Kick Jefferson out of the House

Rep. William Jefferson now has his indictment on federal corruption charges in hand. He should leave on his own accord, right?  And if not, kick him out to the curb.

Democrats really screwed up by not dealing with Jefferson during the last cycle, because the perception that is created now, is potentially one of hypocrisy. In 2006, they ran against the Culture of Corruption that was among the Republican ranks, and Jefferson too was among the corrupt. The Democrats won power, and now one of their own on on federal charges of racketeering, soliciting bribes and money laundering.

Why in the world would Democrats linger and not act quickly on this matter? Why would Pelosi and the CBC let House Minority Leader John Boehner seemingly take the lead on getting rid of corrupt officials?

Are the Democrats in the House (and specifically the CBC) going to squander the anti-branding effort achieved against the Republicans in 2006? They don't really like being in the Majority?



Display:


Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

They have had far more scandals than democrats


by redstatehatemonitor on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:13:33 PM EST

doesn't matter (none / 0)

The evidence against Jefferson is strong. Kick him to the curb. What is the rationale for not doing so? There isn't any.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:20:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You want a rationale? (none / 0)

Here are two, one theoretical and one practical.

One we have a Constitution. One that establishes principles called 'Due Process' and 'Presumption of Innocence'. Granted the Bush Administration has decided none of that is important, but frankly I don't draw my direction from there. Jefferson's constituents were okay letting the process play out, it is kind of arrogant for anyone else to privilege their own judgement. It's that democracy thing.

Two the FBI was clearly on the ball. Jefferson was caught red-handed, or considering where the cash was, blue-handed with $90,000 is marked bills supplied by the FBI for a bribe. The rest was just a matter of time. Any kind of Ethics investigation would have put that ultimate prosecution at risk. Remember that is why Ollie North ended up walking, his testimony to Congress compromised his jury trial. Do you really want Jefferson walking on an appeal?

We don't need to be drawing lessons about being Judge, Jury and Executioner from this White House. Properly speaking once we knew the case was in the hands of the FBI and the Justice Dept, which is to say from Day One, the heat if any should have been directed over there and not to Leadership.

Purges? or Due Process?

I know the Constitution is kind of old-fashioned, and slow sometime, which doesn't mean we need to put it on an ice floe and send it out to sea to die out of sight.


by Bruce Webb on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 12:37:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wronghead Rationale (none / 0)

#1 This is not a criminal case in the Congress. There need be no presumption of innocense, it's a political body and it must take into account political considerations.

#2 Congress makes its own rules. Sometimes these rules are un-democratic, sometimes they are arguably unconstitutional, but because the Constitution says that Congress can make its own rules they are allowed.

Claiming this is some sort of Constitutional issue betrays a failure in understanding how the rules of the Congress are made, enforced, and work.


by MNPundit on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:44:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The problem is New Orleans/LA (1.00 / 9)

It is the most corrupt State and City.
They supported Edwin Edwards
They re-elected Ray Nagin
Re-electing Jefferson is no surprised.
The Congressional Black Criminals were standing by Jefferson. They could have endorsed Karen Carter.
by nkpolitics on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:20:24 PM EST

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

Go Karen!


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:40:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 1)

That may be true, and the CBC should certainly answer for standing by Jefferson, but calling them the Congressional Black Criminals gets us nowhere.  It [understandably] creates the impression that the CBC is fundamentally corrupt and that its members should all be viewed with a wary eye (you know, like we view Republicans).  

Besides, it just sounds racist.  Not saying you are (you might be African-American for all I know), but that kind of comment just doesn't look right on a Democratic blog page.


by Oly on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:08:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

I wish we could edit: the "understandably" shouldn't be there.  It went along with a different sentence I deleted before posting, but it doesn't go in this sentence.  


by Oly on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:11:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 4)

 "Congressional Black Criminals"??? Where am I, Michelle Malkin's site?

 Jefferson isn't a crook because he's black. Jefferson is a crook because he's a crook.

 


by Master Jack on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:17:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 1)

Hey, NKpolitics, do me a solid, and, on behalf of the people of New Orleans, go bleep yourself.  


by DrAsh on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:39:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 2)

An outrageous slander against the Congressional Black Caucus, to call those fine men and women - at least two of them to my knowledge distinguished veterans of live-fire wars - "Criminals."

I don't at all agree with their backing of Jefferson to date, though he had not even been indicted before today.  Frankly, their willingness to back someone like Jefferson comes from the fact that there are a lot of asswipes who will call Black people criminals categorically without evidence.  For example, yourself.

I dare you to call a veteran and patriot like John Conyers a criminal to his face.  Do it to civil rights hero John Lewis, to veteran Charles Rangel.


by Crablaw on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 11:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

I have great respect for John Conyers,Charlie Rangel and John Lewis. They are my favorite members of Congress. But to play devils advocate. How come they are not publicly of privately telling Jefferson that he must resign from Congress. What about Al Wynn. You can call me a racist but I am a realist about the CBC.


by nkpolitics on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 08:19:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

I don't call you a racist; I call you a slanderer.  

I don't like Wynn and consider him corrupt due to his cozy relations with corporate donors, but corrupt does equal criminal.  If you respect
Conyers, don't call him a Criminal, unless you have an indictment or (more properly) either a guilty verdict or pretty powerful evidence of Conyers committing a -- -- -- crime.

The fact that black people get piled on as criminals when they are not is reason number one for the CBC to take no action against Jefferson.


by Crablaw on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 10:52:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 2)

We ARE NOT THE PROBLEM!

The prob lies within the Party itself: lobbyists, professional "polyticians" and an ignorant populace. (oh! and you Race fetishists.)

There is no "quality" amongst the people that vote. They are clueless as to the wheres and whys of things. They do not think critically. They can't really understand anything outside of their yuppie toys and whether Jill needs to be driven to ballet practice or if Trent has to go to ball practice. (Oh yes... what is the wine for the meeting this week?)

The 200,000, those of us who returned to rebuild this city, do not care for armchair political crap about "who we reelected." We didn't vote for Jefferson. Those who did were bussed in by the Jackson crowd. (By one of those you have a fetish for.)

Anyone who is not from New Orleans needs to have a major Reality check. You aren't here, and you have no freakin' idea of the Truth about this place. Too many of you live an artificial life that bears no resemblance to the world the Founders foresaw.

I'm a Jeffersonian Democrat. I have always been registered that way, even when I was lumped into the Peace and Freedom Party. I AM a Progressive. I have studied the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. I have read all of the works of the Founders in my time.

How many of you "blame New Orleanians" Democrats out there can state the same? Do you even understand the fact that this city and it's cultures are closer to T.J.'s ideals then the poop you are living?

When was the last time you walked your neighborhood and talked with the folks on the porches? Have you made a huge bunch of food and handed it out to those around you? In what fashion have you interfaced with those around you?

And in what ways have you helped your fellow citizens? Have you given service to the country?

The answers to those questions are most probably "Nadda, zilch, and huh?".

If you see yourself on the negative in these questions, then you know what you are in the American system... THE ENEMY.

We here in New Orleans are fighting for our lives and culture. (Do you even have a culture in your homeplace?)

Ben Franklin told us we had A Republic "If we can keep it.". How have you defended the Republic lately?

When you have to go through what we've existed under for the last 21 months, then you will have some validity. Experience the trashing of your folks by a Nation only intent upon SUVs and their porfolios... only concerned about their lonely selves and not the web of community we live in...

Welcome to Demo-Publican America.

We, the 200,000 in New Orleans who are rebuilding and getting things going, don't need your selfish, Demo-Publican crap. We will rebuild, but you folks can only replace the garbage you have lost. We can create, but you can only copy failed things since you are intellectually challenged.

In other words, we are keeping something vital alive. We ARE THE AMERICAN DREAM. We LIVE... What's your modern American life like?

Here in New Orleans, we do live Jefferson's dream.
Our lives are about community and continuity. We live our lives and try not to destroy others'.

Can you understand what I'm trying to express? Are you that so far out from the real Human experience that you have no reality when it comes to community?

So children, attack the folks of New Orleans, and understand that I will be there protecting our Sacred place. Most of you aren't worth the dirt to cover your carcasses.

I'm Morwen Madrigal, and New Orleans and Her people are mine to protect. Trash us, and get ready to reap the whirlwind.

http://gentillygirl.com/


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 04:56:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (3.00 / 1)

"Can you understand what I'm trying to express?"

Yes, indeed, GentillyGirl.  Peace be with you and may your righteous anger yield many blessings for you and yours.  Long live the beauty of New Orleans.


by jukesgrrl on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:37:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (1.00 / 1)

So when is your next Mardi Gras Ceremony. Me and my friends want to place burning lower case T signs in front of your lawn as Time to leave and dress up like ghosts.
And by the way

FREE DUKE
FREE DUKE
FREE DUKE
FREE DUKE


by nkpolitics on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 08:26:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

Are you a NAPPY HEADED HARD CORE HO.


by nkpolitics on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 08:28:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The problem is New Orleans/LA (none / 0)

Jeezus, NK, blog drunk much?


by ray in new orleans on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 09:05:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Easier said than done (none / 0)

I'm pretty sure I did a piece way back (can't find it) which looked at the House Rules, and came to the conclusion that there's nothing that could require Jefferson to do anything different as a result of being indicted.

The Dem Caucus rules aren't public. Perhaps there's something in there that would let him be kicked out of the Caucus.

Even if there were a clear rule to that effect, the problem for Pelosi is political: has she got the support needed to get him removed, and to endure the consequences of doing so?

Or wouldn't she prefer to play for time, much like they're doing for Iraq?


by skeptic06 on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:21:54 PM EST

CBC was clueless since this started!! (3.00 / 1)

And they had the nerve to have a hissy-fit because Pelosi replaced Jefferson on the Way & Means Committee and rightfully so.  Now, it is time for Jefferson to resign for the good of the party.  If he does not, which he probably WILL NOT, then kick his ass out.  Let the doorknob hit you where the dog should have bit you!!


"I want my voice to be read"
by icebergslim on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:30:02 PM EST

Why does it take (none / 0)

scandal and corruption to get even the progressive community to pay attention to post-Katrina New Orleans?


Ever heard of a Blue Moose Democrat?
by Nathan Empsall on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:40:59 PM EST

Re: Why does it take (3.00 / 2)

I am the one who cares about New Orleans, and the same goes for the NOLA Bloggers.

We are working hard to uncover the bullshiite, but outsiders don't care.

They are only caring if we play the Race card.

I personally hate Democrats, as I do Repugs...

All that I support is the elimination of all of the Demo-Publican Party. Once those mothers are gone, we have a real chance at having a civil society. (Well, there are the cross-wearers... don't worry, I'll nail those poops to trees.)

All I'm about is the Republic of the Founders. (You shareholders and crap just lay down and croak.)

Most of you ain't worth the dirt it will take to cover your traitorist souls.)

(Yep! I'm referring to white people's thought
processes.)

Yes, I'm the whitest black girl you'll ever meet, and I will call you on your shit.

Morwen Madrigal
http://gentillygirl.com/


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 06:18:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does it take (none / 0)

Sad but true.

I am sad you hate the Dems.  I am a Democrat.  But I can't argue with the fact that the Dems have been virtually no better than the Repubs when it comes to post-Katrina recovery.

I am sick about that.  It is just the truth.  And even now, I have seen no Democrat (with the exception of some of the '08 presidential candidates - and so not yet proven) who has really put forth the reality that fixing the Gulf Coast is a national issue and ought to be a national priority.

In this case, both parties have utterly failed the region.  You speak the truth, and I wish folks would take a moment to get past politics and realize that.


by Nightprowlkitty on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 11:46:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does it take (3.00 / 1)

It's time for a Progressive party darlin'.

Wanna help putting one together?


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 04:19:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The leaders of the Progressive Party ... (3.00 / 1)

... are coming from New Orleans, and I've been watchin' you all.  I just don't think folks in blogland realize what you have accomplished and the new vision you have wrested forth from blood, sweat and tears.

They ought to pay more attention.

Me, I'm allowing myself with great pleasure to  be edumacated by folks like you.  Thank you for all you do.


by Nightprowlkitty on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 08:29:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The leaders of the Progressive Party ... (3.00 / 1)

Kitty,

Your thoughts on this are exactly mine.... New Orleans and the Federal Flood will be more of a catalyst for change than the unlawful Iraq war.


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Wed Jun 06, 2007 at 02:30:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does it take (3.00 / 2)

I don't really hate Demos... I just feel that the Party has lost it's way. My parents were Demos and they fought for Civil Rights. They fought for people... I can't see that in the Party anymore.

I was a part of the AIDS Crisis, and I didn't see many donkeys running to help the kids.

You see, I DO remember.

I'm a Veteran, a bitch, and a historian. I pay attention.

I dispise Modern Culture and it's B/S. I live in a city the values itself, where being a person matters.

I happen to believe that the person matters.

I do remember what the Democratic Party stood for decades ago... sadly, I understand that it morphed into something evil.

To my way of seeing things, we need a Party of intellectuals who have a grounding with people, and the only thing I see for this is for the Progressives, not the Demos, taking control.

We live life, are grounded, and we ain't associated with business. We will be the People's Party.

Plesae understand, I'm a Veteran that gave a decade of her life in service to the country. I spent 20 years burying the boys that the country wouldn't try to help. I stand now in a city that the PTB tries to forget.

I'm a Progressive, and I want a Party that actually cares for people instaed of their portfolios.

I am a Patriot, and I am a renegade... my desire is to have my region to succeed from the Union in order to prove what we give to the Nation.

Isn't that what a Jeffersonian would do?


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 05:17:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does it take (3.00 / 1)

Relax, Nathan, they'll be gone in a day or so.  Just like they fucked off for good after the November election.  They'll be back on August 29 for another hurricane retrospective, they'll wail and moan about "how can this be America?", they'll take a few pictures to be used for anti-GOP talking points, and then they'll go back to their armchair Iowa polling data analysis, which is of course where their rubber meets their road.

You and me, we're on our own.

Gutting party at Lisa Pal's house real soon.  Two stories of damaged plaster needs to go so that her contractor can start work.  You up for it?  Let the MSLB play with their numbers, we got work to do.


by ray in new orleans on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 11:21:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hey hey ho ho (1.00 / 1)

...yada yada yada Jefferson has gotta go!


by optimusprime on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:43:33 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (3.00 / 1)

While all abuses of power and embezzling of public funds ought to be scrutinized, there are many other more pressing issues that should not be forgotten in the midst of this investigation.  We must remember that, to date, the war has cost over $340 billion dollars--money which could have been spent much more wisely and with better end results.  It is estimated, for example, that the expenditure of a mere $19 billion would eliminate starvation and malnutrition worldwide.  In a time when the current defense budget is $522 billion, the goal of eradicating world hunger is clearly well within reach.  Thus, it is clear that the occupation of Iraq needs to end as it is doomed to failure, and it needs to end now without regard to what this will do to United States interest in Iraq's oil.  There are simply much more important issues that need to be addressed for Congress to focus completely on the investigation of scandals.  


by Jessica on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:47:53 PM EST

Won't happen (none / 0)

... And we all know why


by dpANDREWS on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:52:43 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Kick brother to the curb and let's move on. We don't need corrupt people like him in Congress or in our party.


Viva la Revolucion!
by Bloggernista on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:54:44 PM EST

Pelosi should be looking .... (none / 0)

To stick her high heel in his backside.  

He has to go.


by dpANDREWS on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:00:46 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Exactly what procedure would the House leadership follow if they did wish to kick him out? Impeachment?


by mcc on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:35:59 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Expulsion. Both houses of congress can expel a member. I would guess by two-thirds or three-fifths, but I'll bet somebody here knows the Constitution better than I do.


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:39:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Two thirds shouldn't be a problem. Are there any House Republicans who want a vote to not expel Jefferson on his record next primary season? Their base would eat them alive.

So it only takes about a third of Democrats to expel him.


by antiHyde on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:53:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (3.00 / 1)

Not to be a wet blanket but:

  1. hasn't he already been stripped of his plum committee assignments?
  2. isn't even he entitled to a presumption of innocence?
  3. bear in mind that (to bring it all together) the charges are brought by one of Bush's U.S. Attorneys (you know: "loyal Bushies").

So, as long as Pelosi has him isolated and stripped of the power he might otherwise have as a majority member with seniority, what else overt would you have Pelosi do?  On the other hand, what pressure is really available to Pelosi et al to get him to resign, given that his constituents just sent him back for another 2 years?

Finally, being realistic, one of the chits that a criminal defendant office-holder has to bargain with is the resignation from office.  (Think all the way back to Spiro Agnew.) It might be the "right thing to do" for him to resign, but it would be, from the point of view of his own personal best interest, a foolish thing to resign without a plea bargain.  If (just for the sake of argument) you were his defense counsel, would you counsel him to resign without any deal?  


by nycounsel on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:40:49 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

"isn't even he entitled to a presumption of innocence? "

NO! House rules used to be that you had to go when a Grand Jury indicted you.


by antiHyde on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:55:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

This is absolutely false. The rule that you refer to is a House rule that says you must relinquish and leadership position if indicted. And I take strong issue with Jerome's claim that Jefferson should be expelled from the House.

Yes, we are entitled to a presumption of innocence in spite of whatever evidence there may be in the public record. This is the rule of law and to state that an indictment is a sign of guilt is outrageous.

Jefferson may be guilty (he probably is, of course you've seen the evidence) and he should resign. But there has never, ever been a case where an indicted member of Congress was expelled before they were found guilty. Look at Traficant. That guy was so guilty and they didn't expel him until he was found guilty. And the Republicans were in charge then!

Pelosi should demand that Jefferson resign his seat for the good of the people of New Orleans. In the meantime he should be stripped of his committee assignments and the Ethics Committee should begin a formal investigation post-haste. If the Ethics Committee rules that he should be expelled than expel him. That's how it works.

To state that he should be denied the presumption of innocence is unbelievable. I thought we were supposed to be the party the stands up for the rule of law. We stand up for habeas corpus, against torture, and for a presumption of innocence.


by ECLE on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 11:16:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Did you feel the same way about Tom DeLay?

If not, why not?


by antiHyde on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 12:10:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Tom DeLay resigned his leadership post as he was required to do. He wasn't expelled nor should he have been simply because he was indicted. Tom DeLay resigned on his own accord as should William Jefferson.


by ECLE on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:47:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Well, I must say that you are consistent in either your tolerance of corruption or your respect for legalisms. Most here, including myself, were yelling for DeLay's scalp.

Please pardon, the late reply, I've been away from a secure computer to put my password into.


by antiHyde on Sat Jun 09, 2007 at 09:01:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

This is more nuanced than everyone is pretending.

Being indicted is not the same as being convicted.  What precedent does this set, that every indicted member of congress should immediately be kicked out?

Yes, strip him of all committee assignments, and even kick him out of the Democratic caucus and CBC too.  But the people of his district elected him knowing about the cash in the freezer and so forth.

There are dangers in setting this kind of precedent, particularly with how the Bush Admin has been running DoJ.  What if they trump up some case against Pelosi or (probably more believable) Murtha?  Will we demand they resign or get kicked out immediately?  

The Prosecution's case is strong, and so much as we know of Jefferson's defence is weak, but that is why we have trials.

Numerous indicted republicans were not kicked out of the house, nor any serious move to do so until after their guilty pleas (Ney, Cunningham).


by scientician on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:43:24 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

And before someone makes the obvious point, No, I don't believe we need to look to the Republicans to set moral standards, but I do think expelling indicted house members is not a black and white issue.

We are in the midst of a scandal involving the politicization and corruption of the DoJ for partisan gain.  I do not know of any evidence that Jefferson's indictment is trumped up or politically motivated, but the next indicted Democrat might be.

It sucks that the Democrats have such a transparently corrupt member, but at least they are not falling overthemselves in the media about what a "good man" Jefferson is, the way numerous republicans did for Ney and Cunningham.

Democrats did not promise that out of 200+ members none would ever fail to meet the high standards, only to end the culture of corruption, to stop rewarding, and systemically encouraging it.

Pelosi already took Jefferson off his Appropriations seat before he was even indicted.


by scientician on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:48:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not all that nuanced (none / 0)

The guy was caught with wads of cash in his freezer.  I can see waiting for indictment to kick him out (for fear of setting a precedent - after all it is trivially easy to say someone is under investigation).  But this guy needs to go, and now.   He has been indicted for corruption and bribery!

If, in the future, the Dems want to make a special exception for someone who has been indicted (say for civil disobedience), fine, but the general rule should be they are gone upon indictment.


by Emma Anne on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:05:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not all that nuanced (none / 0)

You don't get indicted for civil disobedience do you?

Anyway, the precedent is that the US Executive Branch, through the FBI has alleged that Jefferson has been caught doing all these awful things.

A jury of his peers has yet to hear the case, and Jefferson's defence.

Kicking him out of the US House of Representatives on the basis of the Bush DoJ's word is not something we should simply accept without reflection.

Does anyone here think Rove or Gonzales is above cooking up a case against prominent democrats timed for electoral dismay?  This was most likely the whole point of sending Karl Rove's buddy Tim Griffin to Arkansas, just in time for Hillary's likely nomination.

If we want to kick Jefferson out over being indicted we must do the same to any other member of congress so indicted, or come up with some rational criteria of determining the ones we kick out from the trumped up miscarriages of justice cooked up by Rove or Rove-like Republicans in future.

Just be careful what standard we are setting in an era where the DoJ cannot be trusted.  

Personally, I think there needs to be some kind of mechanism of paid suspension, with some type of substitute temporary member voting in the absence of indicted members.  It is reasonable to revoke his committee assignments and other abusable perks, but he is still innocent until proven guilty.


by scientician on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:47:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not all that nuanced (none / 0)

This is going to be a bigger and bigger deal as the statewide off-off year election gets closer this fall.


by dantsmith on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 11:50:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

wasn't clear (none / 0)

I know we all believe he's a crook, but really we only have the word of the Government on that.  The FBI and DoJ are not trustworthy sources anymore.

The allegations are serious, but I am not aware of independent corroboration of his criminality as yet.


by scientician on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:52:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not all that nuanced (none / 0)

Sure, it looks bad, but that's why you kick him off committees and out of the caucus. Leave him isolated, but there's no point expelling him until he's found guilty.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 10:27:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not all that nuanced (none / 0)

Yeah, don't give him a single committee assignment, and thus punish the people of New Orleans.

That'll show 'em.  Idiots.


by DrAsh on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 12:17:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Culture of Corruption? (none / 0)

You don't have to look any further than Cook County Illinois to find all the corruption and political incest that you can stomach and more.

The hardest part of recruiting moderates to vote Democratic is the stink blowing out of Chicago and the soon to be renamed Stroger County.


by antiHyde on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:58:11 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (3.00 / 1)

Karen Carter was our candidate, and Jefferson's people succeeded in making her the white candidate.

He's got the same people as Ray Nagin, who ran a racist campaign for re-election.

The state of Louisiana is completely dysfunctional right now.

For more, click the links on these two recent voic.us stories.

http://www.voic.us/node/2166
http://www.voic.us/danablankenhorn/1773/ louisiana_no_road_home


by Dana Blankenhorn on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:04:50 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

I think the CBC is going to take the low key route.  They don't want to be publicly appear to be supporting someone who is corrupt, but I also don't think any one member wants to be seen as leading the charge for his resignation.  I think they expect plenty of non-CBC members of Congress to call for Jefferson's resignation, so short of a James Trafficant (SP?) situation, where Jefferson starts putting a bad face on the CBC, they'll hold their fire. He's still one their own.


by Kingstongirl on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:07:53 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

He has to go.  Corruption needs to be weeded out, and if we are serious about one of the platforms we succeeded on in 2006, we need to make this one quick and swift.  


by georgep on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:22:00 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

I agree.  This guy should be expelled immediately.


by Toddwell on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:28:43 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Expel him.  Screw New Orleans.  Those people should know better than to live there.  After all, they voted for Nagin and Jefferson.  

Hmmm...and Amerika voted for Bush.  Screw you guys too.


by DrAsh on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:38:49 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

I posted this at firedoglake as someone kindly linked up your post.

Wasn't this story out before his last election? At least the 90K cash found in freezer, meme, must have made the local news and they reelected him with a clear message that they stand by him at least until a guilty verdict. I don't like it either but I think its the voters choice which I feel compelled to stand behind, through a trial. I understand why his constituents did so, even if I disagree.

Didn't the Speaker withhold him from chairing committees or was it all committee positions?

We have to wait on this one.

But he should step down.


by eureka springs on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:39:58 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Pelosi took him off Appropriations (or was it Ways and Means?) - one of the big money commitees anyway.  After he was re-elected, she had to give him something, so he's on Homeland Security.  I don't know how much opportunity he has for corruption on that committee.

I agree, calling for his head is not right until he is convicted in a fair trial.

Boehner can fuck his hat and tell us what expulsion motions he brought to the floor to expel Ney and Cunningham.  


by scientician on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 10:50:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Actually, he's on the small business committee.

Though Pelosi did try to put him on the Homeland Security board until public outcry thankfully prevented that blunder from happening.


by DCPatriot on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:41:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

I agree with Jerome. He has earned expulsion. Exit polling shows he only won reelection with the aid of white Republican voters who knew this day would come and preferred it over having Carter in office.

Boot the fool.

Yes, there have been corrupt precincts and machines in many US cities throughout US history, but it's not New Orleans where the problem lies. It's the state: Louisiana politics has been among the worst since about forever.

In recent years, however, the shenanigans of Katherine Harris in Florida, Blackwell in Ohio, and the White House ops led by Karl Rove have certainly matched Louisiana's corruption.

They deserve to be Jefferson's bunkies.


by KevinHayden on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 11:04:29 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Yeah, and don't rebuild our levees, either.

That'll show us.


by DrAsh on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 11:07:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

gimme a break (none / 0)

do you honestly think that dollar bill jefferson is an effective advocate for nola right now?  you can't possibly believe that replacing him with a new member of congress would hurt the rebuilding of the levees.


by loolool on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 11:24:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gimme a break (none / 0)

Amerika won't rebuild the levees anyway, so it's a moot point.  

It's not a campaign issue for any of the presidential candidates, and at this point, the Dems are more interested in punishing Jefferson than in realizing the fallout it will cause for the people of New Orleans.


by DrAsh on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gimme a break (1.00 / 1)

you actually voted for him, didn't you?


by loolool on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 03:14:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gimme a break (none / 0)

No, mook, I voted for Carter.  But you still get to be self-righteous, and say things like "they should know better than to live there".  


by DrAsh on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 12:18:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gimme a break (none / 0)

you just called me self-righteous, and then put that ridiculous comment in my mouth?  i'm guessing you don't see the irony in that statement.

p.s.  former resident of the marigny.


by loolool on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:12:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gimme a break (3.00 / 2)

It's not a campaign issue for any of the presidential candidates

I otherwise don't like her, but it's an issue for Hillary.


by dantsmith on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 11:46:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

KevinHayden, Sure would be nice of you to post a link to the supporting polling data you suggested.

Thanks


by eureka springs on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:26:41 AM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (3.00 / 2)

Here's a start, with multiple takes on analysis:  

http://dapoblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/la- representative-us-2nd-congressional.html

Follow all the links and read the comments.  Like everything else about New Orleans politics, this election can't be reduced to white vs. black.  You also need to grok Republican vs. Democrat, West bank vs. East bank (LA-02 spans both), Orleans Parish vs. Jefferson Parish (again, LA-02 spans both, and both parishes span both east bank and west bank), BOLD vs. Progressive Democrats (don't know what those are?  good luck understanding the election then), Spike Lee vs. Harry Lee, wet vs. dry...

There are a lot of competing constituencies in LA-02, and Jefferson's election may have been more about secondary issues than about us "wanting" a corrupt Congressman.  Loyalty to Democratic GOTV organizations, dislike for the controversial Karen Carter, maneuvering for the next election post-indictment, or GOP spoilers may all have played a role.

The Democratic blogosphere outsiders never understood these subtleties, which is why darkening the skies with Kossacks bearing net.cash was such a loser of a strategy.

As Jeffrey of Library Chronicles likes to say, "All politics is local, but New Orleans politics is localer."


by ray in new orleans on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 02:15:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (3.00 / 1)


Expulsion is historically almost unheard of.  Why?  Well, it has something to do with democracy.  Jefferson was re-elected by his constituents.  Now it's true that most of them are African-American but I am surprised to read on this blog such contempt for those citizens.

But given, "Congressional black criminals" maybe we're just reading trolls.

Consider the precedent: U.S. attorneys loyal to a radical member of one party start to prosecute Congressional representatives of the other party for corruption.  Every indictment equals an expulsion from the House.  Yeah, that sounds real good for democracy.  

But there was cash in his freezer!  Well, I didn't see his freezer but even if he hasn't been set up, he may have other reasons for the cash, none fantastic but not necessarily a result of a bribe.  Most important is the need to remember that an indictment is a long way from a conviction.

There could be an ethics investigation within the House, but Jefferson doesn't work for Pelosi, the Dem leadership, or anyone other than his constituents.

And to trash his district or Louisiana dems, or the CBC for his re-election and support within the caucus is politically and racially retarded.
The CBC is the most reliable source of progressive ideas and rock-solid support within the Dem caucus.  To treat them with disrespect is the quickest route to a dissolution of party power.  I have to assume those doing so are just trying to cause problems (trolls) or are too jejeune to be taken seriously.

The culture of corruption is not about individual representatives...it is about a CULTURE that prevent meaningful lobbying restrictions, campaign finance reform and the public funding of elections.  That's what the Dem leadership needs to maintain as their focus.


by Thaddeus on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 12:18:17 PM EST

Re: Kick Jefferson out of the House (none / 0)

Expulsion is pretty damn rare in Congress. The vast majority of expelled members were kicked out for treason for supporting the Confederate rebellion. The only other members who have been expelled are Jim Traficant in 2002, Michael Myers in 1980, and William Blount in 1797. That's it.

Traficant was expelled after being convicted of massive corruption. Myers was expelled after being convicted of accepting bribes in ABSCAM. And Blount was expelled for treason and conspiracy to incite the Creek and Cherokee Indians to assist Great Britain in invading Florida. That's serious shit!

Congress does not expel members for being indicted.


by ECLE on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:54:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

if you are worried about Dems losing a seat (none / 0)

Dems should worry that nearly 80% of the African Americans from New Orleans have not returned, and that redestricting plans are already in the works.

Instead of trying to take Jefferson out, as many inside the beltway bloggers did over the midterms, Dems should worry that government refusal to re-open public and affordable housing in New Orleans means that most African-Americans have been denied their right to return.  While displaced residents languish in formaldehyde leaking FEMA trailers throughout the Gulf Coast, extremely conservative upper class whites- and their campaign contributing developer friends- have returned to do their worst. (check David Vitter's slush fund from 06 and follow the money yourselves).  We're not just losing our culture and our heritage, we're losing the Black vote (literally, as in we don't know where they are).  
I understand the national implications, but corruption is pretty run of the mill here: it wouldn't mean that Dems would lose the seat [see: Gov Edwin Edwards, Mayor Marc Morial].  Dems WILL lose the seat, however, if Blacks are not able to return, the district is redrawn and a much more discreet-and legal- money in politics reigns.


by monikanola on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 01:02:33 PM EST

Re: if you are worried about Dems losing a seat (none / 0)

Don't worry, the CBC will bus them back in for the next election, so that we can have another go at an "elected" congressperson whom the people that actually live here didn't elect.

Also: If Jefferson steps down now, Karen Carter may have a chance at his seat.  


by maitri on Tue Jun 05, 2007 at 02:38:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if you are worried about Dems losing a seat (none / 0)

It seems to me dearie that you aren't here in New Orleans. Most of the rebuilding work and planning is being done by good folks, both White and Black.

Walk the neighborhoods as I do... yak with folks about what they are doing to rebuild. It's all of us trying to get back.

My partner and I aren't rich, and we are putting ourselves into debt for the rest of our lives to rebuild (and we don't live in a Flood Zone), but we love our city.

Many of those who haven't returned are just too lazy to go through the crap that the 200,000 of us are living with. I don't want those folks back.

And before you pull the Race card from your sleeve, understand that I am old Creole, and Islanos, and Haitian... and I'm whiter than the snow. My people have been here since the beginning, and we and our friends are getting this city back on it's feet.

We love our homeplace, and we are fighting to keep it alive. Anyone who doesn't have the stomach for a fight... just don't come here. We don't need lazy people.

The birth of the new American Progressive party is going down right now in New Orleans, and the donkey-elephant hybrids better start running.


"Witch by Nature, Bitch by Choice, New Orleanian by Blood"
by GentillyGirl on Wed Jun 06, 2007 at 02:59:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.