The Empathy Gap

Back in August John McCain was making inroads among precisely the groups that many Democrats feared could be Obama's downfall: working class whites and rural voters. EJ Dionne wrote at the time that Rep. Joe Sestak, who represents a suburban Philadelphia district, had some advice for Obama to overcome this:

Over in the Philadelphia suburbs, Rep. Joe Sestak agrees that Obama needs to engage in more down-to-earth campaigning -- "a diner in the morning, a hoagie in the afternoon, a bar at night." But Sestak's advice is directed toward a slightly different end. "It's not so much about whether they know him," he says of his constituents and Obama. "They want to know that he knows them."

Dionne elaborated:

In other words, empathy, the gift that Bill Clinton kept on giving, is now an Obama imperative. And some of the Democrats' policy mavens see a link between empathy as a personal attribute and the way a candidate discusses policy -- again, something Clinton understood.

While certainly Obama has been striving to improve on this measure -- and shed the elitist label that has dogged Democrats since Bill Clinton -- since at least August, the financial crisis has given him the opportunity to really open up an empathy gap over McCain by demonstrating not only that McCain is out of touch but that Obama is in touch with the struggles of every day Americans.

As I cataloged HERE, Obama's debate performance was all about sending this very message, as he repeatedly looked into the camera and spoke to people at home, referring to them several times as "you" and used the words "struggling" and "middle class."

And by all accounts it's working. Poll after poll shows Obama opening up significant leads, driven mostly by the economic situation and the perception that not only is he best equipped to handle it, but that he better understands their struggles.

From the new CBS poll, which shows Obama up 50-41:

In addition to the economy, Obama has a clear advantage on empathy, with 67 percent saying Obama understands their needs and problems compared to 46 percent for McCain.

And from the new AP/GfK poll, which gives Obama a 7 point lead among likely voters, Obama has opened up a 14 point lead on the question of which candidate people "trust to understand how the financial crisis effects you." Interestingly, this is better than the 9 point lead he has on who they trust to "improve the economy" and "handle a financial crisis."

But to be honest, I don't think I've seen Obama speak more eloquently or passionately about the struggles of the middle class than he did on the stump in Michigan today.

Watch it:

Call it finding his voice, call it hitting his stride, in Michigan, I think it's called winning.

John McCain is pulling out of Michigan, according to two Republicans, a stunning move a month away from Election Day that indicates the difficulty Republicans are having in finding blue states to put in play.



Display:


He told us he was a good closer... (none / 0)

There is the story of his fundraisers worried how bad Hillary was kicking his butt in the debates, and he told them "my strength is learning and adapting. I close well, I get better in the later rounds.

We are at the start of round 12 of a 15 round fight, with a good counter puncher and a point lead.

The other fighters corner is telling him, his only shot is a late round knock-out.

Expect the worst of the dirt to start flying next week.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 04:19:37 PM EST

off topic (none / 0)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1xQeOPE9ePU/SO L4WQcmQxI/AAAAAAAACms/VOQXNmoccf0/s1600- h/palinfacebookpage.jpg


vote blue in 2008
by sepulvedaj3 on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 04:28:38 PM EST

Re: The Empathy Gap (none / 0)

Well, as long as Obama wins, that's the man thing, of course.  Because it's all about Obama.   I'm sure that the poor slobs who are barely hanging on to their houses and jobs; worrying about their retirement and sending the kids to college and will get nothing out of this bailout except the bill, feel so much better now that Obama's found his voice.  If You Can Fake Sincerity, You've Got It Made!

By the way, for what Obama's saying in private, consider this from Ian Welsh: I can't think of any way to sugar coat this, I'm afraid. It's a bad bill and it isn't just that Barack Obama voted for it, it's that everything I'm hearing from the Hill says that he's been actively whipping it, not just in the Senate but in the House. Barack didn't hold his nose and vote for this, he made it his bill as much as it is Paulson's.

With this bill go your chances of having, say, universal health care, or massive infrastructure development, or really getting the US of its dependence on foreign oil, or really rebuilding America's school system--or whatever other big, expensive project you thought Obama was promising. 700 billion is a lot of money, and in the end this is almost certainly going to cost even more than that. Probably at least 1.5 trillion. (The technical term, I believe, is 'good money after bad').

As Michael Moore points out, the richest 400 people in America, who own as much as 150 million Americans, coincidentally saw their net worth increase by, oh, 700 billion during Bush's reign. They got that money largely based on government largesse and private fraud aided by deregulatory administration officials. And they don't intend to give it back to pay for the mess that they and the people who, in effect, work for them, have created.

Instead, as usual, it's the middle class that gets to pay. And it's Barack Obama who turned to Nancy Pelosi and Reid and said "this bill must pass". It's Obama who is whipping votes and bending arms for this despite the fact that it is massively unpopular. This is Obama's bill.

I assume he's willing to give up the 700 billion for the near dictatorial power over the US economy which is still embedded in the bill, power which he will wield through his Treasury Secretary. Or maybe, encouraged by his economic advisers, almost all of whom were amongst the architects and cheerleaders of the policies which made this crisis occur, he really believes that bailing out the rich with middle class money is how the country has to operate. After all, some people are important and some people aren't, and since the middle class can vote for him or for a man who has made himself into a national joke with Sarah Palin as the punchline, what are they going to do? Vote for John McCain, the laughingstock, who was also for the bill he was against, or some such?

If this bill doesn't work, or even if it does, it will have a huge cost and that cost will be born by the middle class. Even if you think it will work, not adding surcharges to make the rich pay for their own bailout is unconscionable.

Americans are being robbed, reverse Robin Hood style. Take money from ordinary folks, hand it directly to the rich. That's Obama's first real act as the presumptive President and as the Democratic party's de-facto leader." http://firedoglake.com/2008/10/01/obama- betrays-the-middle-class-votes-for-bail- out-the-rich-act/

Yeah, baby! Change you can believe in! (But only if you shut your eyes and clap really, really hard).


Mitch Guthman
by Mitch Guthman on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 05:01:40 PM EST

Re: The Empathy Gap (none / 0)

That bad in PUMA land, eh Mitch?

Pathetic.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 05:06:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Empathy Gap (none / 0)

Silly me!  I thought it was about the issues and about helping to change our country for the better.  Promoting liberal values.  Maybe helping to keep people in their homes in time of economic crisis. Not making a no-strings-attached gift to Wall Street bankers of  $700 billion of taxpayer money.  Maybe promoting and protecting our civil liberties.  Defending the Constitution.  That sort of stuff.

Personally, I'm invested in my traditional Democratic values.  I evaluate politicians on the strength of their commitment to those values and polices.   I evaluate them on their willingness to fight for what they believe in and to put those beliefs above personal ambition.

Speaking for myself, I have absolutely nothing good to say about him. Based on the positions he's taken and what he's done during this campaign, I have concluded that Obama stands for nothing, believes in nothing and risks nothing for others.

Why do you Obama supporters continue to believe in him?  Why is important to you that his is winning? What is the change that you expect he will bring?  


Mitch Guthman
by Mitch Guthman on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 06:40:27 PM EST

You needed to stop at (2.00 / 1)

Silly Me!

We believed you, the rest just proved that was all you needed to say.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 06:54:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Empathy Gap (none / 0)

And now the McTrolls move into panic mode. The people arn't buying what they're selling.


by venician on Thu Oct 02, 2008 at 10:59:47 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.