Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down

The Habeas Corpus Restoration Act cloture vote failed today 56-43 (roll call is HERE. )

The 56 Yeas included every single Democrat in the Senate, Bernie Sanders of VT of course, plus Republicans Chuck Hagel, Dick Lugar, Gordon Smith, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter and John Sununu.

Chris Dodd responds:

"America's moral standing, and with it the security of the United States, suffered another setback today, atop a pile of setbacks that has accumulated over the past six years. The outcome of this vote is both symbolic and tragic. Each of us in the Senate faced a decision either to cast a vote in favor of helping to restore America's reputation in the world, or to help dig deeper the hole of utter disrespect for the rule of law that the Bush Administration has created. Unfortunately, too many of my colleagues chose the latter, and my disappointment runs deep. But I will not rest my case with this vote. Instead, this defeat will only deepen my resolve to restore the rule of law and with it American security, for far too much is at stake - for every American - to simply give up the fight."

This vote demonstrated a remarkable display of unity on the part of Democrats, something not present during the Military Commissions Act vote last year, which passed 65-34. It's also notable that the endangered Smith and Sununu joined with the Democrats on this while Collins and Coleman did not. To no one's surprise, Joe Lieberman voted against cloture and against the constitution.



Display:


Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down (2.00 / 1)

When are we going to start making the Repubs actually filibuster?


by patricks54 on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 02:46:10 PM EST

Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down (2.00 / 1)

Can the Democrats de-caucus Lieberman?  It would be great symbolism, and so far I am not aware of a single bill where it even made a difference that he has caucused with us.  For that he gets an enormously important committee seat?    


by georgep on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 02:50:35 PM EST

Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down (none / 0)

post 2008, maybe


vote blue in 2008
by sepulvedaj3 on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 02:51:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down (none / 0)

Can't boot him from the club, but his committee assignments and seniority aren't set in stone.


by Lucas O'Connor on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 03:50:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

well (2.00 / 1)

Nice theater, but the time to fight was when 40 votes could block the law, not when you need 67 votes to override a veto.


New Jersey politics and news
by John DE on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 03:32:55 PM EST

Collins' "popularity" has gone to her (none / 0)

head.  That's all that can explain this vote...ego.

She let her ego get in the way of better judgment.  This is the mark of a politician who is already dead in the water but is too arrogant to see it.  

Susan Collins being a popular woman senator in Maine has made her think she is untouchable like Olympia Snowe (who, btw, is actually pretty far more progressive than Colllins is).  Well, she's not and she's gonna be beat by Allen.


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 03:49:50 PM EST

Re: Collins' "popularity" (none / 0)

The question is how good of an election issue this is.  It's not as easily demagogued as the opposite side of the issue is ("Democrats want to give constitutional rights to terrorists!").  It's a shameful vote, but I don't really know what the political consequences are.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 04:02:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Habeas Corpus Goes Down (none / 0)

I am a bit surprised that Collins in Maine and Norm Coleman in Minnesota didn't do what Sununu in NH and Smith in OR did -- try to save their hides by voting "independently" of the Bush party line! Maybe they have a defeat wish.

In fact, I'm a bit surprised that Voinovich didn't vote with us to save his sorry behind, but maybe, seeing the way things are going in Ohio, he figured, Why bother? Do we have a retirement watch list up yet on Senators with terms expiring in 2010?

Anyway, I'm very pleased to see Mary Landrieu voting with the Democratic Party on this one. She takes a lot of heat for being a less than perfect Dem, but she voted opposite from Vitter (R-LA)on this one and I'm proud for her.


by Woody on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 04:00:23 PM EST

Re: Habeas Corpus Restoration Act Goes Down (none / 0)

From reading all these posts by the "loyal" Dem base, all I have is this question.
Why does Reid bother? Doesn't he know that he can't please the little old lefties in tennis shoes?
by spirowasright on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 04:44:30 PM EST

Wrong comparison... (none / 0)

The Specter Amendment to the MCA is closer to what we're talking about.  It had complete Democratic unity - including Lieberman.  We lost him in this vote, and gained just a few Senators (Snowe, Lugar, and Hagel).  The lesson here is, elect more Democrats and get a Democratic President.

An interesting fact is that the vulnerable Senators up this cycle voted in exactly the same manner this year and last.  Both times, Sununu and Smith voted for Specter/Leahy's legislation.


by Ramo on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 05:27:20 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.