Senator Barack Obama has a new radio ad in South Carolina.
The ads says:
"It's Barack Obama time. A Christian family man, community organizer, civil rights lawyer, courageous legislator, and U.S. senator who's told the truth as a soldier for justice."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/200 7/07/24/new-ad-calls-obama-soldier-for-j ustice/
It's just an ad, but one phrase jumped out at me: "A Christian family man."
It reminds me a bit of Harold Ford's senatorial campaign in 2006 in Tennessee. He also made a big deal about being a Christian. That also failed in a southern state.
More after the fold.
I don't want to make more out of this than it is. I understand all the leading contenders are Christians of one sort or another.
Certainly John Edwards makes no secret of the fact that his religious values inform his views regarding the dignity of all people and the need to do something about poverty in this nation. Hillary Clinton attended prayer breakfasts in the Senate.
I have no doubt that John Edwards is a good family man and Hillary Clinton is a good family woman. Both have and are raising children. John Edwards has young children and an young adult child. Hillary Clinton has a child who is an adult, but as a parent, you never are done. I have no doubt that both are loving and good parents and are devout in their faith. And they are Christians. But so far, neither has made advertisements to my knowledge trumpeting that they are Christians.
A "Christian family man" -- that's a new theme for a Democratic Presidential candidate. What does that really mean in the context of South Carolina culture? What is he trying to say? With $50 million or so raised, I am sure he has hired the top in advertising minds. The word choices likely are no accident.
He wants South Carolinians to know: (1) he is a Christian and (2) he is a family man.
Is this a subtle hit on Bill Clinton? Is Obama subtly referring to Lewinsky here? "Family men" stay at home and avoid sex with other women. Hmmm. What do you think?
I am not uncomfortable with Democrats talking about their religious beliefs. I am vaguely uncomfortable about this. It reminds me of Republican attempts to appropriate religion for political purposes, an action that some in the Christian tradition describe as idolatry, and others see as divisive. If a Republican made this ad and said he was a "Christian family man," I would make fun of it. Should I have a double standard for a Democrat?
In my view, God, if he or she exists, is not a Democrat or Republican. As being a "family man," I can think of many family men who don't cheat on their wives and raise their children, but who would be lousy presidents.
As one who was raised Catholic, but who is more Buddhist and agnostic than anything, I also have family values. I do not see that Christian family values are any different than my family values, except maybe Falwell's values, but I think he was not very Christian. I am a "family man" also. I have helped raise a wonderful daughter.
Should Presidential candidates have advertisements proclaiming that they are Christians? That they are family men? Do you like this?
Now I expect a few Obama supporters may love the ad and tell me how he is the new Reagan, but what about the rest of you. What do you think? If your candidate did it, would you like it?
|
|
|
Permalink :: 33 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.