What's a Blog For?

Last weekend, I wrote about how the progressive youth movement - its organizations and its individual members - were disconnected from the progressive blogosphere.  I got some pushback in the comments and elsewhere about that, with criticism generally raising two questions:

  • Why do youth groups need to engage the blogosphere?

  • How could existing youth org blogs change to make most effective use of the medium?

There's no one answer to the first question.  Not all youth orgs need to engage the blogs, and for different youth orgs, it would make sense to engage different types of blogs for different reasons.  As Matt noted in the comments to my post last year, the blogosphere isn't any one thing, and lumping all blogs in together and saying that "youth orgs need to know what's going on" isn't all that helpful.  Reading the Daily Kos every day isn't going to make our youth organizations or their members any more effective than they already are.   There are many types of blogs written for a variety of purposes by a diverse range of people.  Some of these will be helpful for youth orgs, some won't.  

The Young Democrats, for example, have chapters all over the country.  Typically their work (canvassing and GOTVing young voters) is supportive of local candidacies, and often they work on local issues that can be aided by help from the broader progressive community in that area.  It would make sense for local chapters to have their own blog (and in fairness, many of them do) that covered YDA Chapter X's involvement in their local politics.  It would make sense for that blog to be in dialogue with local blogs about local issues.  There are partnerships to be formed there, local media narratives to change/establish, volunteers to be recruited, etc.  And it's a relationship that could go both ways, benefiting the local blogs, local progressives, and young progressives equally.  Such a relationship would also help de-"ghettoize" youth politics, which is frequently siloed away from the activities of the "adults."  

Another organization, The Roosevelt Institution, for instance, probably won't care so much about what YDA is doing or about local candidates.  But they're probably very interested in what policy bloggers are talking about.  Reading Ezra Klein, Max Sawicky, Brad DeLong, etc. would be instructional for a lot of RI's aspiring policy wonks.  In this case, the benefits are educational - reading the blogs and creating a forum for discussion on the organization's own blog serves to educate all members about the intricacies of various policy issues.  It will also probably increase their familiarity with the D.C. policy world.  

I'm not going to run through each type of organization and what might work best, but there are clearly benefits to be gained for youth organizations to selectively engage the blogosphere based on their goals.  The second question - how can existing blogs change to better serve their members and utilize the medium - is the more interesting one to me.

I see two ways that youth organizations can (more) effectively make use of their own blogs - by radically increasing the transparency of their organization and by creating connective tissue between the various bits and pieces of progressive youth organizing.

Transparency
Most nonprofit and political organizations are fairly opaque.  Information about what is going on behind the scenes, what the national and/or paid staff actually does on a day to day basis, questions about the past, present, and future of the organization, details about long-term and short-term strategy: these are things that are not discussed on your average organizational website.  That's because we're all trained to think that what we're doing on a daily basis either isn't news or is top secret and private.  But radical transparency can offer organizations a number of benefits.

If the goal is to engage more young people in politics, transparency can give members greater feelings of ownership over the organization.  It can help them understand what it takes to start/run/sustain a political or nonprofit organization.  It can also protect against the potential fraud and abuse that Matt noted in his comments to my post last week.  If an organization's operations are out in the open - and everyone knows how and why you are pursuing certain projects or executing specific strategies - it is much more difficult to hide bad practices or "fake it."

This applies to the membership as well.  An excellent use of an organizational blog would be to highlight the best practices of your members (and on the flip side, deconstruct the failures, faux-pas and worst practices of the membership as well).  If I'm thinking of starting a newspaper on campus, it would be great to go to Campus Progress and see folks who recently did so writing about the challenges they overcame, pitfalls they avoided (or stepped in), etc.

Breaking Silos
Another reason for youth organizations to maintain their own blog is to create a more self-aware, more connected progressive youth movement.  Right now, I see very little connective tissue between the many different organizations that comprise progressive youth organizing.  Don't get me wrong - people link.  There are innumerable "partner" pages filled with hyperlinks and some uninspiring language about leadership training or grassroots organizing.  But let's be honest - how many visitors to an organization's website actually read those blurbs?  Of that percentage, how many click through?  Of that percentage how many actually become involved or take the time to learn and follow the workings of that "partner" organization?  Probably not a lot.  

Don't get me wrong, there are real partnerships.  A number of organizations including Young  People For, The League, USSA, Movement Strategies Center and the Center for Progressive Leadership participate in a partnership known as the Generational Alliance (not to be confused with the Next Generation Alliance).  The alliance's activities mainly consist of joint fundraising for each of their core competencies, but beyond that, it's hard to know what they do.  If you're a college student just signing up, you probably wouldn't know about them at all.

This isn't to say that what they do is bad, it's to say that their activities - their partnership and the movement they are building together - are not transparent.  They're not building a narrative together about the progressive youth movement, and they're not presenting that larger narrative to their members.  To be sure, there are overlaps in membership, and national staff move promising organizers between the various training programs and activities each group offers, but the lack of transparency means that new people coming in are de facto out of the loop.  It's not obvious how all the pieces are working together, or even what all the pieces are.

Creating transparency in the organization is the first step.  The second step is to report on what other organizations are doing (which you will know because they will be reporting it on their blog) and how it fits with your own work.  Build a larger narrative about how all the pieces of the progressive youth movement fit together, so that anyone - from newbie to veteran, Young Democrat to Young People For Fellow - can readily become aware of the diversity of organizations and opportunities available to them, and find the best place to learn and contribute.  

For years now, Campus Progress has run a great series educating its members about the Right Wing.  It should be just as easy to learn about the progressive (youth) movement.  Blogs can help with that, and I think it'd be a worthwhile use of time and resources for our youth organizations.



Display:


Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

Mike- thanks for the follow up post on this. I still think it's worth noting, however, that just because staff and/or volunteer bloggers for these organizational blogs are not discussing or linking to major progressive blogs like this one does not mean that they are not reading them, and it certainly does not mean that their members/activists/trainees are not reading them and even participating actively.  

One explanation why there may be a small amount of discussion of the larger blogs on some of these smaller org blogs could be that the org bloggers are trying to differentiate themselves and come up with material that is different from what is already covered and relevant to their constituency groups.  

Another factor is that many of these nonprofit organizations, because of their tax status, are (overly)cautious about posting a lot of the partisan messages that are covered elsewhere in the blogosphere.  I think the YP4.org blog has a good solution for this, since they make it clear that the opinions of individual bloggers are not representative of the organization.        


by TJ Helm on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 03:34:31 PM EST

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

That's certainly a possibility, but again, it's not really about the major blogs for me (or at least not as my thinking on this is evolving).  It's really about the local blogs (YDA faces no serious institutional barriers to talking with local blogs.  Left in the West and Young Philly Politics are great models here for how they might benefit), and niche blogs (like the policy blogs/Roosevelt example).

Individual people may or may not participate, as you suggest, but what I'm really talking about here is making such things institutional practice, encouraged by the org to their memberships.

Additionally, I really think the points I made above about transparency and creating a larger narrative/connective tissue to the movement are much more important uses of blogs than keeping abreast of blogosphere chatter.  This is a refinement of my post from last week, and this point is actually somewhat changed based on comments and conversations I've had since then.

Your point about tax status is valid, but I find it is often an excuse.  Those rules sound strict, but they're actually pretty lax in practice, and I find that many non profits on the left are overly cautious, where as groups on the Right have shown us just how much room there is to maneuver around the semantic contortions necessitated by 501c guidelines.  

Additionally, if YP4's little discaimer is suitable (and there is no reason to believe it is not), then the point is moot anyway.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 04:43:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

I agree with some of your points on transparency and narrative, and I agree that many on the left are (extremely) overly cautious about political activity/tax status issues. I simply brought it up because it might provide insight into the minds of those who run these organizations.  

Worth mentioning, however, is that the left is more cautious than the right because the administration is currently Republican and therefore controls the IRS, etc.  And it's not like they haven't already tried coming after many of our organizations (NAACP comes to mind).  We have to be more cautious than they do right now.  


by TJ Helm on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 05:48:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

That's true.  They've been doing it since the Reagan Administration when the "defund the left" strategy first came into common practice (on campus and in the Beltway).

It's also worth noting that they've never succeeded.    In part because success would rob them of their own support structures.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 07:31:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

As a student affiliated with Roosevelt I can understand your point. I think part of the problem is the generally diffuse character of youth organizations and the ensuing difficulty of getting a message across on blogs. Probably many students who post on blogs are (like me) part of one or several different types of progressive groups, but (or maybe "thus") it's not necessarily intuitive to post as a member of group X or Y, or on that group's blog.

The point about tax status is also important, of course.


by olivert on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 03:55:47 PM EST

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

I'm not sure I follow, but let me try to respond and hopefully I'm not misinterpreting.

I'm not sure what you mean at all by this:

I think part of the problem is the generally diffuse character of youth organizations and the ensuing difficulty of getting a message across on blogs.

As to your other point, the goal of any good organization should be to grow it's membership while still performing its tasks well.  Usually those go hand in hand, but not always.  Students like you who participate in multiple blogs/orgs are the exception, not the rule.  Our orgs need to be friendly, approachable, understandable, and easy to join/contribute to for those much less involved than you.  I think my points about transparency and building a larger narrative speak to how we get those others involved as much as possible.  

As one of the most involved, I would hope that someone like you would be the low-hanging fruit for a strategy to start implementing the changes I outlined above.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 04:47:59 PM EST

Re: What's a Blog For? (none / 0)

Good points, man. Keep on beating the drum.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 06:14:32 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.