Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act

Go head on over to MeetTheBloggers.org. This week, I joined Cenk to discuss the Employee Free Choice Act with SEIU's Anna Burger.

It just began at 10am Pacific.

Update [2008-11-14 13:41:5 by Todd Beeton]:More context. The Employee Free Choice Act's importance can not be underestimated. It would revise the National Labor Relations Act to allow employees to join a union if a majority sign cards indicating their desire to do so. As it is now, an employer can challenge the card check and impose an additional secret ballot election; under the EFCA, an employer would be allowed to challenge card check only when illegal coercion is charged.

The Republican Party and their allies in business and the media have been organizing against EFCA, framing it as "the end of the secret ballot" and "Obama's gays in the military," ie, a liberal interest group-driven policy that will threaten Obama's first term agenda if he pursues it. Scary, right? The reality is that this legislation has widespread support throughout the country and even in Congress. In 2007, EFCA passed the House (it had 233 co-sponsors including 7 Republicans and passed 241-185) but ultimately got de-railed in the Senate where a cloture vote failed 51-48. But even there, every single Democrat (except Tim Johnson who was ill) plus both Independents plus Arlen Specter voted for cloture. With Johnson back in the Senate and six additional Democratic Senators, we currently would have 58 votes for cloture assuming everyone votes the same. That would rise to 60 if Alaska and Minnesota go our way.

So really, passing the Employee Free Choice Act is a simple matter of holding another vote once the next Congress convenes. SEIU is pursuing it as part of its first 100 days campaign to push President Obama and his new Democratic majorities not to shirk from the progressive mandate they received last Tuesday. Barack has promised on several occasions to sign it as president. The question remains whether he will push it off if Republicans succeed in framing it as divisive and partisan (God forbid!) Also, if it does come to a vote, will the more conservative Democrats vote for cloture or will they cave to business pressure? We all need to exert any pressure we can on our Senators and President-elect Obama to pursue this crucial legislation.

David Bonior's American Rights At Work has launched a new ad promoting the importance of the Employee Free Choice Act and asking people to call their members of congress to tell them to pass EFCA (more from Greg Sargent HERE.

Watch it:



Display:


Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Don't care much for unions, and certainly not getting rid of a secret ballot. Why is a secret ballot a bad idea? And while I think unions played an excellent role in the past (and still today in some cases), I can't shake the feeling they're mostly bloated and corrupt.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 01:46:29 PM EST

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Suddenly, it seems to be cool to be anti-union amongst progressives 'cos of this GM bailout thing...

Funny, liberals have wanted more government intervention for a long time, then when there's a chance to do it, everyone freaks out.

Let me remind you that unions are the engine of progressivism... these are the folks that put boots on the ground and convince blue collar voters to vote for their economic interest instead of guns and God!

Without strong unions, Democrats will have a hard time maintaining their majorities...  That is why the republicans are fighting the employee free choice act so hard...

It's going to be even more difficult now that the right wing meme is to blame unions for GM's demise... which his utter BS!  Hard working people should not take the blame for poor management!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 02:01:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Well, as a very recent former-Republican, I can't speak for the "anti-union progressives". I was an Assistant Store Manager with The Home Depot, I spent some time dealing with unionization things, and I don't care much for it. It has little to do with the auto inustries- though I do find it cute it costs more to fund the GE Healthcare fund in the percent of cost of a new car than the steel.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 02:25:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Oh, well then... Welcome! :-)

As for healthcare... it certainly helps Toyota that they don't have to pay for it...  If we had a sane health care system in this country, the big three probably wouldn't be in this situation!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 02:45:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

This is clearly a high stakes issue to several blogs and I'd like to understand why. Do union movements that pass in card-check often subsequently fail in secret ballot?


by JoeFelice on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 01:59:20 PM EST

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

The "secret ballot" thing is right wing FUD... Right now, it is very hard to organize 'cos management must be notified, and they do everything and anything to quash unionization.  Card check would make it much easier to organize and prevent a lot of union busting.

It has nothing to do with "secret ballots"... it's just a different mechanism to achieve union status... one that is more worker friendly.


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 02:03:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

I don't know how much of a Holy Grail this will be. Lots of countries in Europe have card check provisions like the EFCA, and their union numbers are dropping as well (granted, we in the U.S. have nowhere to go but up...).

The real deadweight holding workers down is Taft-Hartley. If this passes, the next advance labor should work on is getting rid of the prohibition on secondary (sympathy) strikes. Secondary strikes are a large part of what made the labor movement so successful in organizing so rapidly in the '30s and early '40s.


For Student Power: http://forstudentpower.org/blog
by Liberaltarian on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 05:31:34 PM EST

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Well, personally I think that banning permanent replacement workers is more useful than secondary strikes. Secondary strikes require a lot of cooperation and coordination between unions, and tends only to work in areas where you have that kind of union density in other sectors.


by Steven Attewell on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 07:05:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Meet The Bloggers: Employee Free Choice Act (none / 0)

Hi, I'm a progressive and a union member and organizer. Here's the deal with the "secret ballot" - the election is rigged before you even get to vote. Employers can spend unlimited amounts of company money on anti-union campaigns, require employees to attend vote-no meetings, require employees to attend one-on-one meetings, bar union organizers from the premises during elections, "predict" that the plant will close if the vote is yes, and so on. Unions can...stand out in the parking lot and try to hand out flyers.

How often does this happen? The University of Illinois at Chicago's Center for Urban Economic Development released a study in December 2005 that found: 30 percent of employers fire pro-union workers during union organizing drives; 49 percent of employers threaten to close a work site when workers try to unionize; 82 percent of employers hire union-busting consultants to fight organizing drives; and 91 percent of employers force employees to attend anti-union one-on-one meetings with supervisors.

So what's the solution? Having people sign up with cards, which already happens at a lot of workplaces, but only if the employer agrees to it (a lot of public sector organizing is done through card-check, for example). It's no less democratic than signing a petition or a ballot initiative or registering to vote.


by Steven Attewell on Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 07:03:10 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.