House 2010: GOP Retirement Woes Already Beginning?

Retirements can be the bane of party campaign efforts, as incumbents are significantly more likely to win reelection than candidates in open seat elections are to come out on top. Last cycle, depending on the way you count it the Republicans either set the record for House retirements or came close to it, almost undoubtedly increasing the number of seats the party lost come November 4. It is because of this that the news that already a second House Republican is talking about retiring weeks before the 111th Congress is even sworn in has to have GOP strategists concerned.

Less than a week after being reappointed as the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) will announce that he will not seek a tenth term in 2010, according to a source with knowledge of the decision.

Hoekstra, who has denied earlier reports that he will retire and consider a run for governor, will make the announcement on Monday, the source told The Hill.

Looking first locally, Pete Hoekstra's retirement means that a seat that otherwise wouldn't be in play is now potentially in play. On election day, according to The Hill, John McCain carried Michigan's second congressional district, which just elected Hoekstra to an eighth term, with just 50.8 percentage points. Throw on top of that the efforts by Congressional Republicans to shut down the Detroit automotive industry, and all the sudden MI-02 could genuinely be in play.

But more broadly, news that Hoekstra will be leaving the House, coming not long after the news that New York Republican Peter King may also be leaving the House, could be a real problem if it represents a beginning of a trend. As mentioned above, retirements make it significantly more difficult for a party to win seats nationwide. But beyond that, retirement announcements are not too dissimilar from the calls of the canary in a coal mine. If Republican incumbents are unwilling to face the voters in a reelection bid, it says a great deal -- to other potential candidates, who may then shy away from making runs of their own; to potential donors, who are less likely to contribute to futile efforts; and to the political press, who can serve to compound the process.

It's true that Hoekstra, as well as King, are not talking about straight retirements, but rather retirements for the purpose of making runs for other office. However, Mel Martinez's retirement from the Senate is one stemming from fear of facing reelection, and I have a hunch that it's not going to be the last one in either chamber. And if it's not, if this turns out to be the beginning of a trend of GOP retirements from both chambers of Congress, Republicans are going to have a tremendously difficult time clawing back into power.



Display:


expect this to be replicated (none / 0)

at the state level where we've gained majorities in the legislature.

Democrats have made gains in the Iowa House and Senate for four straight elections, capturing majorities in both in 2006. Although we didn't gain as many seats as I'd hoped in 2008, we did benefit from quite a few Republican retirements in the state House and Senate.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 12:43:33 PM EST

in Illinois (none / 0)

IL13--Biggert is likely to retire in either 2010 or 2012 b/c of age

IL10--Kirk has to make the jump in 2010 or 2012 to something else because the Dems can easily draw his district as a Dem district

IL06--Roskam will have three terms if he retires in 2012, allowing him retirement benefits. While not as simple to redraw as a Dem district as IL10, it's not hard to envision changes to make this district harder for the Republican to defend.

IL19--Shimkus was going to retire awhile back. I think redistricting may make this a true swing district if Decatur is included again and if some of the Dem areas along the Mississippi are added.

IL03--Lipinski is a Bush Dog Democrat and generally not an effective legislator. I'm hoping the rumor I heard is accurate. Since Downstate sacrificed the last district, IL03 will be sacrificed in 2012. This will cut the number of Dem seats by one, but Lip the Lesser is mostly useless to the Dems and it will create opportunities to make a number of districts more Dem.


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 01:00:23 PM EST

Re: House 2010: GOP Retirement Woes (none / 0)

Already two confirmed congressmen (Moran of Kansas and Hoekstra of Michigan) and two confirmed senators (Martinez of Florida and Brownback of Kansas).  Obama's not even sworn in yet.  We could see another landslide in 2010.


by Skaje on Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 05:04:47 PM EST

Re: House 2010: GOP Retirement Woes Already (none / 0)

On election day, according to The Hill, John McCain carried Michigan's second congressional district, which just elected Hoekstra to an eighth term, with just 50.8 percentage points.

Yeah, according to the Hill... via Swing State Project.


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 08:32:22 PM EST

None of the seats so far in the House (none / 0)

are likely going to be highly contested.  However, if we start to see folks like Bill Young, Mike Castle, Jim Gerlach, Mark Kirk and Frank LoBiondo go or run for higher office, we should be able to pick up those seats.  


by Kent on Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 12:04:35 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.