Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over GOPers

PoliticalMoneyLine has compiled the latest filings from the Democratic and Republican party committees (which take into account fundraising and spending through the end of May), and the numbers look a little something like this:

CommitteeMay ReceiptsMay DisbursementsMay Cash-on-HandMay Debts & Obligations
DSCC$4,361,708$2,183,820$14,259,634$5,000,000
NRSC$3,320,496$2,477,583$4,262,112$0
DCCC$4,518,748$2,344,286$11,527,459$4,610,458
NRCC$4,525,649$4,301,257$1,826,711$6,775,000
DNC$4,943,314$5,570,237$5,471,252$2,500,000
RNC$6,767,435$5,972,623$15,038,391$0
Total
Democrats
$13,823,770$10,098,343$31,258,345$13,658,610
Total
Republicans
$12,110,458 $14,613,580$12,751,463$22,127,214$6,775,000

Over the last month (you can see the last set of numbers here), the Democrats have extended their cash-on-hand lead over the Republicans by about $800,000 dollars to over $9.1 million. Even when debts and obligations are taken into account, the Democrats' cash-on-hand lead still increased, though slightly more narrowly, by about $300,000 to roughly $2.25 million.

The Republican committees, particularly the NRCC but also the NRSC, aren't doing themselves any favors with their remarkably high burn through rates. In the cases of the congressional committees, the Democrats outraised or nearly outraised their Republican counterparts while being greatly outspent at the same time, helping increase their cash-on-hand lead.

One, of course, would like to see the DNC doing as well against the RNC as the DCCC and DSCC are doing against the NRCC and NRSC, respectively. Nonetheless, the fact that the RNC's cash-on-hand level at this point is less than half of what it was at the same point in 2005 ($15 million versus $32.7 million) and more than a quarter less than it was at the same point in 2003 ($15 million versus $21 million) while the DNC is running better than it did in 2003 and only slightly less well than it did in 2005 ($5.4 million in 2007, versus roughly $8 million in 2005 and roughly $4.2 million in 2004) makes one realize that things are certainly moving in the right direction.

Needless to say, these numbers do not ensure victory for the Democrats in 2008. That said, they are indicative of the fact that the Democrats have a great opportunity to build on the successes of 2006 this cycle and put more progressives into elective office.



Display:


Re: Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over G (none / 0)

The Total May Receipts for Republicans is wrong - it should be "$14,613,580" unless you made a mistake in one of the earlier figures.  Republicans, then, beat Dems for the month due to the RNC's advantage over the DNC.


by umcpgreg on Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 06:46:58 PM EST

Re: Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over G (none / 0)

Thanks. That's correct. The Dems still have the same cash-on-hand advantage however.
Blogging here @ MyDD.com. Twittering @jonathanhsinger.
by Jonathan Singer on Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 06:53:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over G (none / 0)

It might be a big job, but you should consider doing a post like this when the Congressional candidates file their returns. I know Franken pretty much held his own with Coleman in Minnesota last quarter, but I feel a little bit in the dark when it comes to other races around the country.


Never separate the life you live from the words you speak. -Sen. Paul Wellstone (Minnesota)
by Max Fletcher on Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 07:45:05 PM EST

Re: Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over G (none / 0)

Anyone care to offer some insight on the 'debt' some of these organizations are holding? Who, excatly, lends this money?


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 09:17:13 PM EST

Re: Dem Committees Extend Cash-on-Hand Lead Over G (none / 0)

banks?

I think it all came from the 2006 cycle, when the committees took out loans to try to win a few extra seats.


Never separate the life you live from the words you speak. -Sen. Paul Wellstone (Minnesota)
by Max Fletcher on Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 12:42:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.