More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP

It may be hard to remember or even imagine now, but Illinois used to be a more politically balanced state. For instance George H.W. Bush won in the Land of Lincoln back in 1988, which he didn't do in the now much more conservative West Virginia, and it's been only about a decade since a Republican was able to win a Senate election in the state (in that case, Peter Fitzgerald). Illinois might not have been a "swing state," per se, but it certainly was competetive.

Now, though, not so much. In last year's gubernatorial race, to take one example, Republican state Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka was supposed to give incumbent Democrat Rod Blagojevich, who had come under serious ethics heat, a real run for his money but ended up garnering just 40 percent of the vote. 2004 GOP Senate nominee Alan Keyes performed even more poorly -- much more so, in fact -- pulling in a mere 27 percent of the vote. Perhaps those were just anomolies, you say? Perhaps not. Take a look at the latest Glengariff Group poll of Illinois adults taken back in the middle of May that shows the man who could potentially be the strongest Republican candidate in the state, former Governor Jim Edgar, trailing -- and trailing badly -- against Democratic Senator Dick Durbin.

The poll also posed a hypothetical U.S. Senate race between Durbin and former Gov. Jim Edgar, yielding a Durbin advantage of 53-32 percent. Edgar is not expected to run for that or any other office.

More numbers from the poll:

The poll of 600 people taken May 15-18 by Chicago-based Glengariff Group found U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's job-approval rating at 73.2 percent while U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin enjoyed a 62.2 overall job approval.

The Republican Party does not need Illinois in order to win the White House. We've seen as much in the last two presidential elections. But if the GOP has any hope of retaking the Senate this cycle, they're going to have to find some Democratic seats to challenge. And that of the Senate Majority Whip, a position that requires a high level of partisanship that does not always play well back home (even in states that trend towards the party of the Senator), should be a natural target for Republicans.

This poll indicates that such a challenge -- if not a competitive one, then at least one that would force Durbin to work for his reelection, limiting his ability to campaign and raise money elsewhere -- just isn't going to happen. If one of the best possible choices for the GOP, a relatively popular former Governor, can't do better than trail Durbin by 20 points, it's hard to imagine a less popular, less well known and potentially less well funded candidate doing so.

And while these numbers might not indicate the end of the Illinois GOP -- after all, they do still hold nine of the state's 19 congressional seats -- at the same time they don't do much to instill confidence in the viability of the party in the state, either.



Display:


Re: More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP (none / 0)

Edgar has not been on the ballot since 1994 during the 94 GOP revolution since then Illinios has become a reliable blue state. Durbin is a fairly popular political figure in Illinios. He won't have the star power as Obama.


by nkpolitics on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 08:12:49 PM EST

73% approval (3.00 / 1)

in a state that is not unbeleivably pro-democratic, Kerry got 55%, does anyone still debate seriously who the best general election candidate would be.


Obama! because 51% isn't enough!
by nevadadem on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 08:25:37 PM EST

Re: More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP (none / 0)

Well, the GOP has been shooting itself in the foot regularly: Jack Ryan, Alan Keyes, George Ryan's troubles.

And, believe me, the state's Dem. governor isn't popular. The GOP just somehow managed to find someone who was even less appealing to run against him last year.

But taking advantage of lucky breaks is part of the secret to success.

Two future lucky breaks I'd love to see: Hastert and LaHood retirements.


by Bush Bites on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 09:54:39 PM EST

Re: More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP (none / 0)

The IL-GOP does have 9 seats, but that's tenuous at best.

Dan Seals is making Mark Kirk sweat again (assuming he gets out of the primary, although the other Dem is legit too), and given how the suburban counties are shifting, the GOP's hold on Roskam and Biggert's seats are tenuous at best. Melissa Bean shows that once we get a foothold, we can win consistently in the collar counties.

Central/downstate Illinois is losing population, so with the next round of redistricting, one of the downstate seats (most likely) is gone, removing one of Shimkus, Johnson, LaHood, Hastert, Manzullo and Weller.

Of course, that's assuming Weller survives/Hastert doesn't retire/LaHood doesn't become President of Bradley...

The IL-GOP is pretty much done, with no statewide offices left and their strongholds weakening or losing population.


by jeff06dem on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:15:18 PM EST

Re: More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP (none / 0)

Oh, man, I'd love to see Roskam get knocked off. I hate that creep.


by Bush Bites on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 12:39:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More Embarrassment for Illinois GOP (none / 0)

You're right, Illinois is likely to lose a Congressional seat because the downstate population is shrinking. Luckily for us, it seems that Democrats will have the trifecta and can therefore consolidate two Republican seats into one.
Weller's seat will not be eliminated though. The population base for his district (which I have lived in for 17 years) is Will County, and Will County is one of the fastest growing counties in the country. So the district will shrink geographically (other population centers may be cut out and added to a different seat) but Will County is certainly not shrinking.
by AC4508 on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 12:49:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

He may be popular (3.00 / 1)

but that is no immunity from sometimes being a putz.  Why did Durbin go along with the capitulation to the Repugs on the Iraq supplemental.  Costs him nothing to make a stand.
But, give in the Repugs and he looks like jackass.

But, then, even Obama has had days when he is putz.  Recall his confirmation vote for Condi Rice as Secretary of State.


by pascal1947 on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:42:44 PM EST

More embarrassing: Dems supporting coal to liquids (none / 0)

The only thing more embarrassing than the choices IL Republicans put forward are the positions taken by IL Democrats on clean energy and global warming policy.  
Both Democratic Governor Blagojevich and Senator Obama support subsidies for turning coal into liquid fuel--a technology refined in apartheid South Africa.  Turning coal into liquid, and using that coal releases up to double--DOUBLE--the amount of CO2 emitted during the process of liquifying and using the resulting fuel, at a time when the policymakers are seriously considering an 80% reduction in global warming pollution by 2050, is ludicrous.

What kind of visionary leader would strap their state with technology that puts their economy behind the curve in developing 21st century clean energy and curbing global warming, and in a carbon constrained economy, handicaps their state economy by creating brand new carbon intensive energy infrastructure?  Unless Illinois is hoping for public subsidy for that, too.


by mnprogressive on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 11:44:19 PM EST

Take a look at he diary on (none / 0)

the top of the recommended list if you want to know about Obama's position on clean coal.


The history of the left is a history of purists betraying the progressive movement so that they can feel good about their righteous selves.
by Populism2008 on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 04:00:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.