Shuler's Numbers Don't Tell the Whole Story

CQ Politics posted an interesting analysis of Democratic Party Unity since regaining the majority.  Here's the bit on Congressman Shuler:

Heath Shuler, North Carolina's 11th District (West -- Asheville)

* Party Unity Score: 82.9 percent (4th lowest)

* 2006 result: Shuler 54%, Rep. Charles H. Taylor 46%

* 2004 President: Bush 57%, Kerry 43%

Shuler, who takes conservative positions on some social issues, voted against the bills to promote embryonic stem cell research and to classify certain violent offenses as "hate crimes." He also voted against a defeated bill, backed by 169 Democrats and two Republicans, that called for the full withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq within 180 days.

When Congressman Shuler took office, I was prepared for him to vote against Democrats and progressives on issues of gay rights, stem cell science, and a range of other "social issues".  What I wasn't prepared for was the poor reasoning and outright intolerance in casting those votes.

Follow me after the jump for analysis of this Mixed Bag Democrat.

On stem cells, Shuler uses Republican talking points about protecting the life of the blastocysts.  In my comment at Shuler's blog I noted,

"Your argument doesn't make sense. The above commenters have already pointed out the obvious, that denying people with progressive diseases like Parkinson's all the medical research available is not exactly pro-life, that not utilizing available stem cells is wasteful, that unless you plan on seeking a total shutdown of fertility clinics those discarded blastocysts will rot in the bottom of the petri dish instead of being used for the good of humanity. There is no destruction of human life implicit in stem cell research. There just isn't."

In opposing the hate crimes bill, Shuler chose to alienate and vilify every homosexual in his district:

Shuler said he was guided equally by political philosophy and by his Baptist religion, which teaches that homosexuality is wrong.

It's also important to note that Shuler "previously voted for legislation -- subsequently vetoed by Bush -- that made a reduction of U.S. troops in Iraq a condition to continue funding."  Shuler then went on to capitulate and vote with the Democratic majority  on giving Bush a blank check to continue the war.

On the flip side, Congressman Shuler voted:

- to increase the minimum wage

  • to give workers more power to unionize
  • to strengthen ethics rules
  • to lower interest rates on student loans
  • to expand the Carl Sandburg Memorial site
  • to offset budget increases with revenue and/or cuts (paygo)
  • to allow D.C. voting rights
  • to restrict oil companies' price gouging
  • to allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices
  • to implement the 9/11 Commission's recommendations
  • to protect corporate "whistleblowers"
  • to offer small businesses help with environmental assessments

So what do we make of this Mixed Bag Democrat?  It appears that, aside from the offending votes above, Shuler's record is miles better than any Republican who might hold this seat.  However, his flip-flopping on Iraq, his intolerance for gays, his disdain of reason regarding stem cell research, and his hardline immigration stance are the poison pills in an otherwise decent tenure.

I'd like to think that Shuler is simply afraid, that he is kowtowing to the fundamentalist right on stem cells and gay rights for fear of being labeled a baby-killer or a homo-lover while bending to the intolerant immigration hardliners in his NO AMNESTY!!! stance for fear of being called a coddler.  Republican ads are already trying to draw a direct line between Shuler and their bogeyman of the moment, Nancy Pelosi, who is being painted as a radical.  Shuler's likely afraid of this attack as well.  The biggest fear he holds, along with so many other capitulating Democrats, is to be called a troop-hater by the gang that sent them to die for a pack of lies.

None of this fear-based voting is attractive or particularly honorable.  It's a good thing that Shuler sees the broad support for the legislation he's already supported and that he willfully took on the business world with his pro-worker vote or else we'd be left with the same kind of hollow representation we'd become accustomed to.

I imagine that Shuler is following his playbook - appeasing the intolerant homo-bigots, anti-science blastocyst freedom fighters, immigration hardliners, and pro-war drill sergeants while working on many of the populist and progressive issues that earned him my vote.  It's ugly, these politics, and here's hoping Shuler rises to find the courage of his convictions rather than sinking into fear-based representation.

c/p at Scrutiny Hooligans and BlueNC



Display:


Give Shuler a break (none / 0)

He is the kind of Democrat that we should be glad to have in our party.  He is the kind of Democrat that could win us back some more Southern seats.


by Toddwell on Fri Jun 08, 2007 at 09:04:58 PM EST

Re: Give Shuler a break (none / 0)

But, he should start behaving like a democrat...

Listen, the righties are going to smear him no matter what he does...  he might as well behave like a democrat, instead of pretending to be a republican.

He's ok... I wish he had a little more courage... especially on Iraq.  He got elected on the Iraq issue...  some guts in that department would do better for him than pandering to the right.

Thanks,

Mike


by lordmikethegreat on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 12:56:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

But, but, but.... (none / 0)

I mean, c'mon, would you rather go back to the days of Chuck Taylor?

I say, stay on Shuler and hold him accountable, but keep in mind that no matter what you are telling yourself, the alternatives aren't any better.


by mihan on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 01:41:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But, but, but.... (none / 0)

Chuck Taylor was a blight on the land.  He was corrupt and incompetent.

Shuler is new.  We are going to hold him accountable, and we'll applaud his positive votes.  It's our responsibility to help Shuler move to sane positions on Iraq and other issues.


by Screwy Hoolie on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 01:55:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But, but, but.... (none / 0)

There is nothing wrong with holding someone accountable, by way of letting them know that you are displeased with the stances that they are taking.

What worries me though is that we(this community) don't always remember that there are differences in individuals, in the way they see the world. The Democratic Party is the party that allows for certain ideological differences because collectively we can band together to protect the value the things we believe in. Things that the other party actively tries to destroy.

While Shuler is far from being a liberal icon, his presence in Congress allows Nancy Pelosi to be in the Speaker role, and for now that's going to have to do. I say, beyond that, we'll take what we can get from him and hope/ask for more.


by mihan on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 02:07:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Shuler's Numbers Don't Tell the Whole Story (1.00 / 0)

Well, my religion tells me that aging, ugly, sucky ex-shitty quarterbacks are immoral.  Thus, this fucker ain't getting a dime from me.

It's one thing to vote a certain way, but quite another to use GOP frames and INSULT gays while he's at it.  


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 01:37:12 AM EST

Im from Western North Carolina (none / 0)

Heath has no personal problem with homosexuals, but he comes from a very socially conservative district. He's been great on the environment, and on conservation, which also fits his district.

Check out this op-ed about Shuler's already impressive record on environmental and energy legislation (including opposition to coal-to-liquids!)

Heath also has a great staff on Capitol Hill and in the district, and they have been incredible to work with, very responsive, and are good folks.

I like him.
I gave to him.
Ill keep giving to him as long as he runs for that seat.

peace,
JW


by faithfull on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 07:39:34 AM EST

Re: Im from Western North Carolina (none / 0)

Heath said that homosexuality is wrong.

That's not a personal problem?  Funny, all the gay people I spend time with sure think it's a personal problem.

Heath has lots of strengths.  I did a fairly good job of listing them here (though I did leave out the link you offer, faithfull).  He's also got some serious liablities when it comes to encouraging progressive Buncombe County to get to the polls.

The enviro/small business thrust has been excellent, and I imagine we'll see more of it since Shuler is on the Small Business subcommittee and the Infrastructure Committee.  

Faithfull, your support of Heath is clear.  What do you think of his hate crimes, stem cell, Iraq War, and immigration positions?


by Screwy Hoolie on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 08:52:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Im from Western North Carolina (none / 0)

Faithfull, your support of Heath is clear.  What do you think of his hate crimes, stem cell, Iraq War, and immigration positions?

For perspective/background purposes, what were Charles Taylor's positions on these issues? For whom did Taylor and Shuler vote for Speaker and Majority Leader?

Just curious.


by mihan on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 01:49:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Im from Western North Carolina (none / 0)

I think you should read what faithfull wrote more clearly.

faithfull said that Congressman Shuler has no personal problems with homosexuals...

You noted his belief that homosexuality is wrong.

Those are two distinct notions.  Even though I'm agnostic...I'm quite aware of the whole "hate the sin and love the sinner" thing....

I think you are being unfair to the Congressman in this instance...but it seems like you've got an axe to grind...so have at it.

If not...then I apologize and merely suggest that you work on your reading comprehension.

Similarly....when you speak for "all the gay people I spend time with"...it seems as if THEY are the ones with the personal problem...not the Congressman.

While I sympathize with the struggles of the LGBT community....I believe that most of their issues have become wedge issues that I think are generally irrelevant to the great problems that this nation faces.

I think that Congressman Shuler's failure to stand for principle with regard to the funding of troops in Iraq is a more serious problem.  I eagerly await his response to a letter I wrote to him.  Unfortunately, it seems that he may not answer me.

But I digress....


by jackstraw1969 on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 09:33:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Im from Western North Carolina (none / 0)

O.K.

So your assertion is this - Though Shuler believes homosexuality is wrong, which infers that it is a choice, he has no problem with the wrongdoers who have chosen to be homosexual.

Is that right?

Because it's a really very weird way to think about the whole issue.  If someone comes up to me and says "White, heterosexual males are wrong", should I take that to mean that they think my whiteness, heterosexuality, and maleness are wrong but that aside from those vices I'm A-O.K.?

I don't get it.

The axe being ground here is that of social justice and equality.  Call it an axe if you like.  I call it a value.


by Screwy Hoolie on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 05:22:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.