Pumping noise into the Stadium, Drudge, RCP, Politico

Anyone else notice how these three sites bounce all their articles off each other to create an Echo Chamber Effect, and AMP UP THE VOLUME?

Ordinarily it wouldn't be a huge issue, but whether by political choice or PAYOFFS, the three sites all emphasise information FAVORABLE TO BARACK OBAMA and UNFAVORABLE TO HILLARY CLINTON.

This needs to be looked in to. It is collusion, and a form of collusion that suggests MONEY IS CHANGING HANDS.



Display:


Re: Pumping noise (2.00 / 1)

Don't waste time investigating this nonsense. You have to understand what's going on with the GOP:

Right now they say they like Obama because he is the enemy of their enemy (clinton) only to be dropped like a hot potato should he win.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 10:12:57 PM EST

tis all about helpin the GOP (none / 0)


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 10:20:29 PM EST

Re: Pumping noise into the Stadium, Drudge, RCP, P (none / 0)


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 10:22:29 PM EST

Re: Pumping Drudge, RCP, Politico (none / 0)

Luckily for Hillary, this election will be held in the light of day, above the "blog fog". But it may be the last.

The influence of internet driven information will be pretty overwhelming 4 years from now, and when several sites co-ordinate their message in the manner of Drudge, Politico and Real Clear Politics, it could prove decisive in an election campaign.


by robert ethan on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 11:15:22 PM EST

90% of media in the tank for Obama (none / 0)

MSM or otherwise


by dpANDREWS on Sun Jan 20, 2008 at 02:35:19 AM EST

Re: 90% of media in the tank for Obama (none / 0)

I know, it's weird, after Hillary won, there was a healine from CNN:
"Potentially troubling news in Clinton's Michigan win"-

today their healine is
"Potentially troubling news in Clinton's Nevada win"

I mean, c'mon, at least try to change around the title if you want to harp on the negative- what will the last one be?

"Potentially troubling news in Clinton's Presidential win?"

Blah- at least the voters don't seem to be swayed by them.


by reasonwarrior on Sun Jan 20, 2008 at 03:50:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Drudge (none / 0)

Drudge is the worst toward Hillary- I refuse to visit that site anymore.  For a right-wing tool who says the best case scenario is for Hillary to be the nominee- he seems to be doing his awful best to keep that from happening- the last thing they want is for Hillary to get the nomination.


by reasonwarrior on Sun Jan 20, 2008 at 03:54:28 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.