The Al Qaeda Endorsement

It was common in 2004 for Republicans to imply...or even state outright, that John Kerry was Al Qaeda's preferred candidate. For example, when asked if he felt that Al Qaeda would "operate with more comfort" if John Kerry were elected, Dennis Hastert said Yes.

Even oh so honorable John McCain has made reference this year to the idea that if you listen to its leaders, Al Qaeda clearly wants Barack Obama to win.

Umm, really?

In an endorsement that will not be welcomed by Mr McCain's flagging campaign, the group said that if al-Qaeda wants to exhaust the USmilitarily and economically, the "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate is the better choice.

"This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said.

"Then, al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."

"If al-Qaeda carries out a big operation against American interests," it said, "this act will be support of McCain because it will push the Americans deliberately to vote for McCain so that he takes revenge for them against al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda then will succeed in exhausting America till its last year in it."

Not exactly Colin Powell, but, hey, it's something.

Update [2008-10-22 12:45:54 by Todd Beeton]:The McCain campaign held a conference call to pushback against the idea that Al Qaeda would prefer a McCain presidency. Spencer Ackerman was on it and describes their reaction as "panicked" but hardly thoughtful.

What was absent from the call, oddly enough, was any discussion about why Al Qaeda might want McCain to win. And there the case is simple enough. Al Qaeda prefers an indefinite U.S. occupation of Iraq and a bellicose U.S. all across the Muslim world to radicalize Muslims to its terrorist cause and drain the U.S. of its financial wealth — what Osama bin Laden calls his “bleed to bankruptcy” strategy. Hence, the reason why, as the CIA eventually concluded, Bin Laden tried to help George W. Bush’s reelection in 2004 by releasing a late-October tape. McCain pledges basic continuity with Bush on the Iraq war. As Scheunemann put it, “John McCain will spend what it takes to win.”

Yet the idea of Al Qaeda preferring a U.S. strategy that strengthens it confounded the McCain camp. “It is ridiculous to believe that in its heart of hearts, Al Qaeda wants John McCain to be the president,” Woolsey said. “It’s ludicrous.” But the only thing that’s ludicrous is Woolsey’s expectation that the American public will keep falling for this sort of misdirection by the same blinkered analysts who blundered the U.S. into Iraq in the first place.



Display:


Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

I hear the McCain campaign is hold a conference call on this or has. Can't wait to hear the spin on this one.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:28:24 PM EST

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

I'm sure they will try to say that this is just Al Qaeda using reverse psychology on Americans. They really want an Obama win no matter what they tell you.


by assemblyline on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:34:00 PM EST

Wow! Talk about getting it Right (none / 0)

From HuffPo:

The most interesting line, however, came from former CIA Director Jim Woosley, who sought to frame the al-Qaeda blog posting as some sort of attempt at reverse political psychology

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/22 /mccain-surrogate-al-qaeda_n_136869.html


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:48:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

Yeah, we tried that angle, too, in 2004.  No one bought it back then, either.  If this was some sort of official press release, maybe... but, this is random discussion on a blog...  McCain is going to have to explain this and when you are explaining you are losing.


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 01:03:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, I completely agree (none / 0)

I agree that McCain's biggest hope is for Al Qaeda to carry out a successful attack on US soil sometime before the election.


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:36:42 PM EST

It's a double blind switcheroo!!!! (none / 0)

Yah see, Bin Laden KNOWS that McCain is going to chase him to the "gates of hell" so he's terrified of him...

So, by endoring him, he knows it will SEEM he wants Obama, but those really smart voters like Joe the Plumber will figure out the double-switcheroo...especially when Rush explains it to him.

Either that, or he just digs Palin's red leather outfit and her "Whoop-Whoop" moments on SNL!


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:37:21 PM EST

Jon Soltz of VoteVets has a great analysis (none / 0)

http://vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId =2070

McCain told us in April that Hamas had endorsed Obama, as if Obama had sought out that kind of endorsement.

But there's something else at play, here.  The war in Iraq, as well as saber rattling against Iran by McCain and those who surround him, like Joe Lieberman, are an excellent recruiting tool for al Qaeda.  That's not a new notion.


We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America. -Barack Obama
by NavyBlueWife on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:40:10 PM EST

This is one everyone (none / 0)

This is a subject everyone should stay away from. I don't think it's in either side's interest to even comment on what Al Qaeda may or may want for this election. No one should consider in any way what they want. The Repubs tried to score cheap political points on us in 2004 ... we shouldn't try to score cheap political points on them.

We have too many good issues to stand on without Al Qaeda's input.


by Cleveland John on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:41:39 PM EST

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

Not helpful to Obama. No mention of al Qaeda is better than anything they might say.  The only people who could possibly be influenced by al Qaeda in this election won't be interested/capable of understnading the nuance of this argument.


by Democrat in Chicago on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:47:28 PM EST

For the last two posters.... (none / 0)

The Obama campaign is too smart to go anywhere with this...

Let the Republican's and McCain have to thrash around with this....It's their ball.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 12:51:47 PM EST

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

At least McCain gets an endorsement... he's got us where he wants us!


by french imp on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 01:47:40 PM EST

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

"It is ridiculous to believe that in its heart of hearts, Al Qaeda wants John McCain to be the president," Woolsey said. "It's ludicrous."

if one were looking to further debilitate and incite  a population against a superpower through endless asymmetrical warfare, having the superpower led by a bellicose, irrational, shoot first and ask questions later trigger-happy unthinking crank would seem to be just the ticket. Al Qaida his always been far more rational and logical in achieving its objectives than our republican neocon goons have been. This is a totally believable story.


by gak on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 02:09:47 PM EST

Re: The Al Qaeda Endorsement (none / 0)

What I don't get is why they didn't go for the obvious: You're taking the word of terrorists? They are liars! "AQ knows their endorsement would be seen as a bad thing, they are trying to sink our campaign because Senator Obama's campaign is the one with appeasers!"

Woolsey seemed to allude to this in the Ackerman report but I would assume it would be the main point.


by MNPundit on Wed Oct 22, 2008 at 02:14:20 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.