Now, I'm a simple man, with a simple question.
Why is Jerome counting Michigan's delegates in the Democrat's flash counter to the left, when Michigan has no delegates, and won't get their delegates back?
This has the effect of making it seem like Clinton is winning by a huge margin, when in fact she is losing by two delegates.
Now, I could imagine possibly noting her victory, had she not been the only real contender on the ballot, and therefore, the automatic victor.
In fact, her victory in Michigan is entirely meaningless, so why is Jerome even noting it? and doing so in a way that artificially pumps up Clinton, despite the actual case of events.
Smells of bias to me.
It's even more bizarre, since he could just pump her up by adding the super-delegates.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 41 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.