This is very significant. Wynn launched his campaign for reelection to Maryland's fourth district, bringing Fox News contributor Harold Ford to headline the announcement. Here's what Ford said:
Ford, meanwhile, offered scathing criticism of how President Bush has managed the war, but specifically noted "I don't think we can leave Iraq right away." Ford went on to say, "As much as didn't do it right, we have to get it right because there are people over there who want to do us harm."
And Wynn loved it.
In an interview, Wynn called Ford "a tremendous young talent in our party." Wynn said he believed Ford made it clear he wants the United States out of Iraq, but "he also made it very clear that we need to think beyond cliches. My race is not going to be a bunch of cliches...We're going to talk about issues, substance and policy. We're going to try to bring some depth to how we deal with the 21st century."
Wynn is pretending to change his stripes, and a lot of progressives are falling for it. Wynn is one of the key backers of the removal of the estate tax, and he's a genuine corporate corrupt Democrat. I'll have a lot more on this soon, but I would encourage you, if you think he's changed, to take a look through his FEC filings this year.
Walmart, AT&T, Bellsouth, Firstenergy, T-Mobile, Pfizer, Edison Electric, Progress Energy, Sallie Mae, the US Chamber of Commerce.
The US Chamber of Commerce! This is the group that is protesting dictionary-makers about the word 'McJob', trying to get them to change the word to "reflect a job that is stimulating, rewarding ... and offers skills that last a lifetime."
I wonder, does Al Wynn support Walmart's hiring practices? Does he support changing the definition of a McJob? Does he believe in global warming? Does he believe in anything that he isn't paid to believe in?
This is going to be a very different race from 2006 in a lot of ways, mostly because Donna is a legitimate candidate and Wynn is going to run a race not based on inevitability. I wonder if he's going to violate FEC rules this time, as he often does. Or maybe his staffers are going to beat up Edwards volunteers, or perhaps he'll brag about stealing the election in a committee hearing. Who knows? The question around this race, though, is always going to be 'follow the money'.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 21 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.