Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse

Bill Richardson's speech announcing that he is dropping out of the race is streaming live HERE.

He just said he will not endorse a candidate for president.

Update [2008-1-10 15:24:46 by Todd Beeton]:"I now return to a job I love."

Update [2008-1-10 15:27:25 by Todd Beeton]:"I will work hard to make Tom Udall the next senator from New Mexico." Huge applause. Tom Udall is there.



Display:


Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

By not endorsing, Richardson is finally saying "I want #2" to Obama and Clinton.


www.payd.org Keeping PA Blue
by dannybauder on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:26:26 PM EST

He would be a huge help (none / 0)

as VP.  

I wanted Kerry to pick him.


by dataguy on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:32:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

He annoys me with his foot in mouth disease but I agree he would bring a lot as VP.


by bruh21 on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:37:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

I used to think he'd be a good VP, but the gaffes suggest to me he might bring down the ticket. Biden at least got his gaffes under control earlier, and none of them suggested a lack of knowledge.

Now Richardson as SecState or a return to the UN, that would be awesome. And I would have loved to see him run for the Senate, though the Udalls are great, too.


The Wayward Episcopalian
by Transplanted Texan on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

I didn't really know him before, only knew of him, but watching him during the campaign I was not impressed at all, for any job, VP, Secretary of State, or UN.  I think we can do much better that that.  He came off as a real bumbler.  


by Piuma on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:43:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

Agreed. He shouldn't serve at all in any administration. Keep him away from the ticket!


Join us at Show Me Progress!
by clarkent on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:47:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

I think his accomplishments in Iraq, Sudan, and North Korea show he's good for something. I've also met him twice, including earlier this week, and he's very likable in person. I figure give him a good job where he can make a difference, just keep him away from the cameras and give him the heavy lifting, not the decision making power.


The Wayward Episcopalian
by Transplanted Texan on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:03:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

I forget the details but in one of the debates he admitted to making a huge cultural gaffe when meeting with Sadaam Hussein.  He doesn't impress me as being the sharpest tack in the box.  Leave him in New Mexico.


by Piuma on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 05:19:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

Accidentally showed Saddam the sole of his show (crossed his legs when they sat down together), and Islamic or Arab (not sure which) no-no. He overcame it, though, and still managed to get the hostages released.


The Wayward Episcopalian
by Transplanted Texan on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 05:42:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If it's Obama (none / 0)

I very much suspect it will be Biden or Richardson.  He'll want the foreign relations cred -- though Obama's probably as solid as a half-term frosh Senator can be in that department.

I'm not sure who the favorite would be, but I think I'd probably make both Biden and Richardson even money.... perfect backgrounds, good geographic balance.  

Probably comes down to who Obama gets along better with, no?

BTW -- anyone think the lack of an HRC endorsement has anything to do with Iowa bad feelings?  Scuttlebutt was that Bill was irate over the supposed deal, no?


by zonk on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 09:25:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He would be a huge help (none / 0)

I wouldnt want him as a VP. Because that would mean he would be the President after that. I prefer he get hired as a cabinet member or remain Governor.


by Pravin on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:29:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He is gaffe prone and has baggage (none / 0)

Wierd touching accusations.  His "tall tale" about being a professional baseball player.  Just not someone you want as your VP in my opinion.

A super heavyweight when you are making cabinet picks however.


by dpANDREWS on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:02:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He is gaffe prone and has baggage (none / 0)

Yeah, I feel about the same way. In the lingo of another presidential ranking site, I like his perspectives, but not his PR.

He's lucky he got to be governor, with the bad press he seems to get. Did you ever see his last turn on Meet the Press? He must have been dying inside. I almost was.

Forget Joe Biden -- Bill Richardson for Sec/State!


Always CTG
by Interrobanger on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:23:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'd like him to be sec of transportation (none / 0)

He understands the changes we need to make in that area. Smart growth advocates would be thrilled to have a cabinet secretary who understands the value of a balanced transportation policy, instead of what we have, which steers most of the money toward building new highways.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:25:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He made huge screw up of Ho case. (none / 0)

When he was Energy Sec. He behaved just like Cheney and they ended up having to pay Ho millions.


by ottovbvs on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 05:21:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

As I predicted won't endorse. (none / 0)

Doesn't need to yet.


by ottovbvs on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:29:23 PM EST

And as I predicted (none / 0)

he would not endorse.

Why should he endorse?  You piss off two, and make one happy.  That's crazy.


by dataguy on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:30:28 PM EST

He will endorse (none / 0)

It's just a matter of time. He's a politician who knows when and where the wind is blowing.


by richochet on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:32:21 PM EST

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

He should endorse Gravel.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:45:23 PM EST

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

LOL.   Now THAT is funny!  ;-)


by bailee on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:43:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

if he wasn't planning to endorse (none / 0)

then why did he direct his precinct captains to shift support to Obama? Weird.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:54:55 PM EST

Re: if he wasn't planning to endorse (none / 0)

Both campaigns denied such a plan. Its source is unclear.


by Nautilator on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:00:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if he wasn't planning to endorse (none / 0)

They may have denied it, but it happened...in my precinct as well as in desmoinesdem's. It was no secret across Iowa that it happened.

But, it happened primarily to try and hurt Edwards and Clinton so Richardson could make a stronger 4th showing.


by Greg The Wisconsin Democrat on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:16:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if he wasn't planning to endorse (none / 0)

Yes something happened, but who started it and how far it was spread isn't clear.


by Nautilator on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:30:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if he wasn't planning to endorse (none / 0)

It is what made sense in the Iowa race given the Des Moines Register poll right before the election showing Obama with a sizeable lead and him in 4th plance.  Richardson had to do whatever he possibly could to be viable.  Obama was to have thrown support to Richardson in precincts where it would have taken a delegate away from Edwards or Clinton.

Moreover, if Clinton won Iowa, the race would have ended that night.  She would have rolled into New Hampshire with huge momentum and steamrolled her way to the nomination.  

Richardson was playing to win, not to be anyone's VP.


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:01:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

Well, since I was afraid he might endorse Clinton, this is kind of a relief.  You could probably even make an argument that it helps Obama and Edwards in some small way.


by megaplayboy on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 04:49:29 PM EST

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

If only Kerry would have followed Richardson's lead.  What a jerk.

TrumanDem

Truman's Conscience


by DuvalDem on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 05:00:39 PM EST

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

    Say it Bill: More and Better Udalls!


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 05:17:47 PM EST

Bill out? Obama still in? Sad. (none / 0)

If Richardson had a 9 point lead with two days to go in NH he would have closed it out, sealed the deal and won.  Bill is a pro.   He wouldn't have let it slip away into a loss like Obama did.

It is sad to see inexperienced wet behind the ears candidates who are all flash and no substance stay in as Bill Richardson gets out.


by dpANDREWS on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 07:32:56 PM EST

Re: Bill out? Obama still in? Sad. (none / 0)

Ah, well I agree that Obama's loss was disappointing, but I'd hardly blame Barack for that.  Except for the dismissive and quasi-passive-aggressive debate like "You're likable enough, Hillary", I don't see much, if any, mismanagement in New Hampshire on the part of Obama.

The polls were wrong: Obama never really enjoyed such huge margins, so it can't be said that he dropped the ball.  

As far as Richardson goes, there was a reason that he never gained traction.  Even if he had polled nine points ahead leading into NH, he too would have lost. Clinton lead in NH for so long, and she performed remarkably well in the few days leading into the vote... not even Richardson could have stopped her.

That said, Go Edwards!

or at least Obama...


by magnolia rising on Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 09:20:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Richardson Will Not Endorse (none / 0)

Interesting item, with Richardson out that frees up his supporters. Several of them are Hispanic and several have jumped on Hillery's bandwagon.

Hillary has already been working the Hispanic vote and that will impact Nevada's the caucuses.


by del on Fri Jan 11, 2008 at 11:41:15 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.