McCain's Path

OK, so McCain is pulling out of Michigan. So what now? The Politico has the McCain campaign's strategy.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) now must win Pennsylvania, Wisconsin or Minnesota in order to get enough electoral votes to win the presidency, his campaign says. [...]

"Our ability to pick off one of those three states is where our fortunes are largely held," a McCain official said. "These are states where Barack Obama is on the defense."

McCain political director Mike Duhaime also said on the conference call that they're going after Maine's 2nd congressional district's 1 EV.

Umm, really? First of all it doesn't even strike me as true, but also, how realistic do they really think picking off one of these states really is. What they really need to do is get off offense and go into full defense mode so they can hold Bush states minus NM & IA for a 274-264 EV win.

But this strategy they've laid out seems like more than just posturing or self-deprecation or even bluster. They're actually staffing up in Maine, so this admission that McCain's only path depends on winning a blue (albeit purplish) state + a purplish district must mean that they've already given up on winning at least one if not two Bush states. But which ones? Here are more clues:

McCain figures that winning one of those three big remaining swing states, plus those he considers safe, would put him 10 shy of the 270 electoral votes he needs to win.

"We can dig up an additional 10 electoral votes in Nevada, Colorado and New Hampshire," the official said. [...]

"We feel strongly that we're going to win in Florida, Missouri and the traditional Republican states of Virginia and North Carolina."

OK, so let's reverse engineer it. If we give McCain all the states that he feels he needs to win (which is essentially most Bush states + NH + 1 EV in Maine), we can then figure out which Bush state/s they expect Obama to win by taking some away and finding a scenario by which McCain's victory is by the slimmest of slim margins (which is the only reason 1 EV in Maine would be worth going after.)

1. McCain wins Minnesota (10 EVs):

Bush states - NM - IA + NH + MN + ME-02 = McCain 289/Obama 249

So what states, other than the ones Duhaime insisted they'd need to win, would Obama have to win for this to be even close? Ohio.

Bush states - NM - IA + NH + MN + ME-02 - OH = McCain 269/Obama 269

Yikes. All that Maine cd does is get them a tie.

2. McCain wins Wisconsin (10 EVs):

Same as above.

3. McCain wins Pennsylvania (21 EVs):

Bush states - NM - IA + NH + PA + ME-02 = McCain 300/Obama 238

What would Obama have to lose for McCain to win? Ohio AND Colorado.

Bush states - NM - IA - OH - CO + NH + PA + ME-02 = McCain 271/Obama 267

The point here is that if the McCain campaign really believes it has to win one of either Wisconsin, Minnesota or Pennsylvania, that means they're already conceding at least one Bush state, which currently looks most likely to be Ohio. That seems odd, since Florida at the moment looks far more likely to flip to Obama than Ohio does. Of course, they could know something we don't know, such the likely impact of early voting in Ohio, which just began on Tuesday, at what arguably is the height of Obama's popularity.

In the end, the McCain team would be wise to read Chris Bowers' advice, which is on the money:

Carpetbomb Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio and Virginia with paid media, mailings, field, staff, rallies, retail politics, the works. Seriously--don't target any other states except those six, based on the reasonable assumption that if McCain wins all six of those states, he will also pick up Indiana, Missouri, North Carolina and West Virginia. Supplement this narrow targeting strategy, and counter the 50 state investment by the DNC and the Obama campaign, with a high intensity national cable campaign designed to maintain national poll numbers and possibly shake another state or two loose. If the strategy works, then McCain wins the electoral college 278-260, and possibly edges Obama out in the popular vote.

See? Easy.

Update [2008-10-2 20:38:13 by Todd Beeton]:Chris Cilizza reports the McCain strategy conference call slightly differently:

Their map: Win six toss up states -- Florida, Missouri, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana and Ohio -- that have traditionally favored Republicans and hold the solidly GOP states to get to 260 electoral votes. Then find 10 more electoral votes in some combination of Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

"To say we are on defense is not true," insisted Strimple. "We are aggressively using our resources in states where we have to win."

Maybe. But the problem with that logic is it assumes McCain can hold those six red state tossups, which, in the case of Ohio, Colorado and Virginia (at least) looks to be a dicey proposition.

"We're on offense! We're on offense!"



Display:


Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

are my numbers right here, folks?


by Todd Beeton on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:16:31 PM EST

Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

This is whyMi is a big deal. I saw some Republican online say that pulling out of Michigan was like pulling out of Massachsetts. BULLSHIT.

If you go back to the 1988 election, only in the blowout year of 1996 was Michigan not heavily contested. Bill Clinton, Mike Dukakis, Al Gore, John Kerry and both Bushes spent at least one of the final few days there. The Democrats' winning streak notwithstand, MI is MOT a blue state. And they can't ein there, they won't win Wiscosin and probably will not win Pennsylvania.


by RandyMI on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:35:27 PM EST

Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

You are right. If the moose hunter couldn't swing the Reagan Democrats in Michigan how is she going to swing them in PA, WI, MN?

This election is over barring an Obama meltdown.


by sweet potato pie on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:39:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ambinder says that Obama's internals (none / 0)

show a closer race than the polls indicate in PA.  Perhaps they are just bsing Ambinder, who has been deliberately misled before with the best example of the Clinton camp telling him they would be happy losing by less than ten in South Dakota.

McCain's camp says that PA is close according to internals but what else do you expect it to say.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:44:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ambinder says that Obama's internals (none / 0)

I think PA is close but that in the end it will be very very hard for McCain to win it due to Philly. Obama could lose all but 8 counties in PA and still win.


by sweet potato pie on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:47:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ambinder says that Obama's internals (none / 0)

Quick rule of thumb. Michigan is generally to the left of Ohio. Pennsylvania is generayll to the left of Michigan. Wisconsin is generally to theleft of Pennsylvania.


by RandyMI on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:53:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Disagree (none / 0)

Wisconsin has been closer than both PA and MI the last two elections.

Agreed about Ohio being to the right of all those states.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:57:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The article may be wrong (none / 0)

Are we assuming McCain is going to lose Colorado?  If I'm not mistaken, McCain doesn't have to win any Kerry/Gore states and can win the election 274-264 that way.

Obama is an 80% favorite at this point pre-debate.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:37:52 PM EST

Re: The article may be wrong (none / 0)

The problem is that you are assuming that McCain is going to somehow hold onto Iowa and New Mexico, which will not happen.


by RandyMI on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:43:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Huh? (none / 0)

Kerry/Gore states get Obama to 264; Gore won Iowa and New Mexico.  McCain doesn't need them.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:45:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

The bailout must be killing McCain in the rust belt.  His campaign is writing off Michigan, and as you noted, they seem to believe Ohio is the most likely of this year's Big Three to be lost.

If that is the case, then Pennsylvania will be difficult for him to pick up.  He's depending on the Pennsyltucky demographic to vote for race rather than their pocketbooks.

The way things stand, it's going to be very difficult for McCain.  Out of Minnesota and Wisconsin, he should focus the most on whichever one has the more restrictive early voting.  The current setup is poison for McCain, and he's gotta get at least some nationwide movement back his way in the next few weeks to have a real shot.


by therealdeal on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 08:43:49 PM EST

Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

What happens on election night if McCain and Obama tie at 269/269?


by cameoanne on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 01:00:03 AM EST

Re: McCain's Path (none / 0)

SUSA just put a poll out showing McCain +1 in MN. Probably an outlier, but still much closer than any recent poll in MI.

So maybe McCain's new strategy isn't totally dumb after all. He certainly can't afford to target all the mid-west states given how many red states are vulnerable this year, so presumably his internal polling has told him that MI is further out of reach than the other 3.

I suspect he will probably also be pulling back in WI and NM before too long, but may keep going in the remainder. I think he does need to keep up the fight in at least one larger blue state to maintain morale as much as anything.


by al1 on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 05:55:33 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.