CA-37: Election Day

Today, voters in California's 37th, a district that includes parts of Long Beach extending up to Compton and much of South Los Angeles, will be going to the polls to elect a new representative to congress. The seat has been vacant since the death of Democratic Congresswoman Juanita Millender-McDonald of cancer in April. The seat is safe Democratic.

There are 18 candidates on the ballot but 2 have emerged as the front-runners: state Senator Jenny Oropeza and Assemblywoman Laura Richardson (Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald's daughter Valerie McDonald is running as well but is far behind in money and endorsements.)

There are a couple of interesting dynamics at play. First, there's race. The diverse district has traditionally been represented in Congress by an African-American but this year, with the strength of Sen. Oropeza's campaign, we may see the first hispanic elected from this district, signaling the growing influence of the hispanic electorate in Southern California. Hispanics make up 20% of CA-37 voters, while 25% are black. The LA Times cites a poll that shows that Oropeza, an hispanic, may benefit from the presence of Valerie McDonald in the race, as she and Richardson, both African-American, may split the black vote.

Another dynamic that is at play here is the influence of tribal gaming money vs. the old fashioned on the ground organizing that comes with labor support. Juls at calitics has the story:

State Senator Jenny Oropeza, as dday detailed on Saturday, has been the beneficiary of over $270,000 in independent spending from the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.  The tribe has dropped mailers, door hangers, newspaper ads and called voters in a push to repay Oropeza for voting for the massive gaming expansion. That vote was one factor for the LA County Labor Federation's support of Assemblywoman Laura Richardson. They are spending their money on member to member communication, urging the members of their local affiliated unions to vote for Richardson.

Oropeza's vote to expand the number of slot machines at the Morongo Casino was widely seen as a swipe at labor because the compacts do not include provisions to allow workers to fully organize and collectively bargain.

While Oropeza enjoys support from the Morongo tribe and the California Democratic Party, as well as local hispanic groups, Richardson has the backing of Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles) and the California Legislative Black Caucus in addition to the influential LA County Labor Federation. The race is considered too close to call.

Polls close at 8pm tonight and the winner must take 50% of the vote to avoid an August 21 run-off.

Update [2007-6-26 17:13:24 by Todd Beeton]: Thanks to dblhelix in the comments for clarifying that the run-off in August (if necessary) will be between the top vote getters of each party. In other words, today's winner will be the next representative from CA-37.

And on the racial make-up of the district, from The Hill:

The district...[has] 25 percent black registered voters to 22 percent Latinos, Jeffe said. She also noted that Latinos are 43 percent of the district’s population to 25 percent for blacks. Turnout is expected to be as low as 10 percent today.



Display:


Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

On the issue of Oropeza and the tribal casinos, I commend to you EBW's analysis at Wampum, which specifies that the issue is unions not wanting to agree to tribal-preference provisions that sovereign tribes usually prefer in their contracts.  So Oropeza's position can be viewed positively as an affirmation of tribal sovereignty and not merely as a "swipe at labor."


by Colorado Luis on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 12:16:00 PM EST

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

Is the runoff top vote-getters by party or the top two (irrespective of party)?


by dblhelix on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:03:59 PM EST

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

top 2 irrespective of party.


by Todd Beeton on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:26:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

Todd,

I've been following this race, but I've seen no shortage of newspaper accts from CA that indicate that it's by party. For example:

There will be 17 candidates on every ballot June 26. If any one candidate can garner 50% of the vote in that special election, he or she would serve the remainder of Millender-McDonald's term.

If no candidate reaches that threshold, an Aug. 6 run-off election featuring the top vote getter from each party would take place.

The only time I've seen reference to two top vote getters is in yesterday's Long Beach paper.


by dblhelix on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:37:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

CA Special Election laws (none / 0)

   The runoff will be between the top votegetters of each party, meaning that it is a formality. The real election is for top Democrat today; she will be the next Representative.
   I don't see how anyone gets 50%+1 today so there will be a delay in getting a Representative, but we will know who she will be after today.
by Zack from the SFV on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 03:12:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

forgive me. thanks for the correction.


by Todd Beeton on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 05:02:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another Candidate (none / 0)

There's also Peter Mathews, a grassroots progressive, endorse by Progressive Democrats of LA, who nearly unseated Steve Horne back in the 1990s, before lines were redrawn, with no help from the party.

Returning the favor of total neglect, he has run primary challenges against Millender-MacDonald, and gotten over 10,000 votes, which takes some doing and some real organization.  No telling how well he'll do this time out, but he's a guy who was basically a decade ahead of the emergence of the netroots.

His website it here.


by Paul Rosenberg on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:07:14 PM EST

Re: Another Candidate (none / 0)

    Third place, if McDonald is weak. Otherwise fourth or fifth. (I like Mathews but...)
    Mathews was the nominee in 1998, getting 44% of the vote to Steve Horn's 53%. In 2000 Gerrie Schipske ran a stronger race, losing to Horn by only 1,768 votes. Horn's district was carved up in the redistricting, with much of it going into Millender-McDonald's district and some into the new 39th (Linda Sanchez' seat). Horn chose to retire rather than lose to Sanchez or Millender-McDonald).
by Zack from the SFV on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 03:21:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Schipske Had More Institutional Support (none / 0)

Schipske certainly did better.  And it looked like she would run this time, right up to the last minute.

But she had support from within the gay and lesbian community (Long Beach is second only to West Hollywood as a center of the gay and lesbian community in the LA region) that gave her a significant leg up, as well as the expectations raised by Mathews, which caused people to lend more support when she ran.  But neither of them got the support that was warranted.

As for McDonald, I expect her to be weak.  She appears to have been running in stealth mode.  No web presence--unless that's changed in the last week or so--for example.  Poor response to media inguiries. No real institutional base.

If she had wanted a political career, it would have been easy for her to have established a resume and a base.  Instead, she just popped her head up after her mother died, and said, "Hello! Here I am!  Come crown I mean vote for me!"  I don't think she made a lot of friends doing that.

BTW, early voting had been quite light at my precinct when I went to vote around noon, as you might expect.  GOTV looks to be very important.  If Richardson makes it, she will owe labor, big time.  Whether she pays her debts, that's another matter.


by Paul Rosenberg on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 04:27:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CA-37: Election Day (3.00 / 1)

This quote from your source is absurd:

"Richardson is being supported by the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, which is categorically opposed to California entering gaming compacts that allow labor contracts with Indian preference language to exist -- and it wasn't so long ago that Blacks, Hispanics or Women weren't good enough for Federation of Labor affiliated unions to admit or protect."

The L.A. County Fed is currently headed up by Maria Elena Durazo, a Latina and a giant of labor and immigration struggles.  Her predecessor (and late husband), Miguel Contreras, a labor legend in California, is the son of immigrant farmworkers who used to organize with Cesar Chavez.  The casino workers who are struggling for fair treatment by casino operators are primarily Latino.  To imply that labor's position on tribal compacts is based on bigotry is ridiculous and disingenuous.


by Woodhouse on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:07:41 PM EST

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

Sorry -- this was meant as a reply to the first comment.


by Woodhouse on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 01:09:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

I didn't read EBW as implying that the unions are bigoted so much as pointing out that the unions' position on this issue hurts members of the Native American tribes with whom they are dealing.  But why not ask him on his own blog?


by Colorado Luis on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 02:08:00 PM EST

Re: CA-37: Election Day (none / 0)

I understand what you are saying about it not being your writing, but let me take this opportunity to further explain labor's opposition to these particular compacts.  Labor does not oppose gambling expansion, but wants to ensure that workers right are protected when and if that does happen.  Because the tribes are sovereign they are not subjected to Californian labor law.  The only way that happens is if it is included in the compacts.

The biggest issue is the failure to include check cards like was done in the last round of expansion.  This is an excerpt from a letter that a number of labor leaders sent to the Democratic legislative leaders.

In contrast to most previous compacts submitted by the Governor in 2004, this compact--and presumably others to come--removes from the Tribal Labor Relations Ordinance the right for tribal casino workers (who are virtually all not tribal members) to freely choose whether they want unionization through card check, and to establish a level playing field for their pursuit of decent wages, benets and working conditions. Instead, the Governor has reverted to the 1999 procedures for unionization, even though Speaker Núñez and Senate Majority Leader Gloria Romero conducted a detailed study of those procedures and found them severely deficient and ineffective.

I have a lot more over at Working Californians.


by juls on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 03:31:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Demographics (none / 0)

You're a little off with the population numbers... according to the 2005 estimate, the 37th was 22.2% black and 47.6% Hispanic. (In the 2000 census, it was 24.7% black and 43.2% Hispanic.)


by Crazy Vaclav on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 04:19:50 PM EST

Re: Demographics (none / 0)

likely voter demographics are quite different.


by dblhelix on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 04:47:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Now I get it. (1.00 / 1)

We would not want to disrupt your inside access to the Edwards campaign now would we?


Obama Citizen Ad Videos
by lovingj on Tue Jun 26, 2007 at 05:09:49 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.