Romney as their default nominee

In Crashing the Gate we go through, in the first chapter, the basis of the Republican coalition. You've got the lobbyist money-first con crowd; the fundamentalist theocons voting from the pews; then the quagmire neocons, and there's also the paleocons that represent the more traditional Republican Party.

Ron Paul, who ran as a libertarian in '88 for President, before coming into the Republican tent, fits the paleocon image. But for the movement conservatives that are the movers and shakers of the Bush-led Republican Party, 9-11 changed everything, including the welcome mat to guys like Ron Paul.

Rudy Giuliani, who is a neocons dream-candidate, would break apart another quarter of the Republican coalition. The prominent Republican-Christian leader James Dobson said Thursday:

"my conscience and my moral convictions" prevent him from voting for Rudy Giuliani should he win the Republican nomination...

Dobson called Giuliani an "unapologetic supporter of abortion on demand" and criticized him for signing a bill in 1997 creating domestic-partnership benefits in New York City.

He said there were other "moral concerns" with Giuliani, including that he's on his third marriage to "his mistress" from his second marriage and "appears not to have remorse for cheating on his wife."

Maybe it's true that Giuliani doesn't have a chance and is losing steam. It also says in the article that Dobson is meeting with Romney, who has been surging in the Iowa and New Hampshire polls.

Romney is a weak general election candidate, but he seems to be emerging as the only one that can please theocons. It's very difficult to gain traction within a primary against flip-flopping; as long as the final flop is in line with the orthodoxy, the rapid faithful will ultimately believe--- they have too as fundamentalists.

As I remarked in a comment earlier, the amount of flip-flopping that Romney has done, and the furtherance of it into the general as he would have to move back to the middle, would provide so much ammunition to put him on the defensive, that we would have a field day with him over and over every day.

I think Romney would have been formidable in a pre-internet campaign, but that we would tear him apart in a general election with his slimy used car salesman, say anything history.



Display:


Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

I don't think Romney will win the nomination, but he can win NH and MI though and can cause Giuliani to lose by siphening off critical votes in NH and IA. I think McCain will become the eventual nominee.


by olawakandi on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:26:34 AM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I agree.  This is exactly how it will play out.
McCain is the true default candidate.  He will be '08's "comeback kid".
by NYFM on Fri May 18, 2007 at 02:40:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I do not see Romney as going anywhere. Most of the Anybody But Rudy/McCain crowd wants Thompson to get in. Romney has no honesty, consistency or credibility whatsoever.

Now that McCain has shotgunned himself in the face on immigration, I really have no clue as to who will win the GOP nod.


by jforshaw on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:30:44 AM EST

Most of all Repugs want to win (none / 0)

and if Romney looks strong they will vote for him.

We should be like the Republicans and vote for our strongest candidate which is empathetically not Hillary Clinton.


The history of the left is a history of purists betraying the progressive movement so that they can feel good about their righteous selves.
by Populism2008 on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:38:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Most of all Repugs want to win (none / 0)

If they want to mirror the process that gave us the Kerry nomination, then I say we let them play "guess who appeals to the left."  They'll get burned just as badly as we did.


"You say the world has lost it's love I say embrace what it's made of" -Dar Williams
by Valatan on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:12:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Most of all Repugs want to win (none / 0)

Problem is Kerry did not appeal to moderates. It's not the concept of electability that is wrong, it is  that Dems back then still thought that "experience" makes you electable. It's all about likeability.


The history of the left is a history of purists betraying the progressive movement so that they can feel good about their righteous selves.
by Populism2008 on Sat May 19, 2007 at 08:05:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I hope that you are right (none / 0)

But if Romney uses it as a "look, I have some liberal convictions too" perhaps it won't be as damning.

He is damn telegenic which matters in these days. So is Obama, who I think would be our strongest candidate against either Romney or Guiliani. Edwards would be strong too. The relative "inexperience" of Obama and Edwards would not matter against Romney.


The history of the left is a history of purists betraying the progressive movement so that they can feel good about their righteous selves.
by Populism2008 on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:36:39 AM EST

Re: I hope that you are right (none / 0)

What about Rotten Rudy? He was the mayor of a city.

I hope Paul gets in for the Libertairians and some crazy like Alan Kyes jumps for the Constitution Party our Pat Buchanan and Tom Tracedaro, that would be a dream ticket.

But Bloomberg wakes up and doesn't run, but Chucky Hagel stills wants to be president and he runs. And of coarse rotten rudy gets the nomination.

Libertarian Party Ron Paul 2%
Constitution Party Alan Kyes 6%
Chuck-e Cheese Hagel Party Chuck Hagel 5%
No Surrender Party John McCain/Joe Lieberman 8%
Republican Party Rotten Rudy 30%
Green Party Ralph Nader 1%
Democratic Party Barack Obama/John Edwards 48%

If only.


"Live your beliefs and you can turn the world around." --Thoreau
by Populista on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:42:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hope that you are right (none / 0)

You joke, but I'm not sure why this isn't mentioned more often. Assuming this person would get on the ballot in a large number of states, specifically swing states, I wonder why more people aren't discussing the possibility of a third party run from the right if someone like Rudy ends up being the nominee. I'm not talking about Perot like numbers, mind you, but considering the small margins from the last two elections, a far right-wing candidate who takes, say, 3% in a few swing states could help us enormously.


by bjaklitsch on Wed May 30, 2007 at 11:14:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Romney is a nonstarter to folks in the south(where I live). As must disrespect as we have for Republicans, they do read polls(no matter what they say)and Romney gets his hat handed to him by all Dem challengers. We need to plan on facing McCain or Guiliani and plan accordingly.

OT: Please email this to all of your friends in the military. They must now(if they don't already) that BushCo. won't support them as Vets or active duty!

Could we get an thread on this disgusting display by the White House?

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/mi litary_payhike_whitehouse_070516/


by ND1979 on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:40:38 AM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Off topic but right on.  The Bushies have the money for their goof ball contractors but not for the actual military.  Shame!


by David Kowalski on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:58:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Romney's Polls May Not Matter (none / 0)

I am sure that you are right about Romney and the south.  The south will be a challenge for him.

I am not sure if national polls about the general election properly reflect Romney's real strength.  His name recognition is too low.

As Romney's name recognition increases, his poll numbers will become more accurate.


by Hellmut on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:56:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I am in the South. I would not it rule out that Romney can pull it off here. In Mississippi some months ago he drew one of the largest crowds at a fundraiser of any GOP candidate (big money people, conservative).


BlueSunbelt.Com Netroots for the Sunbelt states robwire.com My personal blog
by robliberal on Fri May 18, 2007 at 12:25:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 2)

I think the big under-discussed story about the GOP race is McCain recovery, which began with his Iraq speech and his little song about Iran. His numbers have bounced back, the media still love him, and Rudy and Romney are looking increasingly ridiculous. I worry about this, because McCain might--might--have the the political wisdom to declare Iraq a lost cause in the fall and "lead" the U.S to withdraw, thus burnishing his "honest man" cred and becoming a tough general election candidate. He's still the guy to beat.


by david mizner on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:23:42 AM EST

agreed (none / 0)

MCcain can trot out a 'more in sorrow than anger' routine on Iraq, admit he was 'wrong' (sort of) and have the press drop to their knees immediately.  Can anyone imagine the media's response to criticism of St. McCain by, God forbid, a Breck Girl, black man, or (shudder) an ACTUAL WOMAN?


by Weefer on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:50:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 2)

His Mormonism will get him.  I grew as a Southern Baptist, and I can tell you that the Evangelicals despise Mormonism.  I cannot describe the depth of distaste that they have for the religion that they openly refer to as a cult.  There are seminars in the Southern Baptist Church about how to combat Mormonism.

Romney will not be able to get the Southern Baptist (and other evangelical) vote, at least not with any enthusiasm.  The church leaders will sacrifice almost anything to prevent him from being the nominee.  While I think that he has a shot (maybe the best shot of the three front-runners) I don't think he will win.  You need Evangelical support to win the nomination in the GOP, and Romney won't get it.


by nanoboy on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:32:59 AM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Don't count on it.  I know many ultra-conservative Catholics (the type that are like Mel Gibson and go tot Latin masses, sometimes outside the scope of the official Church)... they like the guy.

One of them even told me that Romney is the most "Catholic" of the candidates, because he is so "pro-family".

Remember that when you live in a fantasy world, you can mold anything to become your reality.

Thanks,

Mike


by lordmikethegreat on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:22:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

What do radical Catholics have to do with Baptists?

And I would think that the latter makes up a much larger part of the Republican base.


"You say the world has lost it's love I say embrace what it's made of" -Dar Williams
by Valatan on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:41:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

While religious fundamentalists have a great deal in common with each other, regardless of religion or denomination, each group has its own set of insanities.  There aren't many places in America where Gibsonian Catholic fundamentalists are in charge, so they have to settle for other right-wingers to vote for.  Evangelicals, especially Southern Baptists, feel a sense of entitlement due to their size.  They do control many communities, especially across the South.  They won't settle for a Mormon.  Even some of the hierarchy did, I imagine that a lot of pastors will rail against Romney from their pulpits, as the Southern Baptists are not exactly monolithic.  It's a strange organization in which there is top-down organization along with very independent churches.


by nanoboy on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:53:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I was talking about the primary election.  Now, I am very aware of the vitriol directed toward Hillary in the South.  I live in Oklahoma, after all, and I lived here in the 90's.  She is despised beyond reason.  I admit that I don't much care for her as a candidate, and I'm ambivalent about her as a senator.  Still, wow.  There is pretty much no one that the right-wing common folk hate more than her.

I do have an aunt who votes R every time and is driven by one issue-- abortion.  She has told my mother that she couldn't vote for Romney or Giulliani in a general election.  Could she hold her nose?  For Giulliani, no, absolutely not.  For Romney, it's possible but doubtful.


by nanoboy on Fri May 18, 2007 at 01:35:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Of course, this is another part of the discussion that few seem to mention: why are we worrying so much about people who hate Sen. Clinton so passionately? It's not as if they are going to vote for any Democrat. Are their numbers so large and their hatred so strong that even in states where we might have a shot, say Florida and Virginia, they'd make it easy for the Republican nominee?


by bjaklitsch on Wed May 30, 2007 at 11:18:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

I fear Romney more than any other of the Republicans. I do hope all who say he can't possibly win the presidency are right.


by Coral on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:39:16 AM EST

It'll be Big Fred (3.00 / 3)

This is all a sideshow.  As much as I would like to see Romney on the ballot in '08, Fred Thompson can skate to this nomination with ease.  And we'd better be ready, because his Reagan's corpse, Southern-fried bullshit is custom-made for the press and too many voters in this country.


by Weefer on Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:47:10 AM EST

Re: It'll be Big Fred (none / 0)

I have a feeling you're right.  I guess the other X-factor is who the bush team is pushing for behind the scenes.  


"You say the world has lost it's love I say embrace what it's made of" -Dar Williams
by Valatan on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:16:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It'll be Big Fred (none / 0)

This too is where I see the wind blowing.  If the current top three continue to tank, Thompson can sweep in at the end, probably without saying much of anything, and the cult of personality-loving repugs will line up to vote for him.  Thompson will be tough to beat in the general and would probably trounce Hillary.

The only wildcard now is the possible third party candidate should the GOP nominee be too pro-choice or pro-immigration.


by Rickyspub on Fri May 18, 2007 at 04:26:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

I sense its Fred Thompson if he runs. The problem is can we get critical media coverage of their major flaws: Rudy's infidelities, Romney's flip-flops, McCain's lack of principle etc. So far, the MSM only covers alleged Democrats' flaws, ex. Gore the liar, Kerry the elitist, & so on.

Southern baptists may dislike Romney's Mormonism but they'll vote for a Repub over any Democrat. The only exception I see is Edwards, who because of his southern background & speaking style would siphon off Southern votes & baptist votes. Part of his appeal is his help the working class message. Past polls have shown him doing this with baptists who will vote on the basis of an economic message.


by carter1 on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:09:55 AM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Romney is not as weak as you think.  You are correct that he is the default candidate.  He has a partnership with all the major right-wing media folk--they all endorse him form Coulter, to Drudge, to Michael Medved, etc.  In fact, McCain's "Bomb, Bomb, Iran" clip was apparently leaked to Drudge by Romney's campaign.  The right wing media are all on board with him.  He's the money candidate.  I'm sure that financial "compensation", either direct or indirect, has helped cement his status with the republican elite.

He's also not as weak of a candidate as you think.  He is a very slick and smooth salesman.  He exudes  a "soothing" aura of masculinity, confidence, and competence.    He also has the money and the backing of corporate America.  He can afford a strong campaign infrastructure, has the media on his side, and doesn't make big mistakes.

Be careful who you wish for!

Thanks,

Mike


by lordmikethegreat on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:19:36 AM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I disagree that he "He exudes  a "soothing" aura of masculinity".  I find his mannerisms somewhat effeminate.


"And so in the place of the palace of privilege, we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and charity."-FDR
by jallen on Fri May 18, 2007 at 11:22:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

I'm surprised the theocons will accept a Mormon.  A lot of fundies don't even accept Mormons as Christian.  Moreover, there's fierce competition in the Rocky Mountain states, at least, between the Mormons and the fundies for warm bodies -- fannies in the pews, as George Steinbrenner might say.

Every time I think about the Mormons I'm reminded of one of the early Star Trek movies -- the one where the gang time-travels to 1980s San Fransicso to save the whales -- where Kirk, trying to explain Spock's odd behavior, says, "Don't mind him.  He fried his brains on LDS."


by drlimerick on Fri May 18, 2007 at 12:03:27 PM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 2)

Just remember that used car salesmen do, in fact, tend to sell a lot of used cars.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri May 18, 2007 at 12:33:20 PM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

all 3 major candidates have serious flaws for Republican voters, mcCain had the least of them until yesterday's immigration bill, Fred Thompson has the nomination on a silver platter.


Obama! because 51% isn't enough!
by nevadadem on Fri May 18, 2007 at 12:45:59 PM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (3.00 / 1)

See also:

Romney Tops YouTube Video Rankings
http://hammer2006.blogspot.com/2007/05/e xclusive-top-presidential-candidate.html


Politics 2.0 - What's now and what's next!
by PoliticsTwoPointZero on Fri May 18, 2007 at 01:41:43 PM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

(1) Romney is no Bill Clinton He is not smooth, just stiff.
(2) Of course the GOP candidate will win the south. Romney will not win the south in the primary. Many reasons already given. Mormonism being the biggest. Glibness would be number 2.
(3) John McCain is not recovering in the polls. His #'s ares stuck it is just that Rudy is coming down.
(4) True. Romney is the money/big business guy.
(5) Did I mention he is a mormon from New England wooing a southern-based party?
by ND1979 on Fri May 18, 2007 at 01:47:36 PM EST

Re: Romney as their default nominee (none / 0)

Romney? Doesn't he want two Guantanamos?

And doesn't he and Guiliani both want to use torture?

Southern Baptists and other fundamentalist Christian rightists will suspect that Romney would use torture on them, or at least be a threat to their belief system.

Mel Gibson Catholics won't mind water-boarding. That was a technique the Church used on heretics.


by Hempy on Fri May 18, 2007 at 09:42:13 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.