We all are expecting this to happen in Nebraska.
Monday, September 10th, 2007: Chuck Hagel announces his retirement at the end of this term.
Next 2-3 Months: Three Republican Senate candidates announce and fight each other over who gets to be the nominee. (State AG Jon Buning, Former Governor Mike Johanns, Former Omaha Mayor Hal Daub).
One Democrat Announces (Former Governor and Senator Bob Kerrey)
There is a lot of Arguing back and forth as to whether appreciate the candidacy of Bob Kerrey or not... And while looking up some information about Bob Kerrey, I came across a diary post by "kos" on Dailykos.
Full Post Here: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8
/24/124053/185
Below I have Kerrey's 1998 interest group ratings. In parenthesis, I'm including Ben Nelson's 2004 numbers for comparison purposes. (Nelson replaced Kerrey in the Senate.)Americans for Democratic Action (liberal group)
95 (65)ACLU
86 (33)AFSCME (labor union)
100 (86)League of Conservation Voters
100 (67)Concord Coalition (fiscal conservatives, pro-balanced budget)
86 (81)National Taxpayers Union (conservative anti-tax group)
22 (34)Chamber of Commerce (conservative pro-big business group)
56 (81)American Conservative Union
0 (52)Christian Coalition
0 (83)
As you can see, 1998 Bob Kerrey's record is decently to the left of Ben Nelson's 2004 record. I don't remember anyone calling for a primary challenge to Ben Nelson for the 2006 elections (but then again I wasn't an avid blog reader back then neither). So it strikes me as hypocritical for people to be harping on Bob Kerrey when (from the records we can compare) is to the left of Ben Nelson.
Am I misrepresenting the opposing views at all? If I am, please correct me.
I believe Bob Kerrey has the ties to create a strong, efficient and effective campaign without taking away from the national scene too much. (Like Amy Klobuchar in 2006. Minnesota is fairly liberal so DSCC was able to cut her off rather early and she did fine when polling showed her up 20 points. The expectation here is that Bob Kerrey's name recognition and popularity can carry him like the state's blue tilt carried Klobuchar in 2006.)
What we should be hoping for is as many bloody primaries on the Republican side as possible. It forces money to be spent in the primary AGAINST Republicans rather than in the General against Dem's. Which is EXACTLY why Idaho is so important to the overall scheme of things, even though we have little opportunity there. (Except Laryy Grant vs Sali in District 1)
|
|
|
Permalink :: 9 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.