TBA continued

Mike Gravel, guess who introduced him? OK, Ralph Nader, who included references to ancient Rome in a speech that went well over 10 minutes. Power to the People! Gravel laid out his scenario for getting Bush to end the war, the gist being that a bill gets passed by Reid and Pelosi not closing down Congress, for anything, until its passed. Gravel spoke half as long as Ralph Nader, which was cool, with the kicker quote that "The Constituion is not a very democratic document, ours is the Bill of Rights."

Bill Richardson was introduced by 4 brothers who were from the only family to have 4 soldiers in Vietnam. Richardson draws out the analogy to Vietnam and Iraq, and says, when you listen to some that are running for President, he doesn't hear a position like his on Iraq. The Democrats are aligned with the people, and Democrats need to address the two biggest mistakes of Bush: failing to address climate change and the disasterous policies in Iraq.

Richardson says he has the most ambitious plan of anyone running for President in the area of climate change and lays out a few points and benchmarks, and talks about how he did it in New Mexico, then he's onto his "New Realism" in foreign policy.

Here are some loose quotes from Richardson: There is a fundamental difference, and that's how many troops each of us would leave behind. Other than those at the embassy, I would leave zero troops. No Airbases, no embedded troops, no one doing training. "It's not worthy of one more loss of human life." Clinton, Biden, Dodd and Obama, they all voted for allowing troops in Iraq for an indefinite time for "training" and "protecting" in Iraq. My opponents have voted to leave troops behind. Clinton, and Obama, "leave troops behind" and even Edwards, with the bill he says he wants to pass "again and again" would be in favor of more troops if that bill were to pass (it included maintaining troops). Over 70% of Iraqi's want us out; over 60% have said its ok to kill Americans. For those who think we should leave a residual force, for how long?  There's not a single sign that it's improving... how many Americans must die... we need to bring them all home... NoTroopsLeftBehind.com Bring them home within six months, and then begin the diplomatic work... a national reconciliation for Iraq... none of the other countries in the middle east want a civil war in Iraq, and they will solve the problem once the Americans leave... bring back diplomacy, make peace with your enemies... my worldview is different than my collegues.

Overall, a well received speech, with a lot of claps toward the end; very focused and delivered well. I heard that the Richardson team was going to put segments of the video online. This is a Richardson that is drawing out distinctions, and it's pretty compelling.

The blogosphere panel is where I'm at now, lots of familiar faces up on the stage, including Bowers Stoller, Hamsher, Willis, then back over to the main hall at noon to hear Obama and Edwards.

Jim Dean is also on this panel, talking about DFA's grassroots-netroots efforts. Dean said, "we need to be blogging", I agree (oldie but goodie):


Stoller credits the "We Can Do Better" slogan with winning the 2006 elections, lol.

Display:


Re: TBA continued (none / 0)

In so many ways, Richardson stands head-and-shoulders above the rest of the field, both in experience and in proposals for moving forward on many issues.  The choice here is clear.


by GraniteMan on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 10:46:24 AM EST

Re: TBA continued (none / 0)

Too bad he's an idiot. His favorite SCOTUS justice was anti-roe 'Whizzer' White, because he was an Athlete.
He also has a 'zipper problem' a-la Clinton (that's the rumor, anyhow)
And he takes plenty of money from big pharma and big health care, just like Hillary.

Single Payer advocates in NM are glad he's out, because he was a clear roadblock to getting something meaningful done there.

In other words, I disagree.


by mermzilla on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 11:34:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: TBA continued (none / 0)

I really don't get the whole 'resume' candidate thing.  Yes, he has a good resume.  So do lots of political appointees that make the rounds and leverage their last gig into the next one, continuing to build their resume.

What's important is a vision for where this country can and should be, and I think for us, finding a candidate that is going to do the most for the progressive movement.  That's clearly not something where Bill Richardson even comes close to matching up with anyone else.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 12:49:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Richardson... (none / 0)

has been less than impressive so far in debates and on Meet the Press.  And that gaffe in Iowa last week where the audience had to remind him that France was a permanent member of the Security Council?  Considering one of his resume points is "UN Ambassador", not good.

His polling bump seems to be ad-driven...but we'll see.  Needs to tighten up the ship, though.

The guy to feel sorry for is Chris Dodd.  Lots of hard work...and nothing.


by rashomon on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 01:21:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson... (none / 0)

And Dodd actually makes some sense.  I've been voting him my #3 after Edwards and other in the straw polls here.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 04:21:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson... (none / 0)

I've been making Dodd 1 or 2 in all the polls I've taken. Nobody else is making his points on civil liberties.


by joyful alternative on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 06:30:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: TBA continued (none / 0)

If Richardson was really for no troops left behind then he shouldn't have them stationed in Kuwait.  I think the difference teeters on semantical.  And realistically, once we start withdrawing, the situation is going to be so fluid that I don't believe anyone can say with certainty where troops will be stationed if any are left in the region.


by Doug Dilg on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 11:36:35 AM EST

Too bad Richardsons all talk and only cares what's (none / 0)

on paper.  

Even to the extent when he has an event to cut down on light polution.  LOL HE only issues a decree that it's bad, he doesn't do one thing to stop it. Almost funny if it weren't so sad.

Good thing he just dumped his 500K Oil Refinery stock...and you wonder why he says there's no gouging from the Oil companies?

Ask Mr. Deal maker why it seems everyone who gives him a HUGE contrbution has won tax dollars to fund their private businesses.

And here's a little article you might enjoy being you're talking about his environmental "promises".

The Two Faces of Richardson
http://thesun-news.com/


by LindaSFNM on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 11:52:21 AM EST

Re: TBA continued (3.00 / 1)

Jerome, I'd love to be there now, but I'm blogging right now and I really need you to be blogging too.


www.adamconner7.com
by Adam Conner on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 12:22:21 PM EST

Re: TBA continued (none / 0)

I think Richardson will soon achieve the position Edwards is now seeing slip through his fingers. Is the Gov telegenic? No. Does he goof up his answers sometimes? Sure. Is he smart enough to do the job. Why, yes. Is Iraq the most important thing facing our nation today? Indeed. Will all progressives basically move the chips incrementally in the same direction on choice, the environment, energy, labor, education, healthcare? I believe so. That's why Bill's my guy.


by kate for dean on Tue Jun 19, 2007 at 08:07:30 PM EST

Richards will be a great President (none / 0)

I find it amazing that the same people that say Obama was tired when he said 10,000 people were killed in a tornado in Kansas, give Obama a break, what's the big deal, jump all over Richardson when he loses his train of thought and makes a gaffe.  

These candidates are working far harder probably than anyone on this thread - campaigning 12+ hours a day in multiple time zones.  They are going to make mistakes from lack of sleep and exhaustion, particularly when they have to give instant answers on an incredible range of topics.

For the open minded, here are postings from 2 New Mexican Democrats on why they are supporting him:

--------------

Bill Richardson has a knack for giving diverse groups what they want most without terminally alienating people who don't want that, whatever "that" happens to be.  He gave the pugs an upper tax bracket rate cut right out of the box in 2003, which pissed off a lot of liberal Democrats like me.

However, there were a few things I didn't know at the time which the Governor certainly did.  First, the tax cut didn't take effect immediately.  When oil prices went through the roof, the state had a windfall of revenue despite the loss from the income tax.  If oil and gas prices hadn't shot up the way they did, he could have put off the tax cut a while longer.  Second, by giving pug voters what they wanted most, he was able to set the stage for several important liberal initiatives that would have been more difficult to achieve otherwise.

He convinced the voters to allow more investment money (our "Permanent Fund" from oil, gas, and mineral severance taxes) to be used for education.  It was a very close vote, but he got it done.

He convinced the legislature to spend a huge amount of money for a commuter train between Belen (south of Albuquerque) and Santa Fe, which has been talked about for more than 20 years.  This train will likely be extended south to Las Cruces and North to the Colorado border, where it will possibly connect to the incipient Colorado commuter train system.  We will soon have commuter rail linking the major metropolitan areas of the state, which now don't even have bus service between them!  This is a really big deal for New Mexicans, and Big Bill set it all up by cutting Repugnant opposition off at the knees by giving them their core economic need.

Gov. Richardson even convinced the legislature and southern NM voters to approve even more money for a commercial spaceport, which will fuel economic development in that depressed part of the state for at least the next 50 years.  

Most important to me, Governor Richardson got behind the paper ballot early in 2005, recognizing that his Democratic base needed to know that they weren't being cheated at the ballot box.  I can tell you that we would not have the paper ballot in NM without he Governor's support.  Period.

Governor Richardson actually represents all of his constituents.  When he was my Congressman in ultra-liberal Santa Fe, he was reliably liberal, leading the fight against WIPP, the radioactive dump we have here.  When he couldn't delay it any longer, he made good and sure that we got the Federal highway money we needed so that radioactive waste wouldn't be shipped through the center of town.  What's more, he told people exactly what he had to do, even though they didn't want to hear it.

Now that he's the Governor of the whole state, including the heavily conservative southern part of the state, he has more varied interests to serve.  Yet I'm certain that he's still just as liberal as he used to be.  Sometimes I don't understand what he's trying to accomplish, but I can't argue with the results.  Bill Richardson is a political genius.

Bill Richardson was reelected in the biggest landslide in NM history because he does a great job.  He's done amazing things in NM, and if you give him a chance he'll do great things for the whole country.  We need him.

-------------

For those of you who don't already know me, I am Cara Valente-Compton. During the week I am a mild-mannered stay at home mom of four small kids in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Well, maybe not so mild-mannered, depending on the day. Today, for instance, I am dealing with the emotions of a 9 year old who is being manipulated by her "BFF" and a 5 year old eating popcicles in her closet, so I am a little on the grouchy side. On the weekends I work at a local Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, helping the nurses care for the preemies and sick babies. I love it.

I have had a lifelong passion for politics. I remember watching the 1972 conventions, both democratic and republican, with my parents. I was four. I have watched every convention since, for both parties. I was raised to make an informed choice between the parties, but I knew the moment I saw Jimmy Carter speak at the DNC in 1976 that I was a democrat. My father even tried to take me to a Gerry Ford rally at the Winston-Salem airport, but I threw up on the tarmac.

Over the years I have worked hard for a number of candidates. I started with Dukakis in 1988, and was wildly enthusiastic for Clinton in 1992 and 1996. But I have never been so sure of a candidate in my life as I am of Bill Richardson.

Yes, that's right. I am betting on the dark horse in the race this time, and here is why...

First I must say that I have personal reasons for liking Bill Richardson so much. Back in 1990 I was a Bernalillo County Young Democrat and was asked by a Lt. Governor candidate to make a speech for him at our state party convention. It was my first opportunity to speak to a large group, and I was pretty nervous. Well Bill Richardson, then Congressman from northern New Mexico, was on the dais with me, and we met and exchanged a few words and I told him how nervous I was, and he was so great. He said not to worry, just pretend it was a group of five, not five hundred, relax, and be natural. I took his advice, and it worked. I didn't speak for more than about five minutes, but it was pretty easy after his pep talk. When I was done he gave me a big, fatherly hug and said, "You did such a great job I am going to let you give all my speeches from now on!" I knew he was just saying that, but it really made me feel better, and I never had problems speaking in public again.

Now, that said, I have a number of other reasons to be supporting Richardson, and honestly if I felt that there was one other candidate more worthy of support I would be working for her or him. But there isn't. Bill Richardson is by far the superior candidate of either party.

Richardson's foriegn policy credientials are widely known in the political world. He served under Bill Clinton as the UN Ambassador, and has negotiated with hostile leaders on a number of occasions to release hostages and prisoners. He even brokered a cease fire agreement between Al Bashir and the rebel leaders in Darfur. Other American diplomatic efforts were rebuked, I have heard that Al Bashir refused to meet with Jesse Jackson, he refused to meet with Barak Obama. Though the cease-fire was fragile and broken within days, Richardson knows how to negotiate and leverage third party relationships to acheive peaceful resolutions to conflict.

Bill Richardson is also the strongest candidate on the issue of Iraq, and is demanding that Congress act NOW to remove our troops, not wait until October to think about it.

I am most concerned, as a mom of four, about how a president leads our nation at home, and Richardson's domestic accomplishments are really vast. On a personal note, again, my husband and I left New Mexico in 1996 shortly after we were married because we didn't feel that we could raise a family here. The economy was terrible, we were young and dead broke, and the job market was awful. Crime was really high. Everywhere it seemed was bad news, and we decided that we wanted to have kids right away, and so we moved to Missouri. It took us nine years to get back home, and we are so glad to be back.

Since returning to New Mexico we have been amazed at the changes, and credit the improvements in large part to Bill Richardson. Job creation in New Mexico is particularly impressive, with 82,000 new jobs having been created under Bill Richardson's watch. Now in a state of about 1.5 million, that is a huge improvement. Richardson encouraged companies to bring their businesses here by offering tax incentives to businesses that paid employees over the prevailing wage, so these are by and large great jobs. They are also innovative companies, like Tesla Motors, building mid-sized electric cars, Eclipse Aviation, and new alternative energy plants, such as biomass, solar, and wind farms.

Speaking of energy, Richardson was the former Secretary of Energy. As Governor, Richardson fought for the creation of a light rail system that has connected the major towns and cities along the Rio Grande Corridor, from Belen to Bernalillo, and will eventually reach past Santa Fe to Las Vegas. The League of Conservation Voters says that Bill Richardson is the strongest candidate on energy and environmental issues, and can "restore America's reputation as leaders" in this all too important issue. Richardson's plan calls for a huge reduction in carbon emissions over the next decade, and New Mexico is following the Kyoto accord. Richardson also has a new book on the horizon, "Leading By Example: How We Can Inspire an Energy and Security Revolution" which is slated for release in November.

Richardson has brought real tax relief to every New Mexican by reducing state income taxes, and eliminating sales taxes on food and medicine altogether. New Mexicans now have more of their own money to spend. In doing this he has also managed to fund social programs, like pre-k programs, and balance the state budget.

Richardson has a great record on health care. Thanks to him every child in our state is covered until age 5. It is far from universal coverage, but it is a good start. And thanks to his efforts and the efforts of his wife Barbara the number of children lacking immunizations is down dramatically. The Richardsons have also helped to create a new wing at the University of New Mexico Hospital, called the Bill and Barbara Richardson Pavillion, which deals largely in pediatric medicine, with intensive care units for infants and childrens and a new emergency room for "peds". He has also committed New Mexico to a leadership role in stem cell research, and this year signed into law a bill legalizing the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Bill Richardson has also been instrumental in law enforcement. New Mexico has traditionally had a huge problem with drunk driving, and under this administration's tough standards drunk driving is down significantly. Also, being a very rural state, we were developing a huge problem with meth labs. Richardson has cracked down on this problem, making harder to attain the ingredients for meth and aiding law enforcement in cracking down on offenders.

Is it any wonder, in light of all he has done for New Mexico, that Jon Stewart of the Daily Show called Bill Richardson "Batman"? I personally agree. We need a hero for President, not empty rhetoric. Join me in supporting Bill Richardson, and visit my grassroots website at www.richardsonbringshope.com. If you have any questions, too, you can email me at cara@richardsonbringshope.com


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Wed Jun 20, 2007 at 02:27:44 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.