Dem Committees Nearly Double GOP in Cash-on-Hand

I've been doing some apartment hunting today down in the Bay area (more on that later...), so I haven't been able to post this yet, but PoliticalMoneyLine has just posted the end of June campaign finance reports for all of the Democratic and Republican party committees. As you'll see, the numbers are quite remarkable.

CommitteeJune ReceiptsJune DisbursementsJune Cash-on-HandJune Debts & Obligations
DSCC$8,558,882$2,458,758$20,359,758$500,000
$4,500,000
NRSC$3,447,569$1,953,255$5,756,425$0
DCCC$10,389,953.86$2,416,533.24$19,503,898$4,143,957
NRCC$5,901,290$5,721,963$2,006,038$4,350,000
DNC$4,160,296$4,963,583$4,667,965$2,000,000
RNC$6,584,384 $5,723,213$15,899,563$0
Total
Democrats
$23,109,131.86$9,838,874.24$44,531,621$6,643,957
Total
Republicans
$15,933,243$13,398,431$23,662,026$4,350,000

If you check out the numbers from April and May, and compare them to the latest numbers, you'll see that the Democratic committees have gone from an advantage of roughly 3:2 (or a 50 percent advantage) to closer to a 2:1 advantage (well, a little better than a 15:8 or 88 percent advantage). When debts and obligations are taken into account, the advantage is even closer to 2:1 (or more than a 96 percent advantage). This comes both as a result of superior fundraising by the Democrats (even in the face of the Republicans' presidential fundraiser, which was supposed to have given the party committees an upper hand, or at least parity) and excessive spending by the Republicans.

To this point, I had been a bit concerned that despite the fact that the DSCC and the DCCC have been crushing their Republican counterparts, both in fundraising and in cash-on-hand, the DNC has been unable to match the RNC. But thinking more about it, I don't think it particularly matters at this point because by the time the presidential election really heats up the DNC will undoubtedly be able to catch up to the RNC as those maxed out to their presidential candidate send their dollars to the DNC (as might those who have given $5 to their favorite candidate).

All in all, these numbers bode extremely well for Democratic hopes of extending their majorities in Congress.



Display:


Dayem! (none / 0)

We are raking in some serious cash. What's up with Howard though?

Hmmm.


"I don't oppose all wars...what I do oppose, is a dumb war" ~ Barack Obama
by BlueDiamond on Sat Jul 21, 2007 at 11:29:58 PM EST

Re: Dayem! (none / 0)

Seems like the congressional committee is the most agressive.

I haven't really been hit up by DNC for awhile. (I just got my first letter from them in awhile a week or two ago, and I never hear from them on line.)

The Senate committee also seems a bit lax in on line fundraising drives, though I got a call from them last week. (My senator's up for reelection and he's been fundraising like crazy, so I'm mostly giving directly to him.)

I hope the DNC isn't lagging.

I mean, the whole 50-state strategy is supposed to be in a continual rebuilding mode, isn't it?


by Bush Bites on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 01:54:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

let's not get too cocky (3.00 / 0)

We are by no means assured of extending our Congressional majorities. If Hillary is our nominee, I see us losing our SD and LA Senate seats. We do have some great pickup opportunities on the Senate side, but several of those could evaporate with Hillary at the top of the ticket.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 12:43:00 AM EST

interesting (none / 0)

I hadn't thought of the max donation angle.


John McCain is a Bush ally on Social Security.
by John DE on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 12:44:55 AM EST

Re: interesting (none / 0)

I wish they could get all the nominees to send out an e-mail to their donors saying like "it's great that you're supporting me, but you should also think about supporting DNC and the Senate and Congressional committees."

I know, not likely, but I wish.....

I hope the bloggers do another "share the wealth" drive for fall 2008. I'm sure a lot of these candidates will be sitting on some money big when they're done.


by Bush Bites on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 02:03:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And our $$ goes alot further. (3.00 / 0)

We have a large number of grassroots volunteers to draw on while the republicans use paid operatives.


No Way, No How, No McCain!
by GFORD on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 02:10:48 AM EST

Re: GOP spending (none / 0)

I'm concerned about the heavy Repub spending. What are they doing every month with their millions? What do they know and we don't? Why don't we seem to care what they are doing?

My hunch is that they are spending heavily on microtargeting and related high tech preparations for next year's election and get out the vote efforts. So they will be ahead of us yet again when it comes to identifying individual voters by their hot-button issues and geting them to cast their ballots

Or they could be setting up big caging operations that we will find out about after the election when we wonder how the heck were they able to win all the close races again.


by Woody on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 11:21:49 AM EST

Re: GOP spending (none / 0)

Is there no record of their expenditures?  


Blogging for Alabama at LeftInAlabama
by Mooncat on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 02:42:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: GOP spending (none / 0)

They are spending on all kinds of early attack ads.  The little smear campaign that the NRCC went on against out freshman through radio and TV ads in May and June cost several millions of dollars.


by Toddwell on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 03:17:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: GOP spending (none / 0)

They are spending on all kinds of early attack ads.  The little smear campaign that the NRCC went on against out freshman through radio and TV ads in May and June cost several millions of dollars.


by Toddwell on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 03:18:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.