John McCain Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation

Yesterday, after his conviction on 7 felony counts, Ted Stevens declared his innocence and asked "Alaskans and his Senate colleagues to stand with him."

Umm, well...

At least two did: Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), a stalwart Stevens friend who testified on his behalf at trial.

John McCain for his part, self-professed maverick and fighter of all matters of corruption in Congress...well, he had to sleep on it.

GOP presidential candidate John McCain, already fighting a political environment hostile to Republicans, said Tuesday morning that Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) should resign from the Senate. [...]

"It is a sign of the health of our democracy that the people continue to hold their representatives to account for improper or illegal conduct, but this verdict is also a sign of the corruption and insider-dealing that has become so pervasive in our nation's capital," McCain said. "It is clear that Sen. Stevens has broken his trust with the people and that he should now step down. I hope that my colleagues in the Senate will be spurred by these events to redouble their efforts to end this kind of corruption once and for all."

Stevens has no intention of resigning, of course. His entire plan was to have an early trial result in his exoneration, which would then enable him to cruise to re-election in 7 days. Well, that sort of backfired. Now, conventional wisdom is that Stevens will lose his Senate seat to Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich and if he doesn't, will be expelled from the Senate shortly after election day (and Governor Palin would have to declare a new election to fill the spot -- one in which she herself would be able to run.) Let's not let it get to that point, shall we?

To his credit, Begich has never run overtly against Stevens' corruption and now that he's been convicted, is taking nothing for granted. From a Begich campaign e-mail blast:

As you have probably heard, Senator Stevens, my opponent in next week's election, has been convicted on seven felony counts of failing to disclose more than $250,000 in gifts from his friends. The last year has been a difficult one for Alaska, but Alaskans are strong and stand ready to move on to new, ethical representation in Washington.

While some may believe these convictions mean certain victory, this election is far from over. Senator Stevens remains a formidable opponent. [...]

Will you stand with me during these final 7 days of the election - helping me stay on TV, radio, and traveling around Alaska? We cannot give up, the stakes are too high.

This election is not about the verdict decided in a DC courtroom - that verdict will be delivered next week by Alaska's voters. Help me continue talking with them about the future of our country.

Give to Begich at the Road To 60 ActBlue page and help us reach 250 donors.



Display:


Palin in the senate? Why? (2.00 / 2)

A couple times now I have seen this idea that Palin could even run to fill Steven's seat.

Let's even assume that all the light on her has not damaged her rep with the Alaskan voters, my question is, why would she want to run for the senate anyway?

She clearly wants a role in national politics post the election but I can't see ONE upside to the senate for her, and plenty of downside.

1. She could lose!  That's not how you want to start your 2012 campaign.

2. She would be WAY down the role of seniority in the Senate, especially with an even bigger Demo majority.

3. She is running and will be as the ANTI DC candidate? What does being the junior senator from Alaska do for that mythos?

4. She seems like a big fish in a little pond type of person right now, she would be lost in the shuffle in the Senate. Better to remain the "maverick governor of Alaska" and be the go-to voice the Pundits, especially Faux go to.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 01:19:34 PM EST

Re: Palin in the senate? Why? (2.00 / 1)

Well, all of those arguments have merit, but they were unsuccessfully used against Barack Obama too.

Having said that, I think all of the pundits who are hyperventilating about how Palin is clearly the "frontrunner" for 2012 are, well, hyperventilating.  She is not going to last that long post-election.  Frankly, her best long-term hope may be as a Senator from AK, because the likelihood that the GOP would really pick her in 2012 seems slim.  The base loves her but the moderates are forcing a grin and tolerating her.


by auronrenouille on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 02:11:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Palin in the senate? Why? (none / 0)

Totally agree. The base loves Palin, but the middle dosen't at all. You don't win elections without the middle.


by phoenixdreamz on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 02:26:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation (none / 0)

The tendency of Republican senators to refuse to step down regardless of their wrong doing can only serve to help Democrats in down ballot races. Time for change.

Which reminds me, I wonder if there's video footage of the standing ovation Republican senators gave to Sen. David Vitter upon his return to the Senate floor? You may recall his diaper wearing romps with a hooker. If McCain was among those who stood for him that day, wouldn't it make a devastating closing week campaign ad <evil grin>


by phoenixdreamz on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 01:35:11 PM EST

David Vitters Standing O? (2.00 / 1)

I think the standing "O" was behind close doors, but I think it went something like this:

Vitter: "Yeah, I was paying for hookers but it wasn't GAY Hookers"

GOP Senate-Critters: "HOWZAA!!!!!!! YIPPPEEE!!! CONGRATS!!!!!!!! YOU'RE OUR GUY!!!!!!!"


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 01:41:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation (2.00 / 1)

I'm waiting for Palin to demand his resignation from public office. Ok..I'm still waiting.Guess I shouldn't hold my breath.


by Lodgemannered on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 01:55:46 PM EST

Re: John McCain Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation (2.00 / 1)

She's really gone rogue, I'm sure the McCain folks wanted a united front, but our Wassilla Diva has a mind of her own, and she is hedging her bets on Teddy, waiting to see how the winds are blowing back in Alaska.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 01:58:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Paliln, too, Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation (none / 0)

Reuters now reports that Palin and McCain (and Oregon's Gordon Smith, hoping to be seen with a 'White Hat') (and now Barack Obama, too) have called for Stevens' resignation.

Only problem is: the GOP cannot replace Stevens on the ballot, apparently, after September 17 (48 days before the election), according to Alaska statute.

(these links are also posted below:
The Alaska statute is here:
http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/akstats/Stat utes/Title15/Chapter25/Section110.htm

Kos's analysis is here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/29/ 12576/8665/499/558845


by MS on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 06:21:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John McCain Calls For Ted Stevens' Resignation (none / 0)

Word around DC is that Bush will pardon Stevens before Stevens February sentencing. In which case, does the Senate expel a pardoned felon?


by martinlomasney on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 03:41:53 PM EST

your first post EVER and you drop that one? (none / 0)

Yeah, right.

Where EXACTLY did you hear that word around DC?

Why THE HELL would Bush do that?

Neither he NOR the Republican party give a whit about Stevens guilty ass...


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 04:07:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Stevens will be pardoned (none / 0)

I heard it on the local DC NPR station's talk show.

The guy's 82(?). Under sentencing guidelines, he's not going to do a long stretch anyway.  Why do you think the sentencing isn't happening until February?

If Bush is going to pardon Libby, as everyone expects, he pardons Stevens and everyone potentially exposed to indictment for torture and other war crimes before he makes his exit on 1/20/'09.  He's not going to leave these folks to the tender mercies of an Obama or McCain Justice Department.


by martinlomasney on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 04:19:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Stevens Cannot be Replaced on Alaska Sen Ballot (none / 0)

Stevens cannot, apparently, be replaced on the Alaska Senatorial ballot by the GOP.

According to Kos, Alaska statute prevents the GOP from replacing their candidate (Stevens) after 48 days before the election (September 17).

That seems to mean the GOP is stuck with Stevens on the ballot, and their only hope is that Stevens beats Begich (we hope not!) and then could be replaced in a special election, if he's forced to resign from the Senate. (Once again, McCain has asked for something that is legally impossible -- asking for Stevens to resign now so he could be replaced on the ballot -- just as he announced during the initial fiscal crisis discussions that he would fire the financial agency (forgot which one - SEC?) head, who can be appointed by the president but not fired by him.)

The Alaska statute is here:
http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/akstats/Stat utes/Title15/Chapter25/Section110.htm

Kos's analysis is here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/29/ 12576/8665/499/558845


by MS on Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 06:10:44 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.