the power of the long tail blog

In my work organizing Blogs United I've read and followed blogs large and small.

If there is one kind of blog or blogging that I think gets short shrift in the current progressive blogosphere it would be what I'm going to call the "long tail blog."

What is a long tail blog and why should you care about them and perhaps consider starting one of your own?

Read more below...

Chris Anderson's long tail is a hot concept that, has nevertheless, been underutilized by progressive blogs.  

Without going into needless detail, the idea of the long tail as applied to bloggers has a simple pragmatic application. There are two main blocs of readers for our writing, both being, believe it or not, effectively roughly equal in size:

a) those who read our posts immediately and come to us directly
b) those who find our posts through searches

The two audiences are vastly different. The first audience reads our writing because they come to our blogs frequently and seek that writing out. These readers are drawn from a finite, but expandable, pool. The second group, the ones coming through searches, come to our writing on the blogs because they are seeking out information that we've written about. These folks are drawn from a much wider pool of potential readers. These readers don't all arrive at once, but rather, slowly, over time through search engines like google or yahoo.

That distinction is critical.

I would argue that the vast majority of writing on progressive blogs is wholly oriented towards the first group of readers, let's call them "the choir."

You can tell this because posts in the progressive blogosphere tend to be:

  1. not google friendly
  2. titled for an insider audience
  3. unapologetically partisan
  4. written for the politics of the moment
  5. lacking in neutral "authority and trust-building" linkage
  6. written assuming an insider's point of view

That just tends to be the way things are on the blogs: we "short tail" bloggers write for "the choir" and, when you get down to it, why wouldn't we? Writing for the largest immediate audience, ie. the head of the distribution curve, is a natural thing to do. Of course, that creates the current blogosphere-wide landscape that is not very user friendly to those seekers on the long tail who come to us more for our information than our immediate political impact.

We can call the folks in the long tail: "the seekers."

One of the things that I've noticed in covering local and regional blogs is that these local bloggers have to, of necessity, focus their writing more on "the seekers."

Local and regional bloggers realize that the pool of potential readers in "the choir" (ie. readers who want to read about local politics every day) is relatively small when compared to the pool of people in "the seekers" who might be interested, sometime in the next few months, to read about local politics from time to time.

Because of this, local bloggers have to pay much closer attention to the long tail...and, in effect, are more akin to slow motion "citizen journalists" or "journalist activists" than the "citizen pundits" who are their "short tail" brethren.

Long tail bloggers:

  1. create google-friendly posts
  2. title their posts in an informative manner
  3. write with some sense of partisan balance
  4. write for the politics of the long haul
  5. make frequent use of "authority and trust-building" links
  6. write assuming an outsider's point of view to politics

A long tail blog need not be local or regional. In fact, all blogs have an audience made up both of "seekers" and "choir". All blogs need both, in fact, since comments, the interactive and sticky aspect of a blog, are per force a phenomenon of the first part of the distribution curve of readers, the choir.

The key thing a "long tail" blog does, however, is to keep its content friendly to "the seekers" by focusing on two factors:

1. making it as easy as possible to find the blog's content through searches (ie. SEO)
2. structuring the content itself for the "search-oriented" audience

In effect, the long tail blog is an elaboration on the concept that Chris Bowers enunciated with his push for "google bombing" last fall: creating easy-to-find, information-rich posts oriented towards seekers. The critical difference is that "long tail blogging" describes a year-round activity. I am convinced that long tail blogging represents a way of writing and a way of blogging that is not just different, but has profound implications for the effectiveness and reach of the progressive blogosphere.

Now, I can imagine there are all sorts of crucial distinctions and hybrids that we could talk about here. (ie. are community blogs, by their nature, short tail? don't most blogs mix both styles and do both? etc. etc.) But as a long-time veteran of writing for large, partisan community-blogs, I would say that, once you get your head around it, the concept of writing with a long tail audience in mind is absolutely revolutionary. In some ways, for all its strengths, the current blogosphere's relentless focus on the traffic at the head of the distribution curve has been one of its greatest blindnesses and weak spots. We are simply too much about "the choir" and, given a second's thought, it's obvious how that fact has shaped our movement to this day.

Last fall I proselytized for any and every one in the netroots to start or join a local or regional blog. The thought behind this move was my realization that local "seekers" following congressional races simply do not find these large community hives where tens of thousands of us blog day in and day out to be friendly or accesible sources of information.

We needed to go local.

The answer, however, was not so simple as "blogging the way we always did" but on an independent URL covering local politics for a tiny audience. In fact, the counterintuitive aspects of that notion were probably a disincentive for most diarists to ever break off and found or join a local blog. Why would anyone ever want to leave the short tail audience? Why not write about local politics FOR the massive and immediate audience of a large blog?

Well, because when you do that you tend to miss pretty much the entire audience of seekers, you miss the long tail.

What I'm saying now is that bloggers who launch new blogs need to incorporate the power of the long tail audience, need to see the steady accumulation of "seeker" readers as central to their approach. Even bloggers in the current crop of large traffic-oriented blogs would do well to think more about the long tail audience of seekers, to see them as potential readers and understand their needs.

I am convinced that, just as "local and regional" blogs were the hot development last election season that "long tail blogs" covering all sorts of topics, and including a ton of local and regional blogs, will be the hot development this election cycle.

Long tail blogging is nothing new, but the concept behind it is the fuel that fires much of our rhetoric; we all want to reach out to that vast audience of readers hungry for the facts.

::
::

Please share this! Creative Commons, Paul Delehanty, 2007

Note: I hope you found this essay useful. If you are a local or regional or long tail blogger interested in joining Blogs United and discussing the nitty gritty of HOW you can actually do the above, or just want to drop me a line with a question: email me at kidoaklandactivism@comcast.net



Display:


brilliant (3.00 / 1)

I heard an interview with Chris Anderson a while back, and well, there is a lot of truth in his book.  You see the results on the internet particularly well, with itunes and the like.

i actually spoke to a friend yesterday who commented that calitics assumed an insider knowledge. I was kind of suprised by that, but going back I think it's true. For my part, I'll do my best to provide background as much as possible. Oh, and I'll try to optimize for searching too.


Check out Calitics, the progressive Community blog for California.
by utbrian on Thu May 17, 2007 at 05:04:55 PM EST

Re: brilliant (3.00 / 1)

It totally does. When I first started reading calitics, I had no clue who anyone was talking about.  If you stick with it, you learn, but it's insider for sure.  That said, it kinda has to be.  There's only so mcuch to say about Arnold, Pelosi, Boxer and Feinstein that would be relevant and not found at dailykos anyways.


by Lucas O'Connor on Thu May 17, 2007 at 05:49:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

I think you're once again doing a great job of stating what seems obvious, but only after someone actually says it.

That said, there's a lot more that needs to go along with this sort of analysis I think.  For example, if I'm generic semi-casual diary writer at MyDD and I want to dive into local blogging, what do I know about google-friendly titles and SEO? Probably not a lot. So if I'm told it's a prerequisite to doing a decent job, it sounds a helluva lot mroe manageable to just keep writing a diary every week when the mood strikes than researching the ins and outs of how to maximize multiple posts a day for search engine searches.

I don't mean this to be criticism of this post, which I think is excellent.  But it might also be good, if you haven't already, to cobble together a crib sheet for people that would help them do what you're suggesting.


by Lucas O'Connor on Thu May 17, 2007 at 05:15:52 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

I think this is one of the reasons I believe the power of the progressive blog will lie in small community blogging efforts rather than the big national blogs, or individual person blogs. Okay, I'm prejudiced because I run one of those community blogs - http://www.uppitywis.org.

But this works fairly well for all of us.  It is quite search engine friendly, and I get to handle all of the nasty technical stuff - that's what I do - while the rest of the bloggers on the site just get to write.  And we clearly have some long-tail characteristics - almost 50% of our traffic comes from search engines, and a lot of it is for articles that are quite old.  I think we're way past the model where everyone need his own URL - it makes it much easier to do SEO, etc. when you can aggregate a number of people into one spot.


Steve Hanson Uppity Wisconsin - http://www.uppitywis.org
by shanson on Thu May 17, 2007 at 05:50:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (none / 0)

I certainly think it works and it's a good idea to use this model.  I just think that, along with promoting such a plan, it is important to explain HOW to do it.


by Lucas O'Connor on Thu May 17, 2007 at 06:41:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Much food for thought (3.00 / 1)

For all the screaming pie-fights one sees over meta at - some places I could mention! - this is something I can't remember seeing get coverage.

My sense would be that not only would the style you suggest be more conducive to drawing in - not to mention, keeping - non-choirmembers, but would also increase the value (and the information to noise ratio) of blogs for the rest of us.

Beyond that, there are problems with trying to pitch the content at a lay audience: on the one hand, my sense is that the technical knowledge of a good part of the choir is, on average, not stellar (in matters of legislative process, that is, the only area I can really judge); on the other hand, discussing a technical subject without assuming a lot of prior knowledge becomes hideously unwieldy - not to mention tedious.

Worst of all, it interrupts the flow of thought!

It's a problem which is kind of analogous to that with news, that it reports events, but not states. So, missing white girls, yes; public health, no.

Part of the trouble is that, on a blog like this, the only signs of interest one gets in diaries are recommendations and comments.

And, if the reader's problem is that he doesn't really understand what in Sam Hill you're talking about, he's unlikely to offer either!


by skeptic06 on Thu May 17, 2007 at 05:55:11 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (none / 0)

I'd be against a less partisan style.


"And so in the place of the palace of privilege, we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and charity."-FDR
by jallen on Thu May 17, 2007 at 06:10:44 PM EST

Whether you're a long-tailer or not (3.00 / 1)

(and I am not), that first point, creating Google-friendly posts, is absolutely key, especially if, like me, you're a blogger focused on one or two key races.

How to get more people to come to read what you say about a race?  My two cents:

1) Start early
2) Dominate the search results


Wonder if Sununu's fired now.
by Dean Barker on Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:05:50 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

You've really got your finger on something very important here. More than half the folks who come to my site do so through search engines and I've been fortunate to have Google consider me a newspaper, so I get news searches.

I tend to publish longer articles on the California Progress Report http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/ that are more journalistic but nevertheless usually with a point of view.  My niche is California state public policy and politics.

I draw from a variety of sources and have different people sending me articles or that I reach out for.  I am posting these myself and editing for spelling mistakes, pretty much insisting on a headshot of the author, a real name for a byline, and a bio statement so that it is personal and not anonymous.

I take care in the headline I use and think of search terms and how readers will find it.

I can't say I'm consistent in all of this and there's a schizophrenia between posting the regular crowd of Sacramento (our state capitol) and other insiders who read the site and the general public.  So some articles are written to persuade the average person and some are wonkish, etc. Some are designed consciously or not to motivate the base and others to persuade voters on candidates and ballot measures. A blend of red meat and NPR like stuff.

So far, I've left all the articles on the site since I started it 14 months ago open for comment and in the archive of the site.  Folks read stuff posted a year ago.  So, it kind of serves as a reference.

And I've tried to put some other features, a daily set of headlines for news and opinion to click on, a directory that needs a lot of work, etc., so it is more like a web page rather than a blog.

And I work with Brian and my many friends at Calitics, which is more of a community site where folks post their own stuff.  We overlap but also have different audiences and there can be a synergy at times.  California is so large and undercovered.

Still learning and trying to figure this one out.


by Frank Russo on Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:11:44 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

So how do you become Google friendly?


Rochester Turning: Turning the tide Upstate.
by sayhar on Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:31:36 PM EST

How to become Google friendly (3.00 / 2)

the first thing to understand is Page Rank.

The Wikipedia entry for it is overly technical.  Try following some of the links in this google search to get a simpler picture.

One of the problems with learning about Search Engine Optimization (ie. becoming "google friendly") is that almost everyone writing about in online is trying to hustle money off their article by larding the info page with adsense ads that intrude on the text.

So let me try to break it down.

In the very simplest terms.  Google page rank gives a number between 1 and 10 to your website.  The more incoming links you have from sites with high google page rank, the higher YOUR page rank will be. And the higher your page rank, the better position you start from when google considers your web site for inclusion in the top search results.

But page rank is not everything.

Search engines take factors like: keywords, metatext, titles, posting history and your page rank into account to create the order of search results you see for a given search.

One fairly easy way, at this point in time, to create a google friendly web-site is to create a blogspot blog on a topic. (Google owns Blogger, and hence, most people think Google favors blogs hosted on blogspot.)

A blogger blog that has fair number of incoming links from blogs with decent page rank is pretty much set up to generated good search results if you:

a) title your piece well (in this case, Blogger automatically takes care of the title field, ie. the field that tells the search bots what your piece is about, for you with every post...a great advantage)
b) use your title keywords in the lead paragraph without overdoing it.

example: A blogspot blog with Page Rank of 5, writing about a politician named "Marty Croft" and "income tax evasion" would be google friendly like this:

Title: Marty Croft embroiled in Income Tax Evasion scandal.

First Paragraph: Assemblyman Marty Croft, R, Pawtucket can deny that he is being investigated for income tax evasion all he wants, but the country prosector tells no lies.

Of course, all of this is for naught if your blog is called:  "one old fart's coffee musings" or some such title.

No one will click on that search result.

So: blog name. blog url.  using a good hosting service (blogger or something with good seo). getting incoming links from blogs with good page rank. story titles and good first paragraphs are all ways to be "google friendly."


k/o: politics and local blogs
by kid oakland on Thu May 17, 2007 at 09:32:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How to become Google friendly (none / 0)

Good stuff.  Thanks bunches.  I'm sure glad I picked blogger, especially after almost paying for third party blogging software.  (Typepad)


Please visit Cotton Mouth to support Mississippi progressives.
by cottonmouthblog on Sat May 19, 2007 at 01:28:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

The short-hand version:

1) have fresh content with keywords that people are searching for.

(a) Update your site daily. Feed google daily. Use lots of tags--that'll create sub-pages for google to search as well. (It'll effectively increase the size of your site).

(b) If you are the only person writing about local topics, when someone searches for that (like a local person, place, or company), you'll get that traffic.

2) links, links, links. Google cares about how many inbound links you get. Yes, google uses a complex algorithm to weight links, but in simple terms the more sites that link to your site the better your google page rank--the higher you are on search engine results.

How do you get other sites to link to you? Linking to them doesn't hurt! Also, see #1. Focus on consistent output (daily, similar focus). That's what builds an audience. That's where you get links. Stay focused on #1, be mindful of #2, and the inbound links will take care of themselves.


by WVaBlue on Fri May 18, 2007 at 08:20:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

Interesting and true. At Corrente, we're a B or C list blog, so we're not at the peak, like Kos or Atrios, but with a Technorati rank of 4000 or so, we're not part of the "long tail," I would say, but rather on the "shoulder." (Readership follows a power law, and the drop off from the peak blogs to the tail is a steep, and very hard to climb, curve, not a straight drop off).

That said, we are a hybrid of the listed characteristics:

  1.  We are Google-friendly because Drupal (the CMS we use) creates very SEO-friendly URLs)

  2. Titles are long and informative (at least the ones we wish to propagate

  3. We're balanced in the sense that Progressive Democrat is as far right as we go

  4. We definitely write for the long haul (though we always try to see the big picture in today's story; we got warrantless surveillance right, for example, very early on)

5. We make very heavy use of "authority and trust-building" links, and do original research and interviews

6. We definitely assume an outsider's point of view -- we are "peasants with pitchforks"

We are, however, not "local" in at least three ways:

1. We have contributors from LA, Maine, Philly, Texas, Tennessee, Chicago;

2. We also cover politics more broadly conceived -- food, for example, as well, where what is local is to be encouraged ("slow food") but the perspective that encourages the local may not be local;

3. We are also into developing "micro-rhetoric" -- honing the words and phrases used by our cohorts. Such language is not local, a dialect, but, really, a weapon for all and any to use....


by lambert on Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:34:51 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

LeftInAlabama is a very new community blog, but I've noticed that we get quite a bit of traffic through searches.  We've been trying to use titles that actually describe the post, but didn't know how to be "search engine friendly" other than that.

I have found that the audience we want to reach is not blog savvy at all.  This afternoon I helped a friend log on -- she was confused about her userid and confided that she had never done anything more than read a blog, and that rarely.  This woman is well educated, at the peak of her career and very smart, but she has never thought of leaving a comment or writing a diary.  She's excited about the idea now, though.  

Long-tailed blogs will want to take special care to be user friendly, even if the users are not very blog friendly.  Based on questions I have had, it needs to be very simple to create an account, links need to really stand out and maybe you need some simple instructions where newbies can find them.  Things like "click on Discuss to see the rest of this diary"  and "click Post a Comment if you want to respond to this."  If the name of the game is to bring in people who weren't connected before, we need to remember what it was like when we first visited a blog.


Blogging for Alabama at LeftInAlabama
by Mooncat on Thu May 17, 2007 at 10:46:09 PM EST

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (none / 0)

Great point. We've been meaning to put together a "newbie" guide, but haven't gotten around to it yet. Have you by chance done that? [Or seen a good one to model?]


by WVaBlue on Fri May 18, 2007 at 08:24:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the politics of the long tail blog (3.00 / 1)

We have no newbie guide -- or oldie guide either for that matter.  I do have a collection of links that had useful information at the other end and I would be willing to contribute to such a guide.  My technical knowledge is about zilch, just so you know.


Blogging for Alabama at LeftInAlabama
by Mooncat on Sat May 19, 2007 at 11:27:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the power of the long tail blog (none / 0)

This essay has been useful.  As we build our blog to help the state of Mississippi and Democrats we are looking for any and all help we can get.  Thanks.


Please visit Cotton Mouth to support Mississippi progressives.
by cottonmouthblog on Sat May 19, 2007 at 01:15:37 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.