DSCC Pulling Out of Colorado (It's a Good Sign)

Chris Cillizza has the news, which he seems to slip into a more or less unrelated article (in parens, no less):

(It's worth noting that a national party committee pulling advertising out of a state isn't always a bad sign. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has pulled its advertising in the Colorado Senate race, but that is a sign of their confidence of winning, not their acceptance of defeat.)

This isn't the largest piece of news ever, especially considering that folks like Charlie Cook already predict that the Democrats will pick up between seven and nine seats in two weeks (this Colorado seat likely being number three out of them). Nevertheless, this is a seat that the Republicans had hoped to hold on to in a state that although trending Democratic still has fairly deep Republican roots. This very seat, in fact, nearly went Democratic in each of the last two times it came before the voters of the state of Colorado, only to be won by the Democrats. And yet the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee feels confident enough about Colorado that they are pulling out and moving on to new states like Georgia -- expanding the map and increasing the party's chances of reaching 60. If you want to help out in the effort, head over to the MyDD Road to 60 Act Blue page and make a contribution today.



Display:


Sweet... (none / 0)

Obama coattails baby!!!  That's what putting 80,000 in MILE HIGH STADIUM will do for you.  


by nzubechukwu on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 09:48:35 PM EST

Re: Sweet... (none / 0)

Dems will need to run up the score in the House to protect the majority against a likely GOP wave in 2010 if Obama is in the WH. Likely losses could be between 30 and 40 seats. By the same token Dems will need to run up the score in the Senate to protect the majority against a 2010 GOP wave. 275 seats in 2008 means 235 seats in 2010 with an Obama Presidency. 60 seats in the Senate in 2008 means 54-55 seats in the Senate in 2010..in both cases Dems preserve the majority.


by Boilermaker on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 11:57:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sweeter (none / 0)

If you are thinking 94, think again. The Republicans don't have a Newt Gingrich and Rush/O'Reilley/Fox have no freshness. True the Dems have to protect more especially in the House, but the Reptiles actually have to recruit good candidates, which hasn't been their strength lately. After that they have to get money (not so much of a problem) but then they have to actually have a message.

So my take is the 2010 could be a modest opportunity for them, but one that will slip by. Seriously, after the shellacking of 2008, who are their are their rising stars? Jindal?

Looking at the actual Senate races, I'd say the Republicans have a lot more to defend in the Senate.

For the Dems:
North Dakota - Dem Dorgan may retire.
Barbara Boxer of California vs Schwarzenegger?

For the Reptiles:
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
David Vitter of Louisiana
Mel Martinez of Florida
Jim Bunning of Kentucky
Kit Bond of Missouri
Richard Burr of North Carolina
Tom Coburn of Oklahoma
John Thune of South Dakota


by CSears on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 12:32:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sweeter (none / 0)

and Arizona if McCain retires.


by CSears on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 12:43:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.