Congressional Republicans Call For Craig To Resign

Conservative Republican congressman Pete Hoekstra became the first member of congress to call for Senator Craig's resignation today, saying "his conduct throughout this matter has been inappropriate for a U.S. senator."

Now, Think Progress has the news that two of Craig's Republican colleagues in the senate, Sen. Norm Coleman and Sen. John McCain are following suit.

From The AP:

Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, where Craig was arrested, became the first Senate Republican to say Craig should leave office.

"Senator Craig pled guilty to a crime involving conduct unbecoming a senator," he said in a statement. "He should resign."

McCain spoke with CNN's John King (Think Progress has the video):

JOHN MCCAIN: I believe that he -- that he pled guilty and he had the opportunity to plead innocent. So I think he should resign.

JOHN KING: And suppose he comes back to Washington and says, "I want to serve."

MCCAIN: That's -- that will be a decision that he will make and most importantly, the people of the state of Idaho. But my opinion is that when you plead guilty to a crime, then you shouldn't serve.

These are no doubt the first of many Republicans set to call for Craig to step aside, placing Craig's hopes for a September announcement of his future plans seriously in doubt.



Display:


What About Vitter? (none / 0)

How can they call for Craig to resign and ignore Vitter's proclivity for prostitutes?  Vitter hasn't been to court, but he did admit his "sins".

Hypocrisy?  Homophobia?  Both?


Enough is enough!
by Bear83 on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 04:56:13 PM EST

Re: What About Vitter? (2.00 / 1)

Homophobia. It's really that simple. The face is both are guilty of conduct that's inappropriate for a US Senator.

I am not defending Craig, but the reality is that he's being treated differently by the party due to whom he had sex with and how the base perceives of it.


by bruh21 on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 04:58:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What About Vitter? (none / 0)

good point, but they seem to be hanging their hat on the whole "pleading guilty" thing, which doesn't apply in the Vitter case. Not that there's not a double standard at work, of course, but Craig's also up for re-election next year, Vitter's not, which is no doubt another factor in this.


by Todd Beeton on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 05:08:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What About Vitter? (none / 0)

Ummm... I don't know, maybe it's tough to find a Republican politician in Louisiana who DOESN'T like dialing up hookers?


by Tom on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 07:46:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Effing ridiculous. (none / 0)

They should butt out.  How does this preclude Craig being able to do his job?  I am so sick of homophobia promoted by the Republicans, not that a self-hater like Craign generates any sympathy from me.


by bookgrl on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 05:32:08 PM EST

Re: Effing ridiculous. (none / 0)

Sick of it?  The Republicans have pulling this crap for ages.  They have been the party of homophobia for a long time.  Why do you think Vitter hasn't resigned?  Homophobia and in Vitter's case, a Dem would appoint the replacement.


John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 06:11:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Effing ridiculous. (none / 0)

"The Republicans have pulling this crap for ages."  Well, of course I know that.  In fact, I would say, through the ages, not simply for ages.  But, yeah, I'm disgusted with it.


by bookgrl on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 06:20:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

September.... (none / 0)

One gets the sense that Sen. Craig will never return to the Senate floor to face his Republican colleagues.  He'll be gone soon, perhaps announcing on the slow news day of Labor Day that he is resigning.


by Arthurkc on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 05:33:39 PM EST

Re: Congressional (none / 0)

i dont want him or vitter to resign, because they'll be easier targets in 08


vote blue in 2008
by sepulvedaj3 on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 05:52:18 PM EST

Coleman (none / 0)

Gee, you think Smilin' Norm is thinking about his re-election chances?


by AC4508 on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 05:59:23 PM EST

Re: Congressional Republicans Call For Craig To Re (none / 0)

Ummmmm... We are talking about a 62-year-old man, not a 20-year-old.  It's hard to imagine a man his age being "confused" about his sexuality.


by Tom on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 07:55:04 PM EST

Re: Congressional Republicans Call For Craig To Re (none / 0)

Not really... McGreevey was born in 1957, Foley in 1954.  Foley actually DID admit to being gay after he was caught (read this), he just denied being a pedophile -- which he technically wasn't; pedophilia refers to a sexual attraction to prepubescent youths, while Foley seemed to be interested in adolescents.  He did seem to blame this on being an alcoholic and having been molested by Catholic priests, but, hey, whatever.

The main difference is that Foley and McGreevey both resigned after being caught, while Craig apparently intends to run for reelection.


by Tom on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 08:14:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Congressional Republicans Call For Craig To Re (none / 0)

Foley in 2004, when rumors started to surface that he was gay when he was running for the Senate, said something to the effect of "I'm not going to discuss my sexuality".  That's really too ambiguous to be saying that he's not gay.

I'm not predicting that Craig will eventually call himself gay... though maybe he will, I don't know, maybe there will be some big retirement press conference/coming out party in his future.  All I'm saying is that most heterosexual men don't go looking for sex with other men in bathrooms.  I'd like to know what Mrs. Craig thinks of all this.


by Tom on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 09:19:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Congressional Republicans Call For Craig To Re (none / 0)

maybe he can hire Haggard to pray the gay away, I hear he's looking for work.


by Todd Beeton on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 09:06:57 PM EST

Re: (none / 0)

Add this to the never-ending chronicle of repub. hypocrisy.  At the same time, i can't quite help feeling sorry for the guy on a personal level.  It must be really difficult being in a culture, party, and position that makes it basically impossible to express your minority sexuality.  I guess on the other hand, coming out's not a party for anyone, and most of us don't have the responsibility of crafting policy.  what a sad life...  


by bluedavid on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 11:47:41 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.