AIPAC gets its comeuppance.

This article on an off beat news blog asks us to consider whether US foreign policy finally belongs to the US or does it still belong to Israel, that is, the Israel Lobby, and are our congresspersons still sucking up to a foreign government that is pulling our tail.

Jim Lobe wrote this yesterday: Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for 'Israel Lobby'

Link HERE: http://ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idne ws=1716

Has the American news media carried the story? Don't know, but it is doubtful.

WASHINGTON, 26 Sep (IPS) - In a significant and highly unusual defeat for the so-called 'Israel Lobby', the Democratic leadership of the House of Representatives has decided to shelve a long-pending, albeit non-binding, resolution that called for President George W. Bush to launch what critics called a blockade against Iran.

House Congressional Resolution (HR) 362, whose passage the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) had made its top legislative priority this year, had been poised to pass virtually by acclamation last summer.

But an unexpectedly strong lobbying effort by a number of grassroots Iranian-American, Jewish-American, peace, and church groups effectively derailed the initiative, although AIPAC and its supporters said they would try to revive it next year or if Congress returns to Washington for a 'lame-duck' session after the November elections.

Congress, which may still adopt a package of new unilateral economic sanctions against Iran -- some of which the administration has already imposed -- over the weekend, is expected to adjourn over the next several days.

''We'll resubmit it when Congress comes back, and we'll have even more signatures,'' the resolution's main author, New York Democrat Rep. Gary Ackerman, told the Washington Times, adding that the resolution currently has 270 co-sponsors, or some two-thirds of the House's entire membership.

Still, the decision by the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Howard Berman, to shelve HR 362 marked an unusual defeat for AIPAC, according to its critics who charged that the resolution was designed to lay the groundwork for the Bush administration or any successor administration to take military action against Iran.

Read the rest at the LINK above.

One clause in the resolution also stated that 'nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran,' even though a blockade against Iran could be construed as an act of war under international law.

The two key Democratic congressmen, who had initially co-sponsored the resolution, Reps. Robert Wexler and Barney Frank, defected in July after they insisted that the language of the resolution be changed to exclude any possibility that it could be used to justify war against Iran.

The resolution was introduced last May, shortly after AIPAC's annual meeting. At that time,-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reportedly told the House Democratic leadership that economic sanctions against Iran had run their course and that stronger action, including a possible naval quarantine, was needed. The meeting followed talks between Olmert and Bush who informed that Washington would almost certainly not attack Iran's nuclear facilities nor give a green light Israel to launch an attack of its own before he leaves office.

With typical arrogance, AIPAC went over Bush's head and pushed for adoption of the resolution, even though it was not designed to justify any military action, which AIPAC was clearly pushing for.

But just who runs this country and its foreign policy? I suspect that we have not heard the last to this! AIPAC and the Neocons got us into Iraq, and it will not give up until it gets us into Iran. The former conflict will cost the US taxpayers a trillion dollars before it ends. Can we afford another Iraq?

Jim Lobe's blog on U.S. foreign policy, and particularly the neo-conservative influence in the Bush administration, can be read at http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/.



Display:


Re: AIPAC gets its comeuppance. (2.00 / 1)

Thank goodness. It's time we stopped forming our foreign policy around Israel. Our unquestioning alliance with Israel does nothing to make our country safer.


by venician on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 02:11:57 PM EST

Re: AIPAC gets its comeuppance. (none / 0)

Sad as it seems, Biden last night seemed to be repeating a right wing AIPAC position regarding peace in the Middle East. No peace.


by MainStreet on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 10:15:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

AIPAC is not Israel (2.00 / 2)

..any more than the Bush neocons are the USA.

Oddly enough, Israel is chock full of people who don't love the idea of war with Iran. ;)


by rhetoricus on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 03:08:06 PM EST

Re: AIPAC is not Israel (2.00 / 1)

There seems to be people in the USA and Israel who are not acting in the best interest of their peoples. Somehow the voices of the majority will eventually be heard.


by MainStreet on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 10:18:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

2 more news items (2.00 / 1)

1. posted on docudharma the other day:

Iran on Israel's Radar, Manned by USA

2. mentioned on C-Span Washington Journal this morning (Oct 4, 2008):  State Dept plans to set up an interest section in Tehran have been shelved.

looks like Condi lost, again, to the Cheneyists and the AIPAC crowd.  Sarah must be so proud of her guy Dick.


by Jeffersons Bible on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 02:01:10 PM EST

Don't misunderestimate AIPAC (2.00 / 1)

quite the opposite from thesis of the diary, I think AIPAC is on a roll.  The bailout tactics had AIPAC written all over the place.

and here's an update to the news item above:

Israelis wary of a US Radar Base in the Negev:

When a contingent of U.S. soldiers opens a radar facility on a mountaintop in the Negev desert next month, Israel will for the first time in its 60-year history have a permanent foreign military base on its soil. And despite the early warning that the American radar would provide if Iran launches a missile attack on Israel, some senior Israeli officials are nonetheless wary about its presence. Complained one top official, "It's a like a pair of golden handcuffs on Israel."

Has anyone found the article that says, "Israel declines US military billions?  Give up the gold and you can give up the handcuffs.  But right now, Israel has the US in BORROWED handcuffs:  if US does not placate Israel, Israel will pull some s*&t in Iran which will result in Iran reacting adversely against American soldiers in Iraq.


by Jeffersons Bible on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 02:21:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.