MYDD, but Gallup had another interesting poll out today.  The current tracking poll shows Obama 49 and Clinton 42. It's the first statistically significant national lead he's had according to the Gallup poll. I doubt that would make front page on MYDD, but I thought there would be a few people who would find it interesting.


by godemsin08 on Sat Feb 16, 2008 at 03:17:59 PM EST

Re: Dems' Generic Cong. Ballot Numbers Better than (none / 0)

The last I heard there were 29 Republican retirements from congress.  Retirements had a lot to do with the 1994 win by Republicans.  It may well have been the biggest factor.  The much ballyhooed Contract With America didn't come out until October, which makes it unlikely that it had the influence it has been given in retrospect.  The economy was also a deciding factor that year, as was the backlash against the Clinton overhaul of taxes the previous year.  I wrote explanations of most of that here. Barney Frank mentioned the tax makeover backlash here.


by Mike Pridmore on Sat Feb 16, 2008 at 04:07:01 PM EST

Re: Dems' Generic Cong. Ballot Numbers Better than (none / 0)

At this point, the Democrats winning only 10 seats would be seen as a disappointment. I don't think they will match their gains from 2006, but that isn't out of the question given results like this (and the huge edge in money).


by C S Strowbridge on Sun Feb 17, 2008 at 01:50:22 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.