WaPo Columnist Uses Republican Talking Points to Endorse Obama

Michael Gerson, fresh on the heels of the Republican debate, reasons in a new editorial that a race between Obama and McCain would be the best for America. Obama's message of change is better suited, he writes, because Hillary's positions on abortion are too radicial-- "safe, legal, and rare."

Gerson, a member of the much frothed-over CFR and author of Heroic Conservatism, regards Obama as more honorable despite what he sees as Clinton's strengths:

Her health-care plan, for example, could be the basis for serious discussions with Republican congressional leaders. Her national security team seems more skilled and experienced than Barack Obama's. And her various positions on Iraq have always been slippery enough to avoid specific, hand-tying commitments on troop withdrawals, leaving her the option of responsibility (though, like the other Democratic candidates, she seems incapable of using the word "victory" in a time of war).

Still, he goes on, her candidacy is an invitation for reminisces of:

"I didn't inhale." Kathleen Willey. Whitewater. "Two for the price of one." Polling to select vacation sites. Baking cookies. Joycelyn Elders. Hillarycare. "What the meaning of the word 'is' is." Blue dress. "That woman." Lewinsky, as noun and verb.

Nevermind that thoroughly disgraced Jeff Gerth published a book harping on just those details that failed to earn money even as NewsMax magazine's subscription free gift.  (Obama might have acceded to the offer as his campaign clearly owns a copy of the book. He has frequently repeated a discredited claim from it on campaign stops.)

The Clintons are unprincipled and untrustworthy, he proclaims, likening them to racist Alabama governor George Wallace and denouncing them for their criticism of Obama's choice to be, "God forbid, ... defending Ronald Reagan."

And so, Reagan-loving abortion-hating, Gerson reasons that Obama would be the best choice for the Democratic nomination. In light of these new facts, I must rethink whether or not I am supporting the right candidate. I hope everyone does the same.



Display:


Re: WaPo Columnist Uses Republican Talking Points (2.00 / 1)

Bush's speechwriter?  I wonder if they'll be trumpeting this one on the website.

Once again, we see Obama getting all kinds of love and affection from Republicans who will never vote for him in November, but really really want him to beat Hillary.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:20:34 AM EST

pathetic (none / 0)

The fact that Republicans don't like Hillary Clinton is not a reason to vote for her.  Maybe you could just make the headline the more accurate "Republican uses Republican Talking Point"


John McCain is a Bush ally on Social Security.
by John DE on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:33:24 AM EST

Re: A Perfect Endorsement for Hillary Clinton (none / 0)

When Michael Gerson tries to say how great Barack Obama would be as the Democratic nominee, it's like a back-handed compliment. People in the South know how to do it. When they really want to get ya, they say: Bless your heart.

Michael Gerson about Barack: Bless his heart.


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 09:05:28 AM EST

Obama is Republican dream candidate. (none / 0)

That's why we keep getting this wicked witch stuff from all the Republicans. What's even more amazing is a lot of anti Clinton folks claim this is what demonstrates she can't be elected because Republicans don't like her and like Obama. You have to wonder what these folks use for brains.  


by ottovbvs on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 09:37:01 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.