Obama's trump card?

Call this virtual stumping I suppose, but although the media is fixated on last night's spats, video of Senator Barack Obama's Martin Luther King Day speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church is quietly spreading like wildfire.  It hasn't even registered on the big blogs yet.
 

I wouldn't have noticed except that I happened on the nation article linked above.

While cable news shows gorge on campaign sparring, Obama's uplifting speech is absolutely dominating YouTube. The 34-minute address from Ebenezer Baptist Church is currently the fourth most viewed video in the world on YouTube, trailing two Britney Spears clips. Not only is that unusual traffic for a long political address - people also like it. On Tuesday, viewers voted it the second most "favorited" video in the world. It also drew the second highest number of incoming links, a key indicator of web interest that drives Google page rankings. About 43 percent of viewers have come from links on Obama's social networking page, MyBO, which encourages supporters to share videos and information with their friends. Other viewers came from apolitical networks, both within YouTube and on other sites. At SomethingAwful, a popular general interest site that proclaims the "Internet makes you stupid," one user wrote that the speech was so good it was worth posting in a non-political forum, attaching the video and text. The single post drew more than 3,000 new viewers in a day.

The speech has now drawn over 268,000 views, after about 36 hours online. By contrast, a shorter, spicier clip of Clinton and Obama's debate clash currently has under 50,000 views, (after half a day), while a week's exposure gave Bill Clinton's Nevada complaints over half a million views on YouTube. But it's not only remarkable that so many viewers are choosing a long, serious speech over the political theatrics that dominate typical news. This kind of YouTube speech is also distinct because it enables voters to appraise a candidate directly, without any filters. News coverage is larded with polls and meta-analysis, while top bloggers increasingly talk strategy. Even the debates are often clogged with moderator framing and false premises. So despite our proliferating media, it's hard for most voters to hear directly from the candidates who would be president, unless you move to Iowa. (Or make C-SPAN your new appointment television.) But it looks like when the speech is available and the candidate is inspiring, people still want to listen.

You can access the video through the Nation link.  But what Obama has to remember so he can stay "on message" is that his greatest weapon is himself.  He took Iowa because people there got to know him.  Too many people in the other states haven't had that benefit.  Youtube may yet afford him the opportunity to turn the campaign back around.  As one pundit put it, "you don't get it unless you're in the room with him."  Now that "room" is around the globe.

Spread it around.



Display:


Obama's shameful speech on Sunday? (none / 0)

He should be ashamed of himself.

Edwards supporters should listen or watch ... "some bemoand poverty" ... Obama intones in that fake civil rights inflection he abuses in the south.

Clinton supporters should listen too.  It was littered with attacks.

That is fine.  Obama is a fast walking, smooth talking southside Chicago politician with ties to an indicted political fixer so his attacks are not new.

What he new is that he went into King's church and used King as cover.

Before each attack he'd use his fake civil rights inflection and cry out for unity, and then he would attack.

Then he would cry out for more unity and then he would attack his opponents again.  After he'd cry out for more unity.

What a bunch of total horse shiite.

Obama used King's holiday to make an overtly politcal attack on his two opponents and he used King as cover.

Shameful.

You have to be a total in the tank Obamamaniac to get on board with that bs.


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:33:04 PM EST

Re: GOP talking points (none / 0)

Much of Obama's candidacy rests on the idea that his speaking abilities can heal America. This rhetorically astounding speech added credence to that belief.

dpANDREWS, attacking Obama for delivering a beautiful speech will not help Hillary win. If you'd like to attack another Democrat, then go after Obama's voting record.

Otherwise, your remarks are just more GOP swift-boating of a Democrat.


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:39:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It wasn't beautiful (none / 0)

I challenge everyone to listen or watch, its on youtube or whereever.

Listen to the words.  

It was an overtly political attack speech.


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:47:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow (2.00 / 1)

How the cynics have risen!


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:48:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Check the transcript (none / 0)


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:09:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Check the transcript (none / 0)

I just watched it.  I didn't hear any mention of his political opponents, let alone any "attacks."  What are you talking about?


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:41:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It wasn't beautiful (none / 0)

It was better than any speech Hillary or Bill Clinton has given or would ever give.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 12:14:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: GOP talking points (2.00 / 1)

Sheesh. I agree.

I received the video link in an email from my dad. He even told my brother and I that we were not human if we didn't get a little teary eyed.

That's what is so frustrating about the anti-Obama movement. I've been to a couple of Obama rallies, and saw him speak years ago at a Dem fundraiser in Chicago. People get incredibly moved, inspired, and filled with hope after seeing Obama. I love introducing Obama to my peers. I like to share those feelings with those around me. I love watching people get involved in their government for the first time in their life. I love that so many young people support Obama. As a person in my early twenties, this next election means a lot to me. The economy means a lot to me since it's really difficult finding work after going to school, and having to pay off my student loans, health insurance, car insurance, rent, etc. It's frustrating watching my friends go to Iraq for the 4th time and wondering what to say to them when they leave. It's frustrating knowing my gay friends have less rights than me. It's frustrating being made to feel guilt when I buy birth control, when I can afford it. And this super intelligent man has a beautiful message to share- that perhaps we have a voice and it's ok to hope things will change.

Why that annoys people so much is a mystery to me, a sad one at that.

Young people rarely vote, and have broken records this year, even voting in primaries! And they're voting because they've been inspired by speeches such as this MLK day speech.

I don't think I should be called a maniac for feeling some hope for the first time in my voting life, or feeling inspired that perhaps there is a chance to make this country a little bit better.


by cecilybecily on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:56:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

It was a really good speech.

The tricky thing is that the YouTube generation is all in Obama's corner anyway.  The major challenge is actually getting them out to vote in a primary.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:45:29 PM EST

Yup (none / 0)

That will be a trick.


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:49:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

Ya know what this guy needs to be ashamed of? The fact that Zibignew Brzezinski, and apparently most of his spawn, are totally controlling him and his campaign. Check it out.


by jeanette3654 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:54:20 PM EST

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

What?


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 08:58:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Zibignew Brzezinski (none / 0)

Why Obama could never hope to win Florida (his Castro comments can't help either).


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:05:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Zibignew Brzezinski (none / 0)

I'm worried that Joe Baca's anti-female remarks will hurt Senator Clinton with female voters in Florida. Referring to another Congresswoman as a whore and then endorsing Hillary Clinton? That's sad.


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:11:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Zibignew Brzezinski (none / 0)

We shall see next week.

 I find your post sad, actually.  What has Hillary to do with everybody who is endorsing her (a huge list)?   And YOU are writing diary after diary berating others (and particularly the Clinton campaign) to talk about ISSUES?  


by georgep on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:29:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Zibignew Brzezinski (none / 0)

Weren't you one of the people attacking Obama because that conservative minister just endorsed him?  I actually agree with your post, but it is extremely hypocritical of the Hillary people who have bashed him for that and then get excited over the Baca endorsement.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 12:16:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Zibignew Brzezinski (none / 0)

Nope, never said word one about the conservative minister's endorsement.  Look it up.

Now, the McClurkin issue was a different story.  I definitely got involved in that.  


by georgep on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 11:04:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Maybe (none / 0)

I doubt it.

Bottomline Jewish American voters may pay more attention than any other voter in the country.  

Brzezinski is a problem for Obama with Jewish voters.

I think Obama has a real Jewish/ Israel problem and polling shows it.


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:31:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Maybe (none / 0)

That's a good point.


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:36:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Maybe (none / 0)

Second thought, how many Jewish voters are going to vote against Obama because of an endorsement?

About the same number as the number of women who will vote against Hillary for being endorsed by a misogynist pig who hates feminists.


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:46:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not an endorsement (none / 0)

A paid policy advisor.  A very good indication of where Obama may go with his admin.


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:49:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not an endorsement (none / 0)

"Paid"?


by horizonr on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 01:22:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Maybe (none / 0)

That more because Obama doesn't pander to that crowd the way Hillary does.  Of course the Hawkish Israel stance shared by Lieberman, Hillary and others is something that has gotten us into A LOT of trouble.   I'm just saying that Israel isn't exactly an innocent in the troubles of the middle east.  


by yitbos96bb on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 12:18:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I want a real victory in FL (none / 0)

Not a moral victory because we took a tough stance with Israel or offered to sit down with Castro without preconditions.


by dpANDREWS on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 08:56:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And this is why... (none / 0)

If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, we will lose even if we win in November.  This is pathetic.


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:00:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And this is why... (none / 0)

Why?  I think we will come out as big winners.  


by georgep on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:29:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And this is why... (none / 0)

But we will have about what we already have, Rovian influences included.


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:43:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And this is why... (none / 0)

Well it will be interesting to see how the next 4 years play out.  With the economy getting worse, the Iraq debacle, all the bills coming from some of Bush's projects such as the Presciption Drug plan, which is conveniently setup so that the big charges for it don't happen until 2009, and I'm sure there will be some surprises as well.  

The next President may be a 1 termer regardless.  They will have some very tough decisions to make and if they make the right ones, it may cost them re-election.  The next person may HAVE to raise taxes and cut some programs, etc to get things turned around.

The other option is to continue on with business as usual... if they do, they could get relected but it will probably be bad for the country.  

We are at a crossroads.. It will be interesting to see what happens the next 4 years.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 12:25:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And this is why... (none / 0)

Nonsense.  I guess it just comes down to how you choose to look at it.

 As you can see, the vast majority of Edwards supporters on this site (many who were extremely critical of Hillary) are now of the mind that Obama is actually to the right of Hillary on many, many things, so if they had to make a choice, it would be the choice away from Obama.  That should tell you something.  

Just speaking for myself, I think Obama is way too concilliatory with the GOP for my taste.  He is already compromsing on progressive values to get Independents and Republicans to give him a look, and I personally fear that with Obama that "extending the hand in bi-partisanship" would go way too far in a GE season.   So, in many ways I think that an Obama choice would give us a very centrist candidate.  We may win the presidency with that, but at the cost of Universal Health Care and at the cost of leaving the conservative wing of the GOP strong and influential, rather than relegating it to the sidelines (as we would see with Clinton.)  


by georgep on Wed Jan 23, 2008 at 11:01:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Concern trolling? (none / 0)

Is that what you call that?


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:37:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Concern trolling? (none / 0)

You're actually too funny to be a Republican...


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:45:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

From the speech (none / 0)

Obama:

"We have a deficit in this country when there is Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others; when our children see nooses hanging from a schoolyard tree today, in the present, in the twenty-first century."

... fact, Obama has nevered visited Jena, and he was strangly silent while major protests, lead by Al Sharpton and his supporter Jesse Jackson, took place there.

More Obama:

"We have a deficit when homeless veterans sleep on the streets of our cities; when innocents are slaughtered in the deserts of Darfur; when young Americans serve tour after tour of duty in a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged."

... a war he has voted to fund multiple times and a war he said he didn't know how would have voted on had he been in the Senate.

More Obama:

"It is not enough to bemoan the plight of poor children in this country and remain unwilling to push our elected officials to provide the resources to fix our schools. It is not enough to decry the disparities of health care and yet allow the insurance companies and the drug companies to block much-needed reforms. It is not enough for us to abhor the costs of a misguided war, and yet allow ourselves to be driven by a politics of fear that sees the threat of attack as way to scare up votes instead of a call to come together around a common effort."

.... Ah, John bemoans poverty but voted for No Child Left Behind.  Clinton wants health care, but says she will include the health care industry in getting it (Obama has received more from Bigpharma than any other candidate).  Ah, fear, because Clinton recognizes real threats.  Oh, and Obama voted to fund the war how many times?

More Obama:

"And that is what is at stake in the great political debate we are having today. The changes that are needed are not just a matter of tinkering at the edges, and they will not come if politicians simply tell us what we want to hear.:

...uhm, I wonder.

The fact is this speech was LITTERED with POLITICS.   Politics on King's big holiday weekend.

From the horses mouth:

http://www.barackobama.com/2008/01/20/re marks_of_senator_barack_obam_40.php


by dpANDREWS on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:48 PM EST

Your tireless (none / 0)

negativity is tiresome


Listening comes first
by Moonwood on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:51:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your tireless (1.00 / 2)

He's probably being paid by Karl Rove  to Swift-Boat Obama. In this economy, I don't blame him.


Proud Hillary Clinton supporter. HRC: right on the issues, right for America.
by Politico80 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:57:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: From the speech (none / 0)

So you mean Hillary has voted against war funding?


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:44:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

I thought it was a good speech, but

1) it was too preachy (of course, it was in a church, but still, that is Obama's overall style now.

2) speeches like that are written by speech writers.  It does not tell us much about the candidate himself, although he probably had some input.  

3) most people are interested about how the economic crisis will be solved, how they can get food on the table in 3 months, how they can pay their mortgage.  While speeches that transcend issues have a place in this context, and I certainly enjoyed this speech in its own right, I don't see how it can move many votes, even if it were presented to a large majority of voters.  Something with more "meat" could perhaps achive that, like a televised townhall focusing strictly on economic issues.  


by georgep on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:10:27 PM EST

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

No it's not his trump card. How many people are going to sit and listen on you tube? College students? He already has this demographic.

It was on the the news here. They spent about 30 seconds on the speech and said is was a message of hope and unity.

Here's the problem as I see it:
He's preaching to the choir. This is the second time that he's come to GA both to downtown Atlanta. He's more or less not expanding his demographic.

Bill Clinton is coming and speaking at Mercer in Macon. This is what more politicians need to do. They need to come to Columbus and Savannah and Valdosta and other places in Ga outside of Atlanta.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:44:16 PM EST

318 thousand and counting (none / 0)

In 24 hours.


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes it is (none / 0)

Obama's trump card - him.  He is a great speaker and visionary.  


Listening comes first
by Moonwood on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:48:20 PM EST

Re: Yes it is (none / 0)

And that's just the one video on Youtube.


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:44:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's trump card? (none / 0)

please.. youtube is not the country. most people still get their news from tv, radio and paper, not youtube.


by American1989 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:34:29 PM EST

True (none / 0)

But 318 thousand plays in 24 hours for the one video (not counting the other posted copies) is impressive by any standard.  Do you see any video by Hillary Clinton getting that many hits?


by Drummond on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 10:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.