A personal appeal

"Hey John, so are you going to enter the race or not?" I asked back in the spring as I stood outside near my grape arbor.

"I don't know [my real name]," he said. "I'm thinking about it. Someone on the Internet is pushing for me to and the DCCC has called."

I told him the person on the Internet pushing for him to run was me. And I knew the DCCC was interested because our site meter on the old site was filled with DCCC.org visits coming in off Teh Google looking up information on him.

Some of you might remember in 2004 I worked hard mainly on the Kerry-Edwards campaign. I wrote diaries about it here (here's one example, my first ever recommended diary, West Virginia by DCDemocrat and Carnacki, appropriately on Halloween.

I didn't work much - some canvassing and phone banking for the WV-02 candidate in the 2004 race.

We lost the presidential and the WV-02 race even though we had better candidates in both.

I did all I could in 2006 for Mike Callaghan, the Democratic challenger in WV-02 to beat the faux moderate Shelley Moore Capito, daughter of the federally convicted former Republican Gov. Arch Moore. We lost big, 57-42.

I met wvablue (Clem here) at a campaign event and the two of us became close friends, one of several great friends I've made through Daily Kos.

Instead of quitting, the two of us kept working. We didn't stop with the 2006 election. The day afterwards we were already at work on the old site and with our offline meetings at Waffle House working to lay the groundwork for the 2008 race.

There wasn't a Democratic or progressive group blog for the state. So we made one. We tried to draft fellow West Virginia Christy Hardin Smith from Fire Dog Lake to run, but she did not want to uproot her family. (Don't worry, along with Howie Klein, we still have plans for drafting her for an office in the future, even if I have to forge her name on the candidacy papers...mwhahahah...Oh don't act so shocked and pretend you haven't committed election fraud in the past eith...you haven't? Uh, never mind.)

So I thought who would give us the best chance at beating Shelley Moore Capito in WV-02?

I've known John Unger before he ran for office and liked him then. As my State Senator, I've touted him on the blog before (here's one example from 2005).

In very Republican Berkeley and Jefferson counties, Unger won against a well financed and popular Republican challenger Jerry May (Berkeley 65 percent, Jefferson 67 percent).

wvablue and I looked at the math. If Unger could match Callaghan's numbers in the rest of the WV-02 and hold his own in his home turf, because of the high density of the Eastern Panhandle Unger would beat Capito.

Now John is more socially conservative than I'd like on two issues: abortion and gay marriage. Both of those issues are important to me and I'm still working to persuade him to my point of view on them.

The truth of the matter is in this district, my ideal candidate would get crushed. My ideal candidate wouldn't have a chance.

John does have a chance. CQ has just downgraded Capito's chances. The DCCC has named this race one of the top challenger races so they're committed and they wouldn't be committed if they didn't think he could win.

How often have those of us in the netroots complained that the Democrats don't listen to us.

John is listening to us. On many other issues important to progressives - the Iraq war, respect for the U.S. Constitution, access to healthcare for every one, protecting labor rights, protecting the environment, opposition to torture, finding alternative sources of clean energy, helping the poor, he's on our side.

So going back to those depressing days of November 2006. wvablue and I had several goals: find a viable candidate to run. We did that.

Get the DCCC in our race. We helped do that.

Get the Big Boys of Blogging paying attention to the race. We helped do that (clem is wvablue here. See also Kos's Capito's in the crosshairs and here.

I know a lot of us are disappointed in the performance of our Democrats.

But I know John. We've met with him several times. He's joined us at Waffle House and talked politics with us from the early evening until 2 a.m.

He's a guy who worked with Mother Theresa as a volunteer helping the poor and flood victims.

He took a year off from college to do it. Think about this a second if you don't think John is committed to making the world better: he was the first person from his family to go to college. And he took a year off from doing so to spend a year as a volunteer in India. He went on to become a Rhodes scholar. In 2003 he worked with a nongovernmental organization (NGO) called Save the Children that followed the troops in after the invasion to do humanitarian work.

Some people talk about helping others. John's done it.

The rightwingers in West Virginia mock Unger as "St. John." He has a reputation as an independent voice in the state legislature when it comes to ethics issues.

Meanwhile let's look at Shelley Moore Capito. Although she calls herself "independent" she's voted consistently with Bush and the most extremist corporate agenda when it comes to the Iraq war, worker rights, and warrentless wiretapping.

She was the leading recipient of Tom Delay's illegal PAC funds and formed a PAC with Republican Congressman Mark Foley while he was being a sexual predator of Congressional pages and she was one of three members on the Page Board. Her aides have been linked to Jack Abramhoff scandals and she was a recipient of campaign contributions from the Utah mine owner who wanted to reopen the collapsed mine back up for operations before the bodies were recovered and who has a history of fighting against safety regulations.

Capito is the Zelig of Republican scandals. You name it and she's in the background. Is it because she's clueless or turns a blind eye to wrong doing as with the Foley case? Is it because she's willing to do anything to maintain her seat and help the Republican Party?

I don't know what's in her heart. I just know I'd rather have John Unger representing me in Congress.

But forget everything I wrote about Capito and Unger. Donate to his campaign because I'm tired of her. I'm physically and mentally tired of her.

Don't do it for Unger. Don't do it for the Democrats. (Many of you know my thoughts on them. Don't do it to eliminate someone like Capito who'll vote for endless war and occupation.

Do it for me.

Do it because I spend two or more hours a day slogging it out at West Virginia Blue trying to help the grassroots and the state netroots. And a lot of my time is spent having to counter Capito's bullshit lies.

No really, if we don't knock her out of office now, she's going to run for U.S. Senate in the future - or governor. Who knows? She's the only big name Republican in West Virginia. And I am sick of writing about her.

Everyone else is asking for money now for their candidate. I'm asking for me. If I ever made you laugh about Wild Monkey Sex or smile with a happy story or you appreciated something I wrote on equality for gays, help me out here.

Unger is very close to meeting his fundraising goal for the quarter. As someone who helped get him into this thing, I'd love to be the one to put him over the top.

I ain't got no money and if you can't give I understand. But if you can, do me a favor and donate today.

Because I don't want to write about Capito after the 2008 election.

If you can afford to donate, please donate. Any amount will help. $5, $10, $50, whatever you can afford. I'll also assure you that Unger's campaign won't spend the money frivolously. I know because he's a tightwad when it comes to spending money on campaigns. People had to sign out for his State Senate race yard signs so he could get them back after the election. So a $1 in this race will stretch a lot farther (further?) than in other races.



Display:


Re: A personal appeal (none / 0)

Now John is more socially conservative than I'd like on two issues:

Don't gloss over this. I've had to do the background research at sites like SSP since you didn't elaborate. Bottom line is that you're running an "ardent" social conservative against a mainstream female Republican who is in favor of stem cell research and family planning funding, and also voted to increase the minimum wage.

You are planning to use her mildly pro-choice stance against her as the primary differentiator, not the alleged progressive bona fides of your candidate.

I might send her money -- with a cc: to Steny & Chris about their fundraiser (one of them is my congressman). I mean, who is paying the bill on these "majorities?"


by dblhelix on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 06:32:00 PM EST

Re: A personal appeal (2.00 / 1)

One more thing: It's a real stretch to call her "mainstream."

She's consistently supported Republican leadership. She's consistently supported Republican budgets. She voted against the Employee Free Choice Act. She continues to support the occupation of Iraq. She's sponosored legislation earlier this year to crack down on immigrants in public housing--even though it was already illegal! This past week she voted against flood relief for West Virginians.

If you were happy with how Republicans ran Congress, by all means send money to "moderate" Republicans. If you want to having a governing Democratic majority, she is a Representative that needs replacement with a Democrat. This cycle is our best shot yet at unseating her. (Plus, if we don't do it now we'll most likely be dealing with her as a Senate candidate down the road.)


by WVaBlue on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 07:02:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Uh, no (2.00 / 1)

You are planning to use her mildly pro-choice ...

Uh, no. I've never said I'm going to do that. Do you understand the use of pronouns or are you just an ass?

By all means if you love endless war and Republican majorities tearing down reproductive rights, the Constitition, etc., send her money.


by Carnacki on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 07:16:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, no (none / 0)

Don't be fooled here.  Unger is not a progressive.  And, he will try to use his conservative views as a wedge issue next year.  In his re-election campaign last year he attacked his Republican opponent in a mailer for supporting same sex marriage -- it is still unclear if the Republican actually did or not.  But, Unger was willing to use gay rights for political gain then.  

The folks at WV Blue do want to gloss over this.


by sharkboy on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 11:21:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, no (2.00 / 1)

sharkboy -- Um, no. As one of the "folks at WV Blue" you do a very good job of making sure "this" is not glossed over.

If you carefully read the article that you yourself pointed out, you'll see that Unger has--after further discussions with folks like us--had some real second thoughts about the mailer. Based on facts that you yourself are presumably aware of (you sent me that article), it's a real stretch to say he's likely to do it again.

Also, you are once again a bit off with your facts. He attacked his Republican opponent for touting a "family values" agenda. The point of Unger's mailing (sent only to registered Republican voters in his district) was to point out Unger had a better rating than his Rep. opponent did from a WV family values organization.

I'm all for a robust debate of a candidate's strengths and weaknesses. (For example, I'm fully willing to call out Bush Democrats.) But please, please, please if you're going to tear down Democrats can you get the facts straight?

I still don't understand why you are putting so much energy into visiting Democratic websites to beat up on a viable Democratic challenger for a Republican incumbent. If you don't like the guy just sit out the race. If you're happy with the direction that 7 years of Bush-Capito mis-leadership has wrought, then volunteer for her campaign. Right now you're doing a job of supporting it.


by WVaBlue on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 04:44:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, no (none / 0)

I am a member of WV Blue.  Your response ignores this simple fact:  UNGER engaged in gay bashing to win votes.  The very votes he touts as why he will beat Capito.  In order to win in his Senate District for Congress he will have to do the same thing next year.  He will have to use social wedge issues where he believes he is more conservative again.  That means he is not a progressive no matter how you try to dress him up.  


by sharkboy on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 06:51:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, no (2.00 / 1)

Excellent! Now we're finally getting some where. I can see where we have a difference of analysis from the same facts.

Unger won more votes in his district than Capito did in the same precincts. He doesn't have to win the whole district by the same margin he won his re-election last cycle. He just need to hold his own in the Republican-leaning sections of the district and win a majority in the Democratic-leaning sections.

Unger does indeed hold conservative views on two issues that are important to progressive voters. Carnacki and I have never ignored or hidden that fact. Unger also holds a general attitude towards governance and has positions on other issues that lead me to use the label progressive. For example, he advocates getting out of Iraq immediately and universal healthcare.

Those are the issues he is running on. I don't believe he'll "have to" use social wedge issues to win this election. [That's where we seem to have a key difference of opinion.] For one thing, I think his position has evolved a little since then (granted, not a lot). There's lots of other more compelling reasons, too.

Based on my experience in volunteering during the 2006 election, I doubt we'll hear much about abortion or gay rights in WV-02 during the general election. I just don't see those as  issues that either candidate will be running on.

There are three important reasons for that:
(1) they aren't high priorities for most voters in this district (which is too bad--I would love to see progress on gay marriage in W.Va.),
(2) there isn't that much difference in the positions between the two candidates (which is also too bad, I'd prefer to have a strong pro-choice, pro-gay rights Dem. candidate, but it is what it is), and perhaps most importantly
(3) neither issue is central to the job of a Representative in Congress.

Members of state legislatures have far more impact on abortion legislation and gay rights legislation than Reps. in Congress. [From a purely pragmatic viewpoint, if you like his stance on other issues you should try to promote him out of the State Senate and into Congress!]

Again, I firmly believe Unger will beat Capito because he is a Democrat with better ideas for the future direction of this country: getting out of Iraq, providing universal healthcare, using government to help everyone, not just the very wealthy. His positions on social issues help eliminate a possible angle of attack from Capito, but I just don't see him running to her right on a bunch of issues.


by WVaBlue on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 07:24:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

dblhelix -- some more research (none / 0)

It's not quite as simple as you've put it. There's a recent diary on SSP that goes a bit more into her "pro-choice" stance: WV HR2: Why John Unger Matters for Retaining the Majority.

Capito has made a career of blurring her positions--she is a faux moderate. She makes just enough of the right votes to burnish her moderate credentials, but she always sides with the Pres. when he needs her vote.

Unger's social views are quite in line with the rest of the Democratic delegation from West Virginia. If you compare the progressive punch numbers for Democratic Reps. Mollohan (WV-01) and Rahall (WV-03) to Capito, you'll see there absolutely no comparison. We will be far, far better off with Unger replacing Capito.

If you are a litmus test voter and cannot support pro-life democrats, then skip this race--put your energy in another district. If you are willing to help build the Democratic majority with a smart, hard-working, reality-based Representative who otherwise look goods to local progressives netroots activists, this is a great race to support.


by WVaBlue on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 06:54:24 PM EST

Re: dblhelix -- some more research (none / 0)

Question for you -- what is his position on stem cell research? Family planning funding in the US & overseas? With respect to her, I looked up specific votes (this is how she gets her 50% from NARAL).

I did look at his site -- no mention.

It seems to me that his most vocal supporters online are actually the single-issue voters: pro-lifers anxious to get someone in that toes their line.


by dblhelix on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 07:18:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He's pro-stem cell research (2.00 / 1)

We're single issue?


by Carnacki on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 07:30:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He's pro-stem cell research (none / 0)

Well, clearly you have no interest in divulging his positions.

Here's what's interesting to me. We have three 'top tier' presidential candidates running on UHC. Two of them have already disclosed that family planning and abortion care services will be covered under their plans. Two of them want mandatory plan participation. Democrats are boasting of increased participation by single women, minorities, and the youth vote.

What is going to happen when Unger votes on UHC? Will he block it if it covers services for women?

Incidentally, the posts at SSP were not authored by you, at least not under this userid.


by dblhelix on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 08:14:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: dblhelix -- some more research (2.00 / 1)

Huh?? You've got me very confused.

If you read at sites like dKos and West Virginia Blue you'll find that Unger's most vocal supporter's online (Carnacki and myself, wvablue; a.k.a. Clem Guttata) promote all sorts of issues.

I have no idea where you would get the idea that Carnacki or I are single-issue voters. Quite the opposite, we are pragmatic activists who are working hard to elect a Democratic Rep. for our district. Of the people I know who have written about Unger, I don't know a single one who is either (a) pro-life or (b) a single-issue voter.

As Carnacki wrote above, our first choice for 2008 candidate was Christy Hardin Smith (who live just in WV-03 and would have had to move). When she said no, we felt State Sen. John Unger was the next best option, despite our disagreement with him on some important social issues.


by WVaBlue on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 08:26:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A personal appeal (none / 0)

What I said is that I read posts at SSP.

From SSP:

The point I'm trying to make is that we need to take her out. As a somewhat pro-life Democrat, this isn't an issue to me

in comments:

I should have stated that, I should have put that a little better. I don't really care about social issues a whole lot,

From SSP:


John Unger is the only dog we got who can win this fight. Capito has left her flank open on social issues. Unger can exploit this.


But imagine the scenario if Rudy Giuliani is on the GOP ticket. The voters of WV02 will have a choice between pro-life Democrats and a Republican federal ticket headed by a Planned Parenthood Contributor and seconded by someone who flipped to the other side on the pro-life majority.

Exploiting social issues. Explicitly running against Planned Parenthood. Oh, wait -- this is Democrats. And you're personally pro-choice, but you just support pro-life candidates.

I've asked questions and get no response. Neither Unger (nothing on his site) or his supporters wish to discuss if there's anything workable about this.

As I mentioned above, Democrats are strongly campaigning on UHC and have been explicit about coverage. If the DCCC is working in opposition to this by specifically choosing districts in which to grow pro-life majorities, then obviously somebody's getting lied to, wouldn't you agree?


by dblhelix on Sat Sep 29, 2007 at 10:11:01 PM EST

Re: A personal appeal (2.00 / 1)

dblhelix -- Thank you for the great interest you have shown in this race. As someone that lives in WV-02 and is trying hard to turn it from Red to Blue, I appreciate that.

I am not trying to deceive anyone.

I think I've figured out where our source of confusion is. You have picked two diaries from SSP that are authored, as far as I know, by people who do not live in this district and who have each written a single diary about this race. I don't know them or where they stand on issues.

When you refered to "his most vocal supporters online" the logical conclusion was you meant Carnacki and I. We've posted numerous diaries at sites including MyDD, dKos, SSP, OpenLeft, Booman Tribune, and MLW about our district (both in 2006 and 2008). We founded West Virginia Blue to build an online progressive presence in WVa.

I would ask that you be a little more careful about throwing around assertions about who is doing what. There is nothing no grand strategy out here--there's just a bunch of volunteers working in a democratic (little "d") way. To suggest otherwise disempowers yourself and others from influencing the political process.

Finally, it is unreasonable to expect congressional candidates--esp. this early in the cycle--to have the same level of detail in policy positions as presidential candidates. [In years past even presidential candidates didn't have detailed policy this early in the cycle.]

That being said, a couple months ago I had a lengthy discussion with Unger about reproductive rights and gay rights. As part of that multi-hour conversation, I went through this list with him. He was supportive in principle with everything on it. In his typically wonkish manner, he had some relative minor caveats based on the wording of some of the items, but I decided he is quite supportive, not antogonistic, to contraceptive rights.

As I said before, if you are a litmus test voter that won't support a candidate who favors restrictions on abortion and (currently) opposes gay marriage, by all means support one of the many other worthy Democrats. [I fully respect that decision.] If you are looking for winnable races to help extend the Democratic majority--John Unger is a smart (Rhodes scholar), hard-working, reality-based Democrat who can win in this Republican leaning district (PV+5). He is a candidate that was recruited by both local netroots activists and the DCCC.

We welcome your support.

Clem G.
West Virginia Blue


by WVaBlue on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 04:48:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A personal appeal (none / 0)

For those who wonder about Unger look at what the WV Family Foundation 2006 Voters Guide by linking here:

http://wvfamily.org/pdf/2006_Senate_FVQ_ Results.pdf


by sharkboy on Sun Sep 30, 2007 at 11:34:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.