Over at Talking Points Memo, Josh Marshall asks whether new USA Today/Gallup polling showing an uptick in support for President Bush's escalation policy in Iraq is statistical "noise or change." The numbers Josh points to read as follows:
USA TODAY's Susan Page reports that President Bush is making some headway in arguing that the increase in U.S. troops in Iraq is showing military progress.In the latest USA TODAY/Gallup Poll, taken Friday through Sunday, the proportion of those who said the additional troops are "making the situation better" rose to 31% from 22% a month ago. Those who said it was "not making much difference" dropped to 41% from 51%.
About the same number said it was making things worse: 24% now, 25% a month ago.
Given these numbers, it might indeed seem that the President's position on Iraq is improving. Perhaps. But take a look at some of the other results from the polling and the picture becomes significantly more murky. Specifically, the poll finds that "two-thirds of those surveyed still support [favor removing virtually all U.S. troops from Iraq by next April 1]", a number that is slightly down but nonetheless represents an overwhelming majority.
Looking at some polling conducted roughly in the same time period as the Gallup survey, a new Newsweek poll shows that fewer Americans say it was the right decision to invade Iraq than at any point before. What's more, the 35 percent saying it was the right decision is seven percentage points lower than the proportion voicing this same position just three weeks earlier, perhaps indicating that support for the war is on the wane rather than on the rise.
My sense is that a lot of this is in fact statistical noise and that while numbers will move up and down marginally (and perhaps even statistifically significantly) they will still show a large majority of Americans supporting an end to the war in Iraq in the near term. And as such candidates, predominantly Republicans, who continue to support the Iraq War will find themselves in a terribly difficult position next year when they have to face voters in their states and districts.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 22 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.