Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong

    After having read all the reasons why the recent decision of the Supreme Court concerning school desegregation was wrong, I have come to the conclusion that we have all missed the boat. The purpose of integration was not to make black kids smarter by sitting them next to white kids. If you judge the process based on that criteria, it has been a failure. If you talk to the people who were on the front lines of bringing this issue to the forefront or read their stories, it was never for that reason.

    The purpose of integrating the two separate systems was two-fold. First of all, it would bring badly needed funding to the black schools which were in such bad shape; it was a wonder anyone could learn how to tie their shoe, let alone reading, writing, and arithmetic. And the second was to give each child a chance to actually see and meet someone from a different place, diversity. An opportunity to talk, play and argue with someone who was not like themselves. It put a face and a life to "those people" that we didn't talk about or for that matter even see. It made the invisible, visible. It allowed kids that were willing to see, that we were not so different after all, that a lot of those stories and stereotypes were just not true. If gauged in that light it was a great success.

    Some will wonder how I can say it was a great success, I mean after all most of the white kids that went through it were those few whose parents believed in it or those too poor to go elsewhere. Why I say it was a success is in how the majority of young people today interact with each other. Think about what it was like before the Brown decision, how young people interacted across racial lines. Kids prior to this Brown would be amazed at how young people today can interact with relative ease. That didn't come from television or church; it came from sitting next to each other day in and day out feeling the same way about school and being a kid. For that reason alone it should be mandatory that everyone attend a desegregated school.

    I have always maintained and truly believed that the reason everyone should be allowed to attend college is not because of the great education that college provides in the classroom, but the great education it provides outside the classroom. The education one receives interacting with the many diverse races and nationalities in the dorms, in the dining halls, and at the parties is far more valuable. For those who are brave enough college can provide an opportunity get to learn about so many different cultures and people. It always troubled me to see kids come to college and be willing to interact with all this diversity only to go back home and pretend it never happened. To get back to their old friends and go back to their old ways, but I believe that internally they will forever be changed. They will know things that their friends will never know. Walls of prejudice will no longer be there even if they try to pretend they are.

    I remember when I first went to college. I came from an all-black high school experience. Growing up I had known whites, but after we moved into the neighborhood most of them left. I learned more about how to be successful from the experience of being around all those different people than anything I learned in class. The truth is that success in life is about relationships, how we interact with each other. Those who choose not to participate in this experience will miss out on more than an opportunity for career advancement; they miss out on an opportunity at life advancement; to grow as a human being. We spend so much of our time trying to separate from each other. We build walls to separate ourselves both physically and emotionally, afraid to lower our guards. We take the easy way out believing the stereotypes and the worst about one another.

    The Supreme Court was wrong because they were looking at the wrong measuring stick. In America we must constantly reinforce our unity, if we are to survive. It is too easy to forget that we are all Americans stuck in this insanity together. We need to have our walls broken down or we will just be a bunch of tribes struggling against each other when it would be so much easier if we pulled together. This Court chose fear and isolation over inclusion and diversity. In this place we call America, it is the government's job to bring us together, even if that sometimes means against our will. Our ultimate survival depends on it. Will we someday have a colorblind society? I doubt it, but we can have a color tolerant society and that begins with coming together and learning together as little children.

The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive and unrealistic - John F. Kennedy

The Disputed Truth



Display:


Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

Forgiven, I agree with some of your comments, but not all. When you say desegregation gives kids "an opportunity to talk, play and argue with someone who is not like themselves" and learn that some "stereotypes just [arent] true" I think you are misrepresenting the effectiveness of melting pot schools.

I grew up in MIAMI, FL: My middle and high-schools had a diverse mix of races, languages, income levels and family backgrounds. I have, as you imply, benefited greatly from the exposure to different skin colors, countries of origin, etc. But it was just that.. exposure.

Government-mandated deseg did little else besides put 'others' on my radar. We certainly did not intermingle socially in any significant way, or "sit next to each other day in and day out" (we were still segregated by learning talent(honors classes) and still took separate buses home..).

The power of this policy lies in its ability to counteract the visual impression created by mainstream media that minorities are minorities. It is a comendable step just to acknowledge America's true diversity. If you search your soul, however, Im sure you will agree that mandated racial deseg does not translate directly into a multi-colored "We Are the World" sing-along.

There are more progressive policies we could be supporting which show promise at inducing tolerance-building across race, language and creed in young children. Take bilingual education, for one. Im eager to continue this debate in the comments field.


by ReachOut on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 11:47:59 AM EST

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

I am not suggesting that this is the only remedy, but as you said yourself it helps to tear down some of the artificial barriers put up by the media and other stereotypical outlets.

All, I'm suggesting is that given time, I believe that there would be more interaction as the process moves forward. This thing was not created overnight and it is going to take awhile to solve it. I believe though that we have to use multiple means to attack the problem, with school diversity just being one.


by Forgiven on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 12:01:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

As I said, I agree fundamentally that deseg is a helpful step. But I wonder if it isn't a little naive of you to assume that--left to their own devices-- school children would tend towards more interaction.

Your diary rings true for "those who are brave enough," but what about those who aren't intrinsically curious, who don't actively pursue inter-racial/intercultural exchange, who don't have tolerant role models to emmulate? Deseg is too passive a policy to address these foundations of prejudice.

Education policy reform (and tolerance-building) is a make-or-break, all-encompassing issue. Im for making concrete, progressive suggestions, studying pilot programs for succesful models, and being part of the long awaited solution. I would've liked to have seen you offer more than a rant and rave, and more than a diffuse suggestion that we "use multiple means to attack the problem."

What should we advocate?


by ReachOut on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 12:44:46 PM EST

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

Education policy reform (and tolerance-building) is a make-or-break, all-encompassing issue.

I don't necessarily agree with this, this is the same attitude that judges anything not 100% a failure. There has to be passive measures to avoid the backlash that will surely come whenever people are forced to interact against there wills. No, this has to come from the "curious and the brave", but that will come with an environment that reinforces those attributes.


by Forgiven on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 01:22:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

I personally believe in vouchers(which would require a topic of its own). I think neighborhood public school system actually benefits a lot of segregationists even more than private schools under a voucher system that would mandate voucher schools should have a certain amount of diversity like colleges try to have.

The problem seems to be this. Every underclass has its share of hopeless cases for the current generation. But they also have a share of people who will succeed regardless of circumstances. I am not that concerned with these two sets for the moment. I am concerned with the middle which consists of families who don't have the will or luck to overcome their dire circumstances, but would go along with improving their lot in life if given a decent opportunity. I do not see how the public school system helps this big set of kids as they are trapped in a system that is unwilling to help them. We heard about public school reform for decades. WHAT HAS HAPPENED? You still see a lot of college athletes who are woefully unprepared for anything but athletics. The kind of schooling some of them went through is quite bluntly worse than some third world country schooling.  

I had a debate over public schools with a couple of guys. I said the concept of a neighborhood public school was unfair to the underclass and that families should be given the option to opt out. Some conditions could be negotiated to make opting out not easy to do. And neighborhood kids can get higher priority for the majority of admissions in a public school. Some variations on this have already been tried out in public school, if I remember correctly. Instead of forced busing, it would be semi voluntary where the parents would initiate application to an out of neighborhood school.

Anyway these proponents of neighborhood public schools do not have liberal ideas in mind. When they defend the idea, they say "why should we subsidize with our high property taxes someone else's kids". And in some cases, you will hear racist variations like "why should our kids have to mix with undesirable kids when we spent so much time looking for his house". I find this to be a more common defense of neighborhood public schools. They say "the other families should just work to improve their schools" as if a few families can singlehandedly revamp dysfunctional school districts on their own without sacrificng their jobs and family life. And why should I, an unmarried guy, subsidize rich families with kids in  my school district??? THey have no answer for that. Why should our lives be ruled by the limitation of the neighborhood where you choose to live?

I also would not base any failures of past integrations on the concept itself. The reason is the kids were being integrated too late and their parents were not integrated either. Kids these days are mixing a lot more. ANd it will only get better as the years go by. Of course, it will never be ideal as mankind always has this tendency to group themselves, be mean, be kind, etc.

And there is something to be said of associating outside your group. I have been complacent because I hung out with underachievers throughout my 20s. Then I started talking business with one of my friends(Carribean) and we realized we both had contacts we did not tap before for networking reasons. But even now, we do not do it in a business manner. We just made an effort to be more interactive in those circles.  Guess what. Our world opened up and we see rich potential in a few business areas. He or I wouldn't have gotten that by being stuck in our lil social circles.  


by Pravin on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 02:12:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

The problem again is in the funding, so long as we use personal property taxes alone the poor will stay poor. We need to have other forms of funding that will ensure the quality of education for all of our children. With that being said I still believe that we as a diverse society must strive to unify our population, I think that schools are a good place to start before too many of the stereotypes and lies have resonated with the children...


by Forgiven on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 03:04:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

The property taxes is something I was going to address too in terms of the limitations of neighborhood public schools. Good point. I would rather see more regional funding if students are stuck in their neighborhoods.


by Pravin on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 03:16:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

I feel like my comments were not taken as they were intended; I am not against desegregation. I just draw from personal experience to argue it isn't enough. In essence, my argument was in-line with yours, Forgiven. There should be passive measures and active measures. Originally my qualm was that your post didnt mention any complementary active measures.

In addition to vouchers to get kids from challenged enighborhoods to better-performing schools, I would again highlight curricular reform as I did in a side note at the end of my first post. In Miami and LA, pilot programs are in place that put native English speakers together with English as a Second Language Speakers to learn content, alternating between teaching history, math and other subjects to the same crowd in English one day and Spanish the next. This is an active complement to passive desegregation, as it generates more in-classroom intercultural contact. It may also promote tolerance of difference "before too many of the stereotypes and lies have resonated with the children" as you put it.

Just wanted to give you another weapon in your arsenal to campaign for tolerance and equality in schools.


by ReachOut on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 03:28:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

Thank you reachout,

I think it is vitally important to draw on as many weapons as possible to combat our natural inclination to segregate, our media reinforced stereotypes, and of course just good ole prejudice. And while it isn't the end all, desegregation considering the context of its implementation was a good start. I'm just saying that we need to view the reason for it's first implementation in its historical context. I still believe it is of vital importance to continue to try to desegregate our schools by any means necessary...


by Forgiven on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 03:51:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

Lest the voucher issue distract readers from my main points, I wanted to add that my reply was in essence an agreement with Forgiven's comment, and not the other guy's. We can discuss vouchers in a separate diary. Or you can read my older one on public schools.

Also, readers should not get hung up on the details of any proposals I laid out in the longer commment. THose were just off the head examples. There could be a myriad of solutions available for a community to pick and choose from.


by Pravin on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 02:16:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

why did you immediately assume i was a guy?


by ReachOut on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 02:39:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong (none / 0)

OK, the other person. I should have mentioned you by name, but I was too lazy to go back a page and look it up.


by Pravin on Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 03:16:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.