Farm Bill Subsidies: Who's the Biggest Winner of them All?

EWG DatabaseDan Owens is a Rural Policy Organizer at the Center for Rural Affairs in Lyons, Nebraska. This is part of Farm Bill blogging.

Today the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released their latest and greatest version of the (in)famous farm subsidy database. The database can be accessed through their MULCH blog.

The new database also utilizes Google Maps to map recipients of farm program payments. Whether you live in a rural or urban area, you are guaranteed to be surprised by the number and size of recipients that live in your area.

For the first time ever, the database incorporates additional data provided by the USDA that more accurately tracks farm program payments to individual beneficiaries. Prior to this, individual recipients could hide behind multiple "pass-throughs" -- partnerships and corporations set up to exploit farm program loopholes and blow right by existing payment limits.

Ever since EWG released the first version of their database, big commodity groups have been claiming that EWG somehow "distorts" the data for its own purposes.

Right. Ignore those comments, and look at the data for what it is: yet another illustration of the urgent need for payment limits in farm programs. Of course, the first question everyone asks is: Who gets the most money from farm programs? Who's The King?

As revealed in the new data, the current answer to that question is one Maurice Wilder, resident of Florida. Mr. Wilder received a total of $3,217,158 in farm program payments from 2003-2005.

Who is Maurice Wilder, you may ask?

Well, Maurice Wilder just happened to be profiled in my local Omaha World-Herald this past weekend. While he isn't busy farming farm programs for oodles of cash, he's pumping oodles of Nebraska's precious groundwater. Or, to be precise, somebody else is pumping it for him:

A man who owns 125 Nebraska irrigation wells has never drilled a single one. Maurice Wilder, 66, of Clearwater, Fla., primarily develops retirement communities, recreational vehicle parks and office buildings in Florida and Texas. And he's never lived here.

As noted above, The King of Farm Programs doesn't confine himself to farming, either. Check out the following data on our little buddy:

* Total holdings nationwide estimated at $500 million in 2005.
* Owns 10 office buildings in the Tampa Bay, Fla., area with more than 1 million square feet of space.
* Has 4,500 mobile home lots and 12,500 recreational vehicle lots in Florida and Texas.
* Commercial and residential land holdings.
* Owns 200,000 acres of farmland and ranch land in eight states. That's roughly 312 square miles, or nearly the size of Douglas County.

Wow. Can somebody please tell me what The King has done to deserve $3.2 million from the US Treasury?

This all goes right to the heart of farm program ideology, which I wrote about in a previous post. If you believe farm programs should exist to help family farmers, The King and his millions are an outrage -- an offensive example of wasteful farm program spending.

But as it is, farm programs support every single unit of agricultural production, and there is no real limit on the number of units you can collect payments on. Consequently, the nation's largest farms pull down multi-million dollar subsidy checks, despite the claims of politicians and the media that payment limits do exist. (By the way, The King gets most of his money from commodity certificates, which were explicitly set up to evade payment limits).

To be sure, there will be a big ruffle-duffle over the data, with case studies and finger pointing and rhetoric all around. And when you hear organizations whine about how The King is an aberration, a lone example of farm programs gone bad, don't believe it. All you need to remember is that what The King is doing is perfectly legal, because our elected representatives have made it that way.

Check out the EWG database and get yourself all riled up. Then contact the nearest elected representative and tell them you support limiting farm program payments. This year's Dorgan-Grassley bill is a great place to start.



Display:


Re: Farm Bill Subsidies: Who's the Biggest Winner (none / 0)

What has The King done to deserve $3.2 million from the US Treasury, Dan? How about a cool $12,000 to the Republican party?
http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search .asp?key=9wt3q&txtName=Wilder,%20Mau rice%20&txtState=FL&txtAll=Y& ;Order=N
by AdyBarkan on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 02:18:02 AM EST

That's a pretty hefty return on investment! (none / 0)

$3.2M in exchange for $12K in contributions?  Wow!  If I could get that sort of bang for my buck, I'd be writing $12K in checks tomorrow!  

Man, how do I get in on this gravy train??


by RT on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 09:07:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Farm Bill Subsidies: Who's the Biggest Winner (none / 0)

Thanks, this is really interesting.  I'm reading "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and it has made me very interested in farm policy.  


by prince myshkin on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 02:33:24 AM EST

1.1 billion to California... (none / 0)

I, too, am done with subsidy to ag.  Another great American rip off.  


by dkmich on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 06:17:10 AM EST

Re: Farm Bill Subsidies: (none / 0)

oh quit your whining.. Typical of Dem progressives. I want to know where I sign up to get my subsidy checks. I've alway wanted to be a free enterpriser! and I can call myself a farmer to boot.


by Skipster on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 08:51:28 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.