Newt: End Democracy as We Know It

I caught a video of Newt Gingrich on Meet the Press today explaining how he would win the war in Iraq. The third item in Newt's 6 point plan was particularly eye catching.

"Encourage the development of a military tribunal system to lock people up the way Abraham Lincoln would have done it."

When Gingrich mentions "locking people up" through a military tribunal system, he is referring to war opponents. The key is the Lincoln reference. When conservatives like Gingrich talk about military tribunals in relation to Abraham Lincoln, they emphasize that Lincoln had the leading Copperhead, or Southern sympathizer, Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, brought before a military tribunal and convicted. For conservatives, the Vallandigham case established a decisive precedent for presidents having domestic opponents of a war arrested and brought before military courts. Former Reagan defense official Frank Gaffney argued recently in a Washington Times column that the Lincoln precedent meant that members of Congress like Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan should be subject to arrest. Obviously, the same would apply to the leadership of anti-war organizations like MoveOn.org, the proprietors of popular left-wing blogs like DailyKos and MyDD, and anti-war figures like Michael Moore as well.

For Gingrich, "locking people up" means jailing hundreds if not thousands of war opponents and silencing anybody else who might be opposed to the war. At least implicitly, Gingrich believes that "winning the war" means abrogating the free speech, free press, freedom of assembly, habeas corpus, and other due process rights for the entire American population. In other words, the effort to create democracy in Iraq would have the effect (at least temporarily) of ending democracy in the United States.



Display:


Re: Newt: End Democracy as We Know It (none / 0)

Yep, that is Newt. Not exactly a surprise. He said a few months ago that freedom of speech was so out of touch with the post 9/11 world.


by rikyrah on Mon May 21, 2007 at 08:16:51 AM EST

Re: Newt: End Democracy as We Know It (none / 0)

I saw those comments last fall as well.  But I think that Newt's upping the ante in several ways.  First, the military tribunal idea amounts to a system of martial law for suppressing domestic dissent.  Second, the military tribunal idea is part of Newt's presidential platform rather than idle speech-making like the comments on the First Amendment last fall.  Third, it seems likely that Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney would adapt the military tribunal idea much like they've advocated torture as an interrogation technique, the continuation of Guantanomo, and similar measures.  All of these things raise the distinct possibility that discontinuing American democracy will be part of Republican campaign platforms for 2008.


by Ric Caric on Mon May 21, 2007 at 09:32:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Newt: End Democracy as We Know It (none / 0)

In many ways "Democracy as we know it" has already been suspended and replaced by a form of Martial Law.  It will take years to undo the damage that the Bush administration and their accomplices in Congress have brought upon us.

Note to Obama:  The "other side" can indeed be aptly classified as "the enemy."  End of story.  


by georgep on Mon May 21, 2007 at 08:32:17 AM EST

Re: Newt: End Democracy as We Know It (none / 0)

That's true and Gingrich is demonstrating that the slippery slope is indeed slippery.  However, Gingrich seems to be ratcheting up the rhetoric of authoritarianism a great deal by calling for a general suppression of domestic dissent.  


by Ric Caric on Mon May 21, 2007 at 09:34:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.