Obama's New Rhetoric

At the Tom Harkin Steak Fry on Sunday, the news of the day was made by Barack Obama who took a harder line on Iraq withdrawal in his speech than he had up to that point, when he said:

"We are going to bring an end to this war and I will fight hard in the United States Senate to make sure we don't pass any funding bill that does not have a deadline."

Dodd and Edwards had successfully put him and Clinton into the same wishy washy box on Iraq so Obama took the opportunity to break out of it. But looking at Obama's speech in front of SEIU yesterday, Iraq is not the only issue where Obama's rhetoric is changing. Check out this passage:

And talking to these Americans reminds me why I'm a Democrat. Because if the Democratic Party means anything, then it has to mean we value labor. If the Democratic Party stands for anything, then it has to stand up for your rights, and your future.  If the Democratic Party has a vision of America, it has to be an America where we honor the principle that Pauline honors every day of her life ­ that I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper.

Obama has been an amazing communicator of the values that make us Democrats and it's always frustrated me that he never makes that connection rhetorically -- that he's avoided stating why he's a Democrat proudly. This is the first time I've seen him do this, if I'm wrong please let me know, but this appears to be a shift, one that I heartily welcome. On one level, of course, he is starting to sound more like Edwards and of all times to do so, a speech in front of the SEIU is it. Obama needed to prevent an all-out endorsement by the union in the wake of Andy Stern's revelation that SEIU is leaning Edwards.

To do that, in addition to the rhetoric shift, Obama also adopted a more combative tone in the speech:

You know I'm tired of playing defense. I know SEIU is tired of playing defense. We're ready to play some offense. We¹re ready to play offense for a living wage. We're ready to play offense for a secure retirement.

We're ready to play offense for health care. It's time to stand up to the drug and insurance companies who've been blocking reform for too long and tell them enough is enough. [...]

We're ready to take the offense for organized labor. It's time we had a President who didn't choke saying the word 'union.' We need to strengthen our unions by letting them do what they do best ­ organize our workers.

All the while stressing his the central theme of his candidacy: ending the politics of division:

It's time to change our politics in Washington. It's time to turn the page.

Think about it. We've been talking about our health care crisis for years. Yet through Democratic and Republican Administrations we've failed to act. And we know why it's because the drug and insurance industry has spent over a billion dollars on lobbying in the past ten years alone to block reform.

Too many people in Washington see politics as a game. That's why I believe this election cannot be about who can play the game better. It has to be about who can put an end to the game-playing.  It has to be about who can put an end to the division and start uniting America to get things done.

Sen. Obama seems to have gotten the message that you can express partisan pride while pledging to bring the parties together, just as you can be a uniter even as you "play offense" against those that have obstructed an agenda consistent with our common values.



Display:


Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

No, for Obama mentioned during that speech how Republicans are joining him.  This is classic DLC, and I am not suprised one bit.


by truthteller2007 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 07:35:54 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

I don't see any signficant shifts. Virtually all of that rhetoric is standard fare in Obama's stump speeches.


by hwc on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 07:37:28 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

Then as you usual, you aren't paying FUCKING ATTENTION.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 02:31:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

Actually, I pay pretty close attention.


by hwc on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 03:29:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

I agree Todd.  He is shifting, and expect more, and watch for Q3.


by iamready on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 07:47:35 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

Good talk from Obama. We now need some action. No more war monies! No more confirmations for anyone Bush sends to the Senate. End this stupid and barbaric war now.


Can you say with a straight face that Hillary has been a strong leader in the Senate?
by AnthonyMason2k6 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 07:51:26 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

When you are low in the polls nationwide and when nothing else seems to be working finally embrace the Democratic Party. To me this is blatant pandering. If he cared so much about the nature and future of our Party he could have been saying that for the last 8 months. Obama is a Later Day Democrat. No thanks, I'm trying to cut down.


by DoIT on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:26:17 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

Well the polls that matter are Iowa, NH, SC, and NV.  And by December early Jan, we will have an idea which way the democrats will blow.  And hopefully not for lobbying lovin' Hillary.


by iamready on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:54:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (2.00 / 1)

Like JRE? That's good. What a team they would make!


by mrobinsong on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 09:15:04 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

I know it's already been mentioned, but didn't that SEIU speech sound awfully familiar? We all know that Hillary's been mirroring Edwards' stances (and rhetoric) on many issues, but this speech by Barack borders on linguistic theivery.

For instance, Obama said, "It's time we had a President who didn't choke saying the word 'union.'

Sounds errily similar to Edwards' line in June at an AFSCME Candidate Forum. Edwards said: "Isn't it about time we had a president who isn't afraid to say the word 'union'?"

Check out the clip of Edwards' speech that day. It's was one of the best political speeches I've ever seen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-YCjyirt 8A&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Edailykos% 2Ecom%2Fstory%2F2007%2F6%2F19%2F153420%2 F305


by ohiocrat on Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 09:54:10 PM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

Great Speech... I just wish he had done this in June or July instead of now.  

But we have seen strange things happen in Iowa and whatever the polls say now if an Iowa win or strong second propels into a New Hampshire win, then there will be a real dogfight.  If Hillary wins Iowa however, it is probably effectively done and we just have to pray things work out in November... The good news is we only defend 12 people in the Senate, so I don't see us losing the chamber even if Gravel was the candidate.  

Hope it works out for him.


by yitbos96bb on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 02:35:18 AM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

It's an improvement definitely but let's see what happens.

I want to support Obama, I like him better than I like Edwards (Edwards has better policy positions) but I need a reason.


by MNPundit on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 10:28:19 AM EST

Re: Obama's New Rhetoric (none / 0)

In the Ryan Lizza piece on Obama in GQ, they described how his campaign wanted to cast as wide a net as possible, go after politically uninvolved, youth, independents, moderate Dems and Repubs--non-standard primary types.

Then they would go back in and do more specific, targeted appeals.  If you look at his campaign, early on it was elites.  Then it was blacks (especially in South Carolina).  Now it seems to be working class Dems and maybe seniors.  The droning, detailed, policy-oriented speeches those voters like?  Post-labor day, we've had the Iraq speech, the Wall Street speech, and the Tax speech. The tax speech, of course, included tax cuts for the groups he's doing worst with.  His rhetoric on Iraq and the party in general shifting to appeal directly to those groups as well.  His approach in general shifting.  It's smart.  He's got a core group that's in his camp from here on out, and he's looking to expand it.  He was phenomenally successful with the independents and elites.  He's been trending up with blacks consistently.  If he has that type of success with blue collar types, he'll have a very formidable coalition heading into 2008.


by mopper8 on Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 01:11:55 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.