these could just be accusations.

And the spinning continues by the Obama campaign.

They couldn't care less that Limbaugh will talk this up for months.

It seems to me that after every win Hill has pulled off the Obama camp starts a controversy!

"she didnt cry for katrina, Obama is a fairytale, and LBJ did more tham MLK"

those were after NH

"voter suppression, closing the doors, id required"

thats after Nev!

COMPLETELY OUTRAGIOUS!!!!!!  We can not stan for this!

They have no right to talk about "irregularities" after what they did.

Those Clinton goons must have strong-armed the entrance polls too.  Bastards!

What an absolute crock.  First Hillary wins New Hampshire, and so they demand a recount bellowing about massive electoral fraud.  What has been found--hardly anything.

Then in Nevada, the casinos, which so many said were controlled by the union and would give Obama a huge victory because of it, now likewise vote for Clinton despite all the odds, and then the Obama partisans bellow massive electoral fraud.

See a pattern.  

Obama had tonnes of poll watchers and union members who could have fixed any issue in a jiffy.

This is pure sour grapes plain and simple, and very poor sportsmanship and character.

I wasn't there, but for what it's worth, there were reports from the Young Voter PAC that Clinton folks tried to keep them out of the NY, NY caucus site, and that the Clinton folks were challenging everything.

To be clear, the YVP folks were credentialed as press and were only there to observe.  They weren't participants.  

I believe Clinton won at that precinct.

FWIW . . .

Stupidity has no end in Obma's camapaign...

Get rid of caucus then!!

Typical whining candidate who will be deserted by voters in the end.

Well, it's smarter than making race an issue after New Hampshire. I'll give them that.

WTF? CNN is showing Hill to get 15 Dels and Barry to get 13 Dels.

Isn't it ironic that the candidate of "change" and "cleaning up politics" has turned out to be one of the most questionable candidates in awhile.

Sore losers at the Obama campaign, that's all it is. Move on to South Carolina. If Obama doesn't win there he's toast. Being sore loses like this will only increase him chances of a loss there.

First Obama played the black-race card, then the latino-race card, and now he's playing the vote fraud card.

He will lose Reagan Democrats and Latinos in droves if he continues to play the victim.

Obama is such a child.  He would be no where if not for the fawning of the MSM for more than a year.  And he has yet to take any real punches.

His "win" in Iowa came purely out of those thousands of bused-in and paid for outsiders, who had little if anything to do with the Democratic base.  Yet he was anointed by the MSM and blogosphere right afterwards--and he had a scant single delegate more granted him than Hillary.

After New Hampshire, the Obama forces went home playing the race cards and calling for a recount.

After Michigan, the Obama forces called Clinton's win--and the near quarter of million voters who cast their ballots for her--as being "meaningless."

After Nevada, the Obama forces hadn't the class to congratulate the winner--and 51% is certainly a substantial win.  If she didn't receive at least one additional delegate, that certainly is the Nevada caucus' fault, and not Senator Clinton's.  Such an allocation would stink to high heaven--and the strench would be with Obama.

Obama has been spanked three times; outside of South Carolina and Illinois, he is not likely to win again.

Thank God.  Let this Reagan Democrat find his own party.

They sent Jessie Jackson Jr. out the afternoon after Clintons win in NH to change the subject.  He flipped the race card and tied Katrina to New Hampshire and claimed that Hillary didn't care about Katrina victims.

An African American male connecting Katrina to NH, think about it.

Same thing here.   Obama campaign, the same day he is tied to the Rezco indictemnt, by the Sun-Times, talks about voter nonsense?  The state where Obama had the most union support?   A union that was accused of intimidation?

Obama has NO SHAME.

ID was checked?   So Obama is trying to turn Latinos against Clinton.   Hey, Barry, YOU GOT DUSTED BY LATINOS.

Latinos are smart.  They see through Barry Obama, and his friend, mentor and pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright like GLASS!

will do or say anything to hurt hillary and benefit his awesomeness.

after the disgrace of their charging the clintons of being racists, it is very, very clear that the strategists in obama's camp are shameless.

we will have to stomp them down and beat them over and over, we are game.

FWIW, I cacused in Reno this morning and the whole thing had a very festive and friendly feel to it.  No irregularities, no problems (except that they were not prepared for the massive turnout and had to improvise on preference ballots).  Our precinct was expecting 56 people and we ended up with 249.  I caucused for Edwards.  It looked like we weren't going to be viable (at which point both the Obama and Clinton camps started chanting for us to come join them).  In the end, we ended up bringing a couple of wavering Obama supporters to our side and ended up with one delegate.  Obama and Clinton got 3 each.  It was a great day.  Sorry to hear that there were problems elsewhere.

Oh jesus. I wrote about the confusion going on at my caucus throughout the day but this is really pushing it. It does unfortunatelty seem anytime Obama doesn't win anything, "there's some sort of conspriacy here at play"....how about at my precient where the obama head wouldn't give a clinton supporter a ballot because "they were all out" and finally magically found one when there was un uproar? Or how about how we had 60 supporters for clinton yet he only counted 48? Give me a fucking break. This is why you just do a primary in the first place.

Oh jesus. I wrote about the confusion going on at my caucus throughout the day but this is really pushing it. It does unfortunatelty seem anytime Obama doesn't win anything, "there's some sort of conspriacy here at play"....how about at my precient where the obama head wouldn't give a clinton supporter a ballot because "they were all out" and finally magically found one when there was un uproar? Or how about how we had 60 supporters for clinton yet he only counted 48? Give me a fucking break. This is why you just do a primary in the first place.

He had the most field offices, he had the big endorsement, he had the big rallies.

He lost.

He was so arrogant in defeat he flew out of NV like a child before the final results were in.  He is going home to sulk.  He couldn't even drum up an Obama speech to thank his supports and the union that stuck their neck out for him.

Now he and his supporters are revisting their strategy after New Hampshire.   After Obama got lazy and blew a huge lead in NH he cried racism.  He sent Jessie Jackson Jr. out to attack Clinton on race, and to make a bizarre connection between losing NH and Clinton not crying for victims of Katrina (she didn't?).

Now Obama and his dirty Chicago style campaign is pulling Obama / Rezco style sleaze and trying to attack a fellow Democrat.  I guess those Reagan Democrats didn't carry Obama  to victory and he is angry about that.

Is Obama the sorest loser or what?

It was racism in New Hampshire.

Then, he's whining about how his Michigan beating didn't count.

Now, he's jumping up and down throwing a temper tantrum about Nevada.

All while lacking the class to congratulate Clinton in New Hampshire or even show up to thank his supporters in Nevada.

What a loser.

Accustations of voting fraud against the Clinton campaign should not be promoted unless there is a tremendous amount of evidence.  Accusations like this should not be promoted just because you think it benefits your candidate.  

However, I would ask these outraged Clinton supporters why they promoted this idea that a union has no right to endorse someone other than candidate.  That the culindary union was mob like thugs because they were promoting their agenda.  That these tactics should be expected from a union.  Every candiate has union support (I doubt many  had a membership vote to determine their candidate - AFSCME did not).  Pursuing a political program is not manipulation.

so nasty, jesus. When it comes to policy all the candidates are practically indistinguishable. However the Clintons were a big fan of triangulation.  If you will remember they caved on dont ask, NAFTA, and Iraq.

BTW

Undies Sided.  What the hell is wrong with republicans crossing over to vote for a democrat. Do you want us to lose the general?!?

u r right!

The Clintons aren't doing anything but being smarter and more gracious than Obama is.  There are ridiculous accusations of voter fraud (WTF? - it's a CAUCUS!) and system manipulation etc. etc.

In the NH primary, Hillary actually came in 2nd if you go by theoretical delegates awarded.  It was Obama 16, Hillary 15, Edwards 14.

Yet... you didn't hear Hillary whining about how she was really 2nd, not 3rd.  

All of this complaining and false cries of foul are making Obama look very, very bad.  It makes him look like a petty excuse maker.

pathetic you are being.  Jesus, stop helping Obama swiftboat Hillary, you are losing every shred of credibility.

Wow!  You folks seemed to have worked yourselves up into one heck of a lather.  I have a radical idea, how about taking a breath, and waiting to find if there is any substance to these allegations before you leap to conclusions.

What is with your collective need to demonize Obama?  He has run what almost all independent observers consider to be a largely positive campaign.  HRC has been launching far more attacks on Obama, than vice-versa, but you are all acting as though HRC is some kind of victim.  I find your collective hostility difficult to understand and very troubling.

the mere accusations could taint Clinton's win going into South Carolina

That would appear to be the point of pushing the accusations.