DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman Chris Van Hollen took to Daily Kos this morning to announce some exciting news -- the first round of the committee's Red-to-Blue program, which seeks to raise funds in targeted races in which strong Democratic challengers are running in open seats or going up against GOP incumbents. The initial list, which will be expanded, looks like this:

Red to Blue Round One: Open Seats

DistrictCandidateCook PVI
CA-04Charlie BrownR+11
IL-11Debbie HalvorsonR+1
OH-15Mary Jo KilroyR+1
OH-16John BoccieriR+4
NJ-03John AdlerD+3
NJ-07Linda StenderR+1
WY-ALGary TraunerR+19

Special Elections:

DistrictCandidateCook PVI
IL-14Primary Winner (Feb. 5)R+5
IN-07Andre CarsonD+9
LA-06Primary Winner (March 8)R+7

As Van Hollen notes, this is the earliest ever that the DCCC has rolled out its first round of Red-to-Blue candidates -- an accomplishment that can't really be separated from the fact that the DCCC held better than a $30 million advantage as of the end of November over the National Republican Congressional Committee when debts and obligations are considered. If you want to help out these candidates, who include at least two with serious netroots support back in 2006 (Trauner and Stender), head over to ActBlue and make contributions to their campaigns today.



Display:


Re: DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List (none / 0)

I am shocked that they are investing money in IN-07, which is D+9.  They must realize how incompetent and unqualified our candidate here is.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 08:30:07 PM EST

Re: DCCC (none / 0)

They are investing there because they cannot afford to lose it.  


by Toddwell on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 09:44:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (none / 0)

They should have thought about that before they let our party insiders pick this candidate.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:02:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (none / 0)

By the looks of it now, Democrats holding IN-07 in the Special will be an upset.  


by Toddwell on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:11:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I somehow doubt (none / 0)

that the DCCC has much influence on how Indiana Democrats select their nominees. I would wager the Secretary of State had more input.


by johnny longtorso on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:30:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (2.00 / 1)

There goes Vox Republicani again, knocking a young, popular African-American grassroots candidate André Carson -- Vox Republicani is actually backing the GOP Right-To-Lifer (with "no opinion" on Bush's War in Iraq) in the Special Election! Shameless...

http://www.Andre4Indy.com


by Wilson46201 on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 11:18:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (none / 0)

And what does his race have to do with it?


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 12:08:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Grassroots? (none / 0)

Now you're just being ridiculous.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 05:20:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (2.00 / 1)

Vox Republicani is whining about "party insiders" choosing the Democratic nominee for the Special Election. Of course, Vox Republicani surely knows that Indiana law prescribes precisely that the Democratic precinct committeepeople in Caucus choose the Nominee? (Same procedure for the Repubs too) It looks like he is either really ignorant or deliberately misleading folk here...

I'm still steamed that Vox Republicani has been urging people to vote AGAINST the Democrat in the Special Election to hand it to the Republican "to show the Democratic Party insiders a lesson". Disgusting...

http://www.AndreCarson.com


by Wilson46201 on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 11:29:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC (none / 0)

What Wilson is really "steamed" about is that I am supporting one of Mr. Carson's primary opponents, someone who is a solid progressive with a record to back that claim up.

I have said that disaffected Democrats who were disenfranchised in the nominating process for the Special Election, Democrats like me who are sickened by an unqualified candidate who inherited the nomination rather than earned it, will be voting Republican or staying home.  Those are the facts.  How I vote, and how I encourage others to vote, is frankly none of your business.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 12:07:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List (none / 0)

It's odd because it's not as though you're going to dissuade the GOP from finding a candidate with early money, since they're already raring to go.

Put your faith in the partisan lean, I say.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:13:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Me? (none / 0)

Im no Republican.  My goal is to get Democrats elected to more seats in Congress as well as state legislatures.  Thats what I care about.  


by Toddwell on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:29:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Me? (none / 0)

I think you completely misread my comment or something.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:33:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Me? (none / 0)

Oh, Im sorry.  Im tired and wrote without completely reading the comment.  


by Toddwell on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:36:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

did we give up on ousting Gerlach? (none / 0)

I can't remember which PA district he's in. I thought for sure we'd get him in 2006. He only barely won in 2004.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 08:40:51 PM EST

Re: did we give up on ousting Gerlach? (none / 0)

Just got a candidate to announce, as I recall there are more than four potential dem challengers.

http://www.keystonepolitics.com/delegati on08/kp-exclusive-challenger-gerlach

BTW Gerlach is the PA-6th


www.payd.org Keeping PA Blue
by dannybauder on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:06:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

glad to see Stender on the list (none / 0)

We need to get her in Congress.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 08:41:27 PM EST

Re: DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List (2.00 / 1)

Desmoinesdem, I am a committeeperson in PA-6 (Gerlach's district) we barely have candidates actually which is kinda sad.  It actually gets in that my Republican state rep announced her retirement and unfortunately it is looking like Guy Cirachhi (Gerlach's chief of staff) may get the seat uncontested.  But as for the US congressional seat, I was surprised but out of nowhere two people announced they were running but since they are so know and now has a primary maybe that is why they are not on the list.  I don't really know much about these 2 yet (Their names are Bob Roggio and Mike Liebowitz, who lost to Murphy in the primary 2 years ago)  well anyway that is where we are at.


by steburke on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 09:01:58 PM EST

Re: DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List (none / 0)

All open seats with clear democratic choices for the primary not bad bets.

Thoughts on each:
CA-04 - Likely R, Doolittle dropping out was bad, period. However, Brown's COH might be enough to take it, I hope this one flips.

IL-11 - Likely Dem. We got our first choice, the Rs got second tier (at best) candidates. At R+1, this should be ours.

OH-15 - Lean Dem, Kilroy is good and well funded, the district is R+1, and the presumptive Republican nominee initially declined and jumped in months later, not exactly a ball of confidence.

OH-16 - Toss up. This is R+4 but Boccieri has been running hard for a year. Republicans don't exactly have knock out (but qualified none the less) candidates. This one will come down to the wire, but I wan Murphy to have another Iraq War Vet in Congress to double team with him, Boccieri looks like the most likely (followed by NY-26, Powers).

NJ-03 - D+4, We got State Sen John Adler. 'nuff said.

NJ-07 - Very oh so slightly maybe lean dem. At R+1 with a second time challenger who lost by 1% in 2006 and raised over $600k in 2007, I feel good about this. One of my friend's dad lives in the district, so I hope this one flips (My friend and I are in TX)

WY-AL - Likely Rep. Trauner rocks my face of. He was my biggest heart break of 2006, but without Cubin on the ballot, this looks bad. At least Colin Simpson is not running or it would already be over. I really want to be wrong here.

IL-14 - Leasch, Foster . . . I don't care, just put one of them in office. Just to say in two years we took Hastert and DeLay's seats is enough for me, and it should be for everyone else here as well. I'l be honest as an outside objector, it looks like Foster has his game better organized and could work the voters better to come out in the Special.

IN-07 - Carson, eh? Expect results similar to MA-05, if not a little closer.

LA-06 - Toss up. We got a grade A Dem running (even if he is conservative, but so is the district, remember, they are representatives of their district, not the democratic base in the North East). The Rs still have not announced a candidate. We might get this one, which I hope would motivate some strong challenges in LA-04 (open) and LA-07 (please come back Chris John!) in the 2008 general.


by Trowaman on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:11:17 PM EST

Re: DCCC Lays Out First Stage of Red-to-Blue List (none / 0)

PA-06 Likely Republican.  

Kerry won this district 51-48 in 2004.  The district includes chuncks of Montgomery, Berks, Chester, and a sliver of Lehigh County.  

Gerlach's base is Chester County, an area he represented in the Legislature from 1991-2003.  Murphy's base was Montgomery County, which gave her a 12,000 plus paper majority, but not enough to offset the swing area of the district, Berks County.  Attorney Mark Liebowitz is from Montco, Bob Roggio is from Chesco.

The problem is neither Democratic candidate has much name recognition, which is key in a House race, also it is very expensive to advertise in the Philadelphia market area.  Murphy had raised and spent over $4 million in 2006, something neither Democratic hopeful is likely to come close to raising especially so late in the game. (Murphy starting running since early 2005 and ran in the 2003-2004 cycle too).  

There is one hope though:  If the Democratic Presidential nominee is able to win PA-06 by a margin of 55-45 (which is very possible, given the climate in Pennsylvania and nationally) or more, then it is possible that the Democratic Congressional nominee may ride those coattails to office.  However this area of Pennsylvania is known for ticket splitting, so do not hold your breath on it and this did not work in 2002, 2004, and 2006.

I think the DCCC has given up on PA-06 for three reasons:

  1.  The district is very expensive to run a race in, as previously mentioned Murphy raised $4 million in 2006, an enormous amount (Gerlach had $3.4 million).
  2.  Gerlach has won three tight races before, all in Democratic Wave elections; 2002 Rendell for Governor winning over 68% of the vote in the district, Kerry in 2004, and Rendell and Casey in 2006 with Rendell winning over 72% in the district and Casey something like 65%.
  3.  Similar to reason 1, many national Democrats believe money should be spent shoring up vulnerable Dems like Chris Carney, Jason Altmire, Nancy Boyda (I know she says no to DCCC money), Nick Lampson, Steve Kagen, et al rather than pouring it into PA-06 and losing again.

Of course nothing is perfect in politics, one of the reasons Gerlach won in 2004 and 2006 is that he ran execellent campaigns and ran scared.  Campaigns matter and this is why Gerlach narrowly survived.  One of the reasons Gerlach only got 51% in 2002 in a district drawn for him ("the Gerlach district") is because he ran a very poor campaign against Dan Wofford.

So if he takes it easy in 2008, it is possible to beat him, but I doubt he will not run hard given the Democratic lean of his district.

Berks and a huge victory in Montco is the key to victory.

Here is how the counties broke down according to CNN http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006//pages/ results/states/PA/H/06/county.000.html

Berks

Gerlach 36,060 54%
Murphy  30,262 46%

Chester

Gerlach 52,340 55%
Murphy  43,090 45%

Lehigh

Gerlach  554 60%
Murphy   371 40%

Montgomery

Murphy  42,083 59%
Gerlach 29,853 41%


by TheBlueWarriors on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 03:12:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.