Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play

It looks like there's yet another Republican Congressman intent on adding his name to the list of those implicated in the Jack Abramoff scandal and the general GOP culture of corruption. The St. Petersburg Times' Anita Kumar has the story (h/t JMM).

The FBI has asked U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney for information about his dealings with Jack Abramoff as part of its ongoing investigation into the lobbyist convicted of defrauding clients.

FBI agent Kevin Luebke refused to say whether Feeney, a Republican from the Orlando area, is under federal investigation.

Federal agents also have asked the St. Petersburg Times for an email sent to the newspaper by Feeney's office describing a golfing trip the congressman took with Abramoff to Scotland in 2003.

[...]

Feeney is one of three House members who accompanied Abramoff to Scotland on trips that included rounds of golf at the legendary Royal & Ancient Golf Club at St. Andrews.

The others are: former Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, who is serving prison time for corruption, and former House Republican leader Tom DeLay, indicted in Texas for alleged improper fundraising, is under investigation.

[...]

Feeney, 48, who spent a decade in the Florida Legislature where he was speaker of the House, has paid $23,000 in legal fees this year - more than any other expense - according to his latest campaign finance reports.

As is the case with both Rick Renzi and John Doolittle, two of the other current Republican members of Congress who have reportedly come under heat from the FBI over their improprieties, there is a genuine chance that the allegations about Feeney could jeopardize and potential reelection bid.

Although Feeney has faced at best nominal challenges from the Democrats in recent cycles (his 2006 challenger spent less than $175,000 and he literally ran unopposed in 2004), on paper his district, Florida's 24th, should be competitive. According to the Cook Partisan Voting Index, FL-24 votes only about 3 points more Republican than the nation as a whole in presidential elections, the same amount as the districts picked up last cycle by Jerry McNerney, Kirsten Gillibrand and Jason Altmire and the one almost picked up by Larry Kissell. What's more, a number of Democrats -- Harry Mitchell, Joe Donnelly, Ciro Rodriguez and Steve Kagen -- all picked up seats last fall in districts that vote a point even more Republican than Florida's 24th, and others like Nancy Boyda and Nick Lampson picked up seats in districts with even more noticeable GOP leans.

To put it another way, Feeney might be vulnerable to a challenge even in the absence of corruption allegations and a potential federal investigation. His district is marginally Republican, and although he was able to soundly defeat a well-funded Democratic challenger in 2002, 2008 isn't likely to be as good a year for Republicans as was 2002. So given that Feeney does appear to be in a difficult situation, his name among the ranks of DeLay and Ney, there is no reason that the Democrats should not make a concerted effort to take him out this cycle.

Any thoughts for challengers for this East Central Florida district, which encompasses parts of parts of Orange, Seminole and Volusia counties?



Display:


Clint Curtis Has Not Conceded -- And Won't (3.00 / 1)

He and volunteers are doing what must be done to prove election theft -- walking the district voter by voter.

He's already found more votes than the "ofishyl" results claimed and has filed a formal challenge.

http://www.clint-curtis.blogspot.com/

He's the one to support in 2008. More DC money can't help a rigged race. It's best to just leave the thorn in Feeney's side and get honest results across Florida.

--


by Dusty on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 06:33:10 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Unless you're in Europe, you're up way too early or way too late. But I agree.


- John McCain
by Bob Brigham on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 07:36:22 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Look, it was only, what, one in the morning (Pacific) when I posted that. That's not ridiculously late...


My Direct Democracy
by Jonathan Singer on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 12:01:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Clint Curtis is also a certifiable nutcase.  I think this district could easily be in play with a credible candidate who is even slightly in touch with reality.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 08:49:09 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I live in Florida am from a town that is divided by Feeney and Mica's districts.  As a Floridian, I would please advise every Democrat across the country to quit thinking they can win in Florida.  I wish it was possible, but after working on several campaigns here and seeing the metrics, Democrats usually start with a seven-point disadvantage in the polls right off the bat.  That's worse for us than Georgia.  Not to mention that the RPOF is a machine and can raise money like it's going out of style.  So my advise is to quit dreaming about picking up FL-24 regardless of the corruption allegations and spend your money in CA-04 or AZ-01 where we have shown we have a legitimate chance of winning.  


by KDJ on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 09:12:28 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

The problem with Florida is that quality candidates simply aren't out there.  There are districts - those in Orlando especially - where the R's don't have the numbers they used to have, but that doesn't matter because our bench is essentially empty.

I know lots of fine people work very hard for Karen Thurman, and she's a great person herself.  But we're just not creating candidates that can win the way other states are.

I'm not sure what the answer is - ok, yes I am, it's money for candidate development at the state rep and county commissioner level.  But even when we develop candidates at that level it's going to take years to get them into Congress and/or cabinet positions.

Quite frustrating.


by Thirsty Gator on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 09:40:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Now, I'm not going to say don't put your money on Charlie Brown in CA-04, but the district is hardly a swing district. Charlie Brown, like Jerry McNerney has no political history. I'm in favor of building a bench, but that ain't the only way to win a race.  As shown by Jerry and Charlie, one way is to just show up, try hard, and work with the grassroots.

Of course, finding a self-funder wouldn't hurt either...


Check out Calitics, the progressive Community blog for California.
by utbrian on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 10:54:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (3.00 / 1)

Didn't we just pick up two (three counting Jennings) House seats in Florida last November?


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 11:28:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Klein simply took advantage of natural trends.  South Florida is Democratic and it's congressional districts should and for the most part are Democratic.  Mahoney is renting that district.  He may survive another cycle or two, but this overwhelming Republican legislature is going to draw him out of office with redistricting.  Feeney's district has two strikes against Democrats: It's in Florida and it's mostly suburban.  Third strike is, as the several people have said, there is no bench in Florida.  There are no Democrats representing that district's area area in the state legislature.  

LBJ was right.  The South was lost for a generation, going on two.  Just give it up guys.  I saw the Davis' campaigns number GO DOWN after the Foley scandal broke.  I've seen the dirty tricks pulled in the past few elections.  I've seen the worry on Senator Nelson's face at fundraisers that somebody legitimate would challenge him because even in a Democratic year, he was going to be toast if it was not for Katherine Harris.  Quite honestly, this state is too expensive for national Democrats to keep pouring money into.  There are 10 media markets and to run commercials statewide for one week it costs $1.2 million.  Spend that money out West and I think at this point you're going to see a better return on investment.


by KDJ on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 12:59:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I'm not saying that all of Florida is in play, or that all of the South is in play.  But obviously it's possible to snag occasional districts when the stars align, so why dismiss it a year and a half in advance?  Quite frankly, even if we only grab the district for one or two terms, it costs Republicans a lot of time and money and it either runs someone THIS corrupt out of office (which is a victory for the entire country), or at least delays someone like Adam Putnam getting started in politics.

I agree about there being a lack of a bench, but I don't think that April 2007 is the time to declare seats unwinnable.  Who would've thought Montana, Virginia, KS-02, Sugarland, etc. a year and a half out?


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 01:19:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Perhaps you are right, but I think if you look at the 2006 elections objectively, you would see that Democrats in Florida drastically underperformed the rest of the Democrats in the country.  Just to use your examples: Virginia has a well-liked Democratic governor, Kansas has a well-liked Democratic governor, Montana has a well-liked Democratic governor and another Democratic senator, and Tom DeLay was a internationally-known crook.  How can you compared that to Florida when Feeney is not going to get the kind of press that a corrupt House Majority Leader does and Crist is at 73% in the polls?

Think of it this way: The Florida Democratic Party is like the New Jersey Republican Party.  Everybody thinks that they are sleeping giants, that they can win races because they see a few poll numbers, but at the end of the day, neither party wins anything in their respective states.  


by KDJ on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 02:29:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I just want to echo KDJ's comments.  Florida looks a lot more winnable than it actually is.  I think everyone remembers Gore 2000 and forgets everything else.  The Democratic Party in the state is very weak (and that's putting it kindly)---no viable candidates, no money, no plan, etc.  Florida might also have the most powerful state Republican apparatus in the country.  They give up South Florida minus the Cuban demographics and completely dominate everywhere else.  Just look at the supermajorities in the Florida House and Senate.  They'll be able to control redistricting in 2010.  Other than Nelson holding onto his Senate seat, the one highlight of the DECADE for the Democrats is that Charlie Crist doesn't seem quite as conservative as Jeb Bush.  Just not much to hang your hat on right now.


by Double B on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 03:32:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I agree that most people see 2000 and think "winnable."  A lot has changed since then, and despite migration to Florida from New York and other blue states, Florida keeps getting more red.  Like you said, it has to do with party infrastructure.  Unfortunately, at this point we have such a good chance winning everywhere else that I don't feel the need to invest here.


by KDJ on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 07:38:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Mahoney should be able to establish himself in FL-16 and win it for at least a few terms.  The district is not nearly as Republican as it once was, only R+2.  Also, he could actually be helped by redistricting if the legislature wants to make the new seats Republican by taking away his most Republican territory and creating a safely Republican district out of it.


by Toddwell on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 03:52:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Yeah, the interesting thing you are eluding to is that Florida is going to pick up at least two house seats after the next census.  Ironically, one of them is probably going to be drawn up in Central Florida where Feeney's district is.  You are right, they could indeed draw Mahoney a Democratic district given where he is.  However, we are talking about the Republican Party of Florida here... ha ha ha


by KDJ on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 07:37:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I would think that they would rather conceed FL-16 to Mahoney and ensure that the two new districts are Republican than try to weaken him further and create the possibility of losing one or both of the new districts.


by Toddwell on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 09:06:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I live in Feeney's district.  I have not voted for him in the past two elections, however, he keeps winning with a pretty sizable lead.  The last guy Curtis was an alternative, but was not someone that could beat Feeney.  We (dems) need a solid candidate that has credibility and funding to run against this guy.  That is the problem, is that there hasn't been a strong field of candidates to run against him.  Hopefully that will change...

Very Frustrating...


by georgeg1011 on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 11:32:12 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (3.00 / 1)

Feeney could be vulnerable but as Thirsty Gator and george1011 point out we haven't had a really strong a candidate to oppose him. Feeney ran a bizarre campaign where he sent out a glossy mailer that looked like he was supporting Curtis's position on many issues, then blasted him for being "kooky', especially about rigged voting machines. The MSM picked up on that but the underground media like "The Orlando Weekly" dis as well. Clint could not gain any traction, but even respected columnist Mike Thomas of the "Orlando Sentinal" backed "kooky Curtis."


by Russ Jarmusch on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 11:47:42 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Hi Russ! Fancy meeting you here. ;-)

Clint was also endorsed in 2006 by the Daytona Beach News-Journal, both against the Dem primary challenger (Andy Michaud) and against Feeney in the general. I believe Clint can win in 2008 with our support.

And to all those who say Clint's a nutcase - not true, but even if it were, I'd take a Dem nutcase over a corrupt Repub any day. ;-)


by pattyp on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 04:12:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I live in FL-15, just south of Feeney's district. The major problem facing Democrats in these two districts is an ineffective and almost non-existant party apparatus here in Brevard County (Jerome, you forgot the most important part of Feeney's district, the one with Kennedy Space Center!)

I don't think there is a single Florida House or Senate district in Brevard held by a Democrat. The state legislative races don't even have Democratic challengers, not even perennial ones. The only Democrats to win the Brevard County vote in 2006 were Senator Bill Nelson and CFO Alex Sink, both with large margins statewide.

Florida Today, the major newspaper on the Space Coast, endorsed both Feeney and Weldon last time around, even though the editorial board has a liberal tilt. Their reasoning was "we disagree with everything these Represenatives stand for, but they bring home the bacon!" With the Republicans no longer in the majority, the influence Feeney and Weldon have in Congress is greatly diminished. That's a plus, but is that, even with these Ambroff's ties considered, enough to put FL-24 in play?

I'm afraid it's going to be extremely difficult unless we get credible Democratic challengers running up and down the ticket and a major overhaul of the Democratic party apparatus in this area.


by College Progressive on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 12:56:32 PM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

I'm sorry, I meant Jonathan forgot that FL-24 contains northern Brevard County, too. I guess I'm just used to the idea that you're all Jerome!


by College Progressive on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 12:57:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (3.00 / 1)

Let us not forget that Feeney is also the corrupt evildoer who asked programmer Clint Curtis, as per his affidavit, to rig the voting machines in Florida.


by notime4lies on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 02:49:36 PM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

Why are congressmen whose names end in -ey particularly susceptable to corruption?


by Hong Kong Chevy on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 01:37:45 AM EST

Re: Feeney's Abramoff Ties Could Put FL-24 in Play (none / 0)

FWIW, an update today from BradBlog:

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4460

And a word for many of the strategerists here, particularly those in Florida.

Please consider, just for a second, that you may have no idea just how much GOP stealing is going on -- and has been for years -- particularly in "red" areas where few people can be bothered to look.


by Dusty on Thu Apr 26, 2007 at 08:23:18 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.