The latest robocall from Albert Wynn (MD-04); he seems a bit defensive...


[Cross-posted from Free State Politics, and also posted over at Open Left]

Well, this has to be a first. In my 20+ years in MD-04, with Mr. Wynn as my Congressman since 1992, I don't recall ever hearing anything so defensive from him as I did the evening of Weds. 09Jan2008, when I arrived at my PG County residence to find his latest robocall on my answering machine. Here is a transcript of that message, with some additional notes and links after the jump:

Hello, this is Congressman Albert Wynn. My opponents have invested in a massive media campaign of distortions and outright lies. Their ads claim I received vacations paid for by lobbyists. The truth is I was invited by trade associations such as the Railroad Association and minority business organizations to give keynote speeches and participate in panels during overnight and two-day business trips. Next they say I voted myself five pay raises. The truth is, that I and every member from our region voted for a cost-of-living allowance, or COLA, for federal employees. By law, members of Congress automatically receive one-half percent less than federal employees. I'm Albert Wynn, and I just wanted you to know the truth. Thank you.


My assumption is that this was prompted, at least in part, by the public protest and online criticisms of the recent Entergy-hosted fundraiser for Mr. Wynn. See discussion of this in a couple Matt Stoller diaries over at Open Left, here (pre-fundraiser notice) and here (report on the protest after the event, including a link to Stoller's photos). This was also reported on in PolitikerMD.com and WaPo's Maryland Moment politics blog, as well as on Donna Edward's campaign site. A couple other related blog posts are here and (via Stoller) here (PolitikerMD.com editorial cartoon).

A couple notes on the robocall contents. The "Railroad Association" sounded a little too generic, and a few Google searches didn't clarify matters - there are several organizations with names that contain that phrase. It's probably a trivial thing, but I may have another go at it after getting some sleep, more out of curiosity than anything.

What I am really curious about is whether that discussion of the COLA business was such a good idea for Wynn. There are still a lot of federal employees in MD-04, but as everyone knows by now, private contractors have been assuming an increasing share of the duties formerly borne by government employees. The executives of those contracting companies usually do quite well, but I wonder if their rank-and-file employees are going to have much sympathy for Mr. Wynn's argument, unless it is the habit of federal contractors to offer COLA adjustments to their non-executive staffs. I've seen some folks in these blogs who seem to know something of the demographics in this district; perhaps they could provide further insight on this topic.

Mr. Wynn is definitely old school, and it seems (IMHO) he has developed a "tin ear" with respect to the needs and worries of a lot of MD-04 residents. I mean, do any of you political professionals think that something like this offers big political payoff in the current environment?

Finally, for those really into all news of the MD-04 Congressional race, here are a couple links not related to the Wynn fundraiser or the robocall. This Maryland Moments blog post is more interesting for its comments, which include as a participant one of the longshot candidates competing with Mr. Wynn and Ms. Edwards. And here's an account of an 03Jan debate between the candidates, including Wynn and Edwards.



Display:


Very Nice Post! Thankyou (none / 0)

I contributed to Donna Edwards in 06 and have twice done so again in 08.  My thid contribution is in the works after reading this post and visitig the good links it provided. I do regret that the Gazete links do no allow for a Back escape to return to this post as the others do.  I am most impressed that Wynns only defense is to use the old Republican talking points that his special interest money is no different than Donna Edwards out of town money.  They always love to taint advocacy groups money and those of individual contributors as an equivelent to the  corporatists! I also note that the other Democratic candidates are clearly in the race to paint Edwards as equally corrupt as Wynn in order for the sole purpose of spliting the anti Wynn vote. Disgraceful!  Good luck Donna Edwards, your victory will bring us one huge step closer to a progressive majority in congress!


by politics64 on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 10:04:56 AM EST

Re: Very Nice Post! Thankyou (none / 0)

Thank you for your kind words, but mostly, thank you for supporting better representation for those of us in MD-04 (and all US citizens, in fact)!

As far as your problem with the Gazette site, I just tried the forward-then-backward thing (MyDD to Gazette, then back arrow click) on my system - a Mac iBook running a very out-of-date version of the Safari browser.  I was able to go back to MyDD from Gazette in the same window.  Is it possible that your browser is set up to open a new window (or tab) whenever you click on a link?  In that case, the MyDD diary would still be there, but "hidden" by the new window that was opened with the Gazette article.  [That's about the only idea I can come up with on the matter.]

Thanks again for reading!


Fight the good fight, Donna Edwards!
by MurlandGuy on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:51:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.