John Edwards reminds us of unfinished business in NOLA

I admit, it is a challenge for me to write these weekly MyDD posts in support of John Edwards. On any given day, you can find several well-written, thoroughly researched diaries by other Edwards supporters here and at Daily Kos.

Just look at the entries with the tag "Edwards Evening News" at Daily Kos. They are packed with information about the campaign and links to other diaries supporting Edwards for president.

Tonight as I nursed my toddler to sleep I lay there wondering what I could add of any value to this week's conversation about the presidential candidates at MyDD.

As you may have read, on Monday John Edwards announced

that he will be going to help rebuild an area of New Orleans devastated by Hurricane Katrina and offered supporters the chance to join him. Between today and the end of September, Edwards supporters will be able to enter their names in a drawing by visiting the John Edwards campaign website. No contribution is necessary to enter the drawing. In the beginning of October, five names will be selected at random for the opportunity to go with Edwards to help rebuild New Orleans.

For more on this initiative, I recommend Philgoblue's diary or the Edwards Evening News Roundup by NCDem Amy.

I am not entering the contest, because as much as I would like to participate, it is not feasible for me to leave my two young kids for days at a time.

But I am so glad that John Edwards is going to force the media yet again to pay attention to the disgraceful neglect of New Orleans.

I understand the political arguments for and against Edwards' visits to New Orleans in recent years. Advocates say the visits call attention to substantive issues of poverty and inequality (as during his "poverty tour" over the summer). He is also inspiring people to work for positive change (as when he brought hundreds of college students to work on rebuilding New Orleans during spring break 2006).

Detractors claim he is just "using" New Orleans as a backdrop to further his own career. Some people didn't like it when he announced his presidential candidacy in the Ninth Ward either.

Clearly the Edwards campaign sees some political advantage in this contest. Yesterday's press release contained an obvious dig at two rival campaigns:

"The challenge of building One America starts in New Orleans," said Edwards. "Instead of offering you a fancy dinner or photo-ops with celebrities, we're giving you the opportunity to create the change we need to see in this country."

I do not have a clue how much talking about NOLA, and poverty generally, helps the Edwards campaign. For every Iowan who tells me they appreciate Edwards' efforts to focus our attention on these issues, there is an Iowan who tells me Edwards is being foolish or naive, because most voters don't care about poor people.

One thing I do know: when John Edwards has visited New Orleans, the national media have had no choice but to cover the story, and in doing so, they have reminded Americans that we have unfinished business there.

In the weeks when John Edwards has not visited New Orleans, the ongoing devastation in that city is way off our media's radar screen.

I only visited New Orleans once, on a family vacation when I was ten years old. I would be lying if I said I had a deep sentimental attachment to the city. But I am outraged that so many people have been unable to return to their homes and neighborhoods.

During the summer of 1993, when a 500-year flood devastated some neighborhoods in the Des Moines area, I was living in the UK. It was surreal to see footage my home town on the BBC, but it was that big a flood.

I came home to visit about six weeks later. You could see signs of the flood in dead trees and some abandoned buildings (some of those were rebuilt later, others were taken down), but for the most part, everything was up and running again. Even in one of the worst-hit neighborhoods, the historic "Valley Junction" area of West Des Moines, businesses were open and people were in their homes. This was less than two months after the flooding.

It is stunning to learn how many neighborhoods are still uninhabitable in New Orleans. It is shameful, and Americans need to be reminded.

If Edwards had not declared this contest, do you think the media would be setting aside space in their October news holes to cover rebuilding efforts in New Orleans?

Thank you, John Edwards, for putting this issue on the media's agenda and making more people think about what our national priorities are versus what they should be.

On a related note, if you want to read more about conditions in NOLA, keep your eye on "guerilla vlogger" mbair's page at Daily Kos. She is doing a series on New Orleans two years after Katrina. The first diary in her series shows how "Katrina is every day in New Orleans." The second diary is mainly about a recent visit by Maxine Waters.



Display:


John Edwards reminds us of unfinished business (none / 0)

Bill Clinton had some nice words for John Edwards on Larry King, saying that Edwards is raising issues of poverty that need to be raised and speaking for people who need a voice.


by hwc on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 03:39:34 AM EST

Re: John Edwards reminds us of unfinished business (none / 0)

I'd love to see him land at HUD if she wins. He's got some great proposals that I would love to see put in into action. He's dedicated himself to it - I'd love to see him have the chance to run with it. We'll be a better nation with him in DC one way or the other.


by basement angel on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 03:42:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

But it would be a shame for the ... (2.00 / 4)

... serious pursuit of the problems of Energy Dependence and global warming and the need for universal health care to get kicked to the curb, since tinkering around with small incremental changes at the edges with those problems will leave everyone, but especially the poor, worse off than if they had been tackled head on.


The words of the prophets are written on the subway halls
   and tenement halls
by BruceMcF on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 04:00:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But it would be a shame for the ... (none / 0)

The poster was talking about Edwards taking the lead at HUD, which implies that he would be able to implement some of the items you are talking about.   I mean, seriously, say the election ends up with Clinton nominated, what is Edwards going to do?  Fade away from our consciousness into private life?  Would it not make more sense to get involved and help fix some of the problems?  If offered, of course.


by georgep on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 04:19:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

At the present there is ... (2.00 / 7)

... still the brighter prospect that we will not be forced to make do with incremental baby steps in response to three decades of unmet challenges.

If the "experience" we are supposed to be picking is the experience of failing to rise to the challenges that the country faces, I'll happily take the supposed "inexperience" of Edwards or Obama in winning fights outside the Beltway to the "experience" of Hillary losing them inside the Beltway.


The words of the prophets are written on the subway halls
   and tenement halls
by BruceMcF on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 04:32:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But it would be a shame for the ... (2.00 / 1)

I appreciate the kind sentiments being expressed, but I am focused on Edwards winning the nomination.

I just don't see what Clinton is doing with her campaign to show what she cares about.  
There are no big ideas, nothing to focus on as improving the country.

Edwards is willing to risk his political capital to keep focusing on what needs to be done.  

I don't see any other candidate that is as clear as to why he is seeking the office of president.

This attention to NOLA is part of that clarity.

I cannot imagine Edwards taking any position where he reports to Clinton.


I am an Edwards Democrat. Visit EENR blog for Progressives
by pioneer111 on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 09:51:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Back to the diary ... (2.00 / 8)

... since it would be a shame to allow what is an obvious "side tracking" strategy to eliminate discussion of an important topic ...

What is so refreshing about Edwards focus on New Orleans that it is not driven by focus groups and polls, but by what is right. He was focusing on Poverty well before the immediate Television images from New Orleans brought the issue into America's living room ... and he continues to return to the issue when a polls driven "campaign consultant" would be saying, "no, the numbers say that the top two issues for this week should be ..."


The words of the prophets are written on the subway halls
   and tenement halls
by BruceMcF on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 07:04:41 AM EST

unfinished business in NOLA (2.00 / 5)

I was in New Orleans only days before the storm hit in 2005.  The people behaved as they always behaved.  When I returned a couple months later, it was a completely different story.  The people were so sad.  Flying into the city, it looked like marshland in neighborhoods.

Edwards is the only candidate who has focused attention on New Orleans.  The only reason New Orleans still isn't cleaned up already is because it's a majority-black city.  Manhattan has been cleaned up and a new building is going to begin soon.  New Orleans is many years away from that point.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 07:09:49 AM EST

There are poor of all colosr in NOLA (2.00 / 2)

and it would really be nice if the issues of low economic standings be the understanding of it.

The attitude that those who are poor are that way because they want to be is a huge problem to overcome from the Reagan years.

Edwards understands the correct impact of "poverty".


Check out the New Progressive Blog EENRBLOG
by dk2 on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 08:37:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Excellent diary, desmoinesdem (2.00 / 5)

John Edwards is doing good in New Orleans.

The Edwards campaign merges with the movement for change.  The other campaigns are merely movements to preserve the stautus quo in one way or another.


by TomP on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 07:49:15 AM EST

Read this excerpt from Naomi Klein's upcoming (2.00 / 6)

book.  There is a reason to focus on NOLA and it's not about poverty.  It's about "The Shock Doctrine" and pretty evil people.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/090807 A.shtml

With John Edwards, everything and everybody is connected.  For those voters in Iowa and other places who don't get the connection, we must keep making it.


Join the Feral Cats of Freedom Coughing Up Hairballs of Truth in the Montana Underbrush
by Feral Cat on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 08:17:39 AM EST

Great diary dmd... (2.00 / 4)

despite the hack attacks. Thanks.


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 08:32:43 AM EST

Re: John Edwards reminds us of unfinished business (2.00 / 6)

Just wanted to point out to people that if you don't win Edwards's contest, you can still come down and help.  Groups like ACORN and Common Ground can arrange cheap housing for out-of-town volunteers.  Or you can take a working vacation:  at night stay in our hotels, eat our great food, listen to our great music, and during the day help people gut out or rebuild their houses and schools.

We need every volunteer we can get.


by ray in new orleans on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 08:33:27 AM EST

In Other NOLA News, Vitter and more Whores! (2.00 / 1)

Fun in the Big Easy!

http://news.aol.com/elections-blog/2007/ 09/11/david-vitter-gets-hustled/


by suzenews on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 09:03:12 AM EST

Ah, well, at least ... (2.00 / 2)

... the reporters will have work to keep them busy, following up the Vitter leads.

However, I doubt it can be leveraged into re-opening housing to allow NOLA residents to return.


The words of the prophets are written on the subway halls
   and tenement halls
by BruceMcF on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 09:49:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

tainted money (1.00 / 2)

He needs to return those tained investments which devastated NOLA homeowners.


Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 10:40:58 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.