NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks on Obama's Prochoice Record

FROM NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA

January 24, 2008

A Message to Pro-Choice Voters Regarding the Democratic Presidential
Primary

Nancy Keenan is president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.

This week Americans mark the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a milestone that coincides with the 2008 presidential election. As we celebrate this occasion, and this critical time for women's reproductive freedom, NARAL Pro-Choice America is proud that we have such strong pro-choice candidates like

Sens. Hillary Clinton
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/election s/statements/clinton.html  

and
Barack Obama
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/election s/statements/obama.html

and former Sen. John Edwards
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/election s/statements/edwards.html

running for president.

http://www.bushvchoice.com/archives/2008 01/a_message_to_pr.html

As the political leader of the pro-choice movement, NARAL Pro-Choice
America has researched the voting records, public comments, and actions of each of the candidates and shared the information  we've documented with the more than one-million activists, supporters, and members our organization represents.
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/election s

Beginning in Iowa, continuing into New Hampshire, and now in South Carolina and the states voting in the February 5 contests, there has been an undercurrent of speculation and innuendo that calls into question Sen. Obama's record on choice.

This has the potential to divide the pro-choice community and create tension where none should exist. Today, for the sake of our issue and our movement, I am asking that these tactics stop.

As someone who spent nearly two decades as an elected official before coming to
NARAL Pro-Choice America, I know that, in the heat of the campaign,
charges and counter-charges are made in the honest belief that one
candidate is somehow better than another. I get that.
<http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/about-us/meet-nancy>

Let me be clear: Here are the facts pro-choice voters need as they head
to the polls, whether this weekend in South Carolina, on "Tsunami
Tuesday" to vote for the Democratic Party's nominee, or on November 4
when we all vote for the next president of the United States:  Sens.

Clinton, Edwards, and Obama are fully pro-choice.  NARAL Pro-Choice
America endorsed all three candidates in their previous campaigns.  All
of the candidates have voted pro-choice; have publicly affirmed that
they are pro-choice; and have taken actions that back up their
pro-choice voting records and statements. All three candidates endorse
the Freedom of Choice Act
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/issues/a bortion/access-to-abortion/freedom-of-ch oice-act.html

which would codify Roe and protect the right to choose for future generations. Sens.
Clinton, Edwards, and Obama have steadfastly supported and defended a woman's right to make the most personal, private decisions regarding her reproductive health without interference from government or politicians.  

NARAL Pro-Choice America has not yet endorsed a candidate for president
because there are such equally strong pro-choice contenders in the
Democratic primary. We understand that other organizations have made
different decisions; we respect that. But our collective long-term goal
as a pro-choice movement must be to advance the cause.

This focus on nonexistent differences between the pro-choice candidates
distracts from the real goal. We must focus our fight on defeating the
anti-choice Republican candidates who have called for the overturn of
Roe.

NARAL Pro-Choice America will continue to support pro-choice candidates
and defend them all against attacks.  We can only hope that in the
future, we, as a unified pro-choice community, will be defending against
anti-choice politicians, not one another.



Display:


the difference between Clinton and Obama (2.00 / 0)

on woman's rights and Choice is clear.  Clinton has stood up and Obama has voted "present".  Yah yah... it was strategery.
NARAL has also endorsed Lieberman, and the two pretend moderate senators from Maine.

ABO... Anybody but Obama. I LIKE the democratic party.

by MollieBradford on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:01:30 PM EST

Re: the difference between Clinton and Obama (none / 0)

The present votes were made at the request of  the PROCHOICE community in IL. They asked all Democratic Sentators to vote present on these bills.  19 Senators, inlcuding Senator Obama did what was requested by ProChoice leaders in the state.  It was part of their political strategy.

Both Planned Parenthood and NARAL supported these votes and have given Obama a 100% pro choice rating.

There is no there there.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:02:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"Pro-choice" community sez different (none / 0)

"During Senator Obama's 2004 senate campaign, the Illinois NOW PAC did not recommend the endorsement of Obama for U.S. Senate because he refused to stand up for a woman's right to choose and repeatedly voted `present' on important legislation.

As a State Senator, Barack Obama voted `present' on seven abortion bills, including a ban on 'partial birth abortion,' two parental notification laws and three 'born alive' bills.  In each case, the right vote was clear, but Senator Obama chose political cover over standing and fighting for his convictions.

"When we needed someone to take a stand, Senator Obama took a pass," said Bonnie Grabenhofer, president of Illinois NOW. "He wasn't there for us then and we don't expect him to be now."

http://www.illinoisnow.org/


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 04:54:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

NARAL on more Clinton lies and smears (none / 0)

NARAL trying to set the record straight on more Clinton lies and smears.

You'd think Hillary would have some respect for NARAL and more importantly the fight for a woman's right to choose. But no, they will do anything. They will lie cheat and steal to try and get back to the White House. They will go after people that support a woman's right to choose.


Slash and burn politics baby! Say anything do anything lie cheat steal railroad the opposition into submission: CLINTON FORMULA FOR 2008.
by crackityjones on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:12:17 PM EST

Obama was A.W.O.L. (none / 0)

Presenting facts about the candidates are NOT smears. During critical votes, Obama DID NOT support abortion rights. He instead merely voted "PRESENT." That was his CHOICE, and many women got the message, loud and clear.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 05:07:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Naral has about as much credibility (none / 0)

Sure, NARAL has no credibility on protecting reproductive choice? Where the hell does that kind of bullshit comment come from?

what is it about the Clinton folks here that they have to attack anyone who doesn't agree with them entirely ... reminds me of George W Bush ("You're for us or you're against us").

NARAL leads the fight across the country to protect reproductive rights -- attacking them does nothing more than destroy your own credibility


by lifelongdem on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:27:09 PM EST

Re: Naral has about as much credibility (none / 0)

If you're not helping the Clintons lie cheat and steal you don't have credibility!

How can you be so blind??!?!


Slash and burn politics baby! Say anything do anything lie cheat steal railroad the opposition into submission: CLINTON FORMULA FOR 2008.
by crackityjones on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:43:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks on Obama's P (none / 0)

No one has any comment?

What is the story here?  If you don't support Hillary you have no right to speak and you will be ignored?

That does not sound:

a) very mature
b) very open to reflection
c) very democratic.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:57:33 PM EST

Re: NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks (none / 0)

Helen, thank you for posting this.  I'm glad to see the way they handled this, debunking the lies without choosing sides.


by Piuma on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:13:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks (none / 0)

Thank you.  They are ALL prochoice.  And anyone who suggests otherwise, or that one is more prochoice than the other, they are not telling you the truth.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:06:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Illinois NOW got it right. (none / 0)

Not true. Voting "present" is not supporting the reproductive rights of women.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 04:58:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

typical clinton response (none / 0)

trash the messenger when you don't like the message.


by highgrade on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:37:51 PM EST

The message is: (none / 0)

Clinton's record on reproductive rights is stronger than Obama's. Those are the FACTS.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 05:16:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response (none / 0)

There's really not much to comment on.

They all get the same ratings by NARAL, which means that voters who find this an important issue will have to go elsewhere to find out what their policy differences are, if any.

You seem to believe we should all take Nancy Keenan's opinion as the last word on reproductive rights. Sorry, but campaigns have every right to highlight their differences, no matter how nuanced they are.


by LakersFan on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:38:03 PM EST

Re: NARAL Response (none / 0)

I wish that were true.  But the real truth is that this doubt about Obama's prochoice record is being planted in the minds of women across the country and it is not true and it is wrong.

How can Clinton supporters condone trying to divide women over their reproductive rights, when all three are equally strong on this issue.

Personally, I find it heinous.

To see a copy of the flyer, go here:

http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/ca sperr67/?action=view&current=choicem ailerlores.jpg


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:10:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Link to mailer attacking Obama on choice (none / 0)

http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/ca sperr67/?action=view&current=choicem ailerlores.jpg


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:11:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response (2.00 / 0)

His record is different. It's a nuanced difference, but it's a difference. He's the candidate of nuance, so he can't be upset if others make it obvious.


by LakersFan on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:14:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response (none / 0)

And explain to me again how is record is "different."


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 04:30:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response (2.00 / 1)

Voting "PRESENT" is not supporting abortion rights.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 04:59:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response (none / 0)

It's nuance. If you support Obama you should understand nuance without me explaining it to you.


by LakersFan on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 07:27:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Naral has about as much credibility (none / 0)

NARAL was founded in 1969 to appeal anti-abortion laws, before Roe v Wade was ever brought to the Supreme court,  Since then they have expanded their focus to protecting reproductive rights and have battled Supreme Court nominations that were anti-choice, have lobbied congress, have organized women, have done research and analysis and support their state affiliates.

If Joe Leiberman is prochoice, then he deserves their endorsement..

This is a narrow interest group focused solely on preserving reproductive rights,

Next you are going to tell me that Planned Parenthood can't be trusted either.

Who the heck do you trust other than the people who have dedicated themselves to protect this most important right.

Must be a screw loose.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:05:35 PM EST

Re: Naral has about as much credibility (none / 0)

Frankly, NARAL has a screw loose by supporting REPUBLICAN candidates who claim to be "pro-choice" but then turn around and vote to confirm anti-choice Federal judges who serve for life.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 05:12:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks on Obama's P (2.00 / 0)

I gave up on NARAL when they insisted on supporting nominally pro-choice Republicans who vote for anti-choice judges.  They refused to even score the cloture vote on Alito, allowing Senators to vote the wrong way on the only vote that mattered and then cover themselves by casting a meaningless vote against the confirmation itself.

I really don't think a lot of these organizations really understand the game at all.  Or to put it another way, they're playing a different game than I am as a pro-choice voter.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:11:53 PM EST

Re: NARAL Response to Clinton Attacks on Obama's P (none / 0)

All three of our leading democratic candidates have done and will do everything in their power to protect women's reproductive rights.

This, like many others, is not an area where there is any meaningful distinction.  And we should all be very happy about that.

Any one of them will fight and fight hard to guarantee women's reproductive rights.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 04:33:03 PM EST

It's a myth (2.00 / 1)

It's a myth that all 3 candidates are equal on abortion rights. They're not. Clinton NEVER voted "present" on any reproductive choice vote. Obama did. Those are the facts, and there's no way for Obama to spin it any differently.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 05:20:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's a myth (none / 0)

Do you even know what a present votes means in IL??  Did you know that the prochoice community asked all Dem Senators to vote present?

Ignorance is our biggest problem.


Health care is a human right
by Helenann on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 01:56:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.