Making Don Imus Unprofitable

The problem with Imus is not that he's a racist, it's that he's rich and powerful and has no real set of counterparts.  Minority ownership of media outlets in America is pitifully low, as is the power and reach of community radio, or public access television.  In fact, except for the internet, our media structures are exceptionally undemocratic and subsidized heavily by the government to the tune of $500 billion.  But don't take my word for it, take the word of FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, who is calling for a 'New America Media Contract'.  Here's what it is.

"We, the American people have given broadcasters free use of the nation's most valuable spectrum, and we expect something in return. We expect this.

First, a right to media that strengthens our democracy;

Second, a right to local stations that are actually local;

Third, a right to media that looks and sounds like America;

Fourth, a right to news that isn't canned and radio playlists that aren't for sale; and

Fifth, a right to programming that isn't so damned bad so damned often

When we do have a diverse media structure like the internet, amazing things happen. Some time this or next month, the FCC is going to set up rules for how an incredibly rich piece of spectrum will be allocated.  This spectrum could do anything from create a new wireless network to provide universal and openly neutral broadband network to enrich incumbent telephone companies and the media conglomerates that profit off of Imus's hate speech.

It will soon be up to us to put pressure on the FCC to make a wise choice.  We have allies in Ed Markey and John Dingell, as well as a diverse chorus of labor, minority groups, and media reform wonks.  But the argument should be clear.  If there's a public brouhaha around Don Imus, and we still give $500 billion in public airwaves to the people that employ him, then they really won't have much of an incentive to clamp down on people like Imus.  Racism will still be too profitable.



Display:


Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

I think firing him would only be counterproductive and let racists do their thing in hiding. I am flabbergasted as I still see quite a few whites (some even from northern places) throw out racist terms, sometimes even "nigger" when talking about African Americans. It's like they let their guard down around me despite the fact that I am Indian and not white. SO when Whites says that this is a thing of the past, I say bullshit.

But I am a strong advocate of free speech. So I would prefer if famous guests would do what Cal Ripken Jr did with Imus. Cal declined to show up for his scheduled spot this week. I want to see so called respectable journalists like Fineman and politicians like Dodd not give Imus the importance that blowhard desires. Spend the 5 min you would on Imus on some other show instead. Imus show would die a slow death that way.

Start by questioning your politicians why they are so chummy with this guy. This is a guy who likened Lamont to that pedophile who claimed to kill Jon Benet Ramsey. He has called Robin of Howard Stern a "n***er". He has called Gwen Ifill a cleaning lady. He seems to have major racist issues with black women, especially, dark black women.


by Pravin on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 02:10:56 PM EST

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

The problem with Imus is not that he's a racist, it's that he's rich and powerful and has no real set of counterparts.

Indeedy. I've never felt more disconnected from the establishment/boomer generation. These people actually seem to think Imus is cool. They behave like he's captain of the damn football team. Mind-boggling.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 02:25:52 PM EST

Just remember to apply the Bush filter: (none / 0)

What a huge, steaming PILE!

"media that strengthens our democracy" = "get Arianna Huffington and Katrina Van Den Heuvel off the air"

"local stations that are actually local" = "no letting unions and minorities know that there are other people like them elsewhere to organize with"

"media that looks and sounds like America" -- WTF does THAT mean?!

"news that isn't canned and radio playlists that aren't for sale" = classic Bush tactic of up=down, light=dark; so "isn't canned" = "is canned by the GOP" and "isn't for sale" = "for sale by the GOP"

"programming that isn't so damned bad so damned often" = "programming that isn't so damned bad for the GOP's image so damned often", i.e., "use the FCC to bring the hammer down on rap music, political criticism, reports of investigations, Keith Olbermann, the popularity of peace, documentaries about moderate Islam, the Dalai Lama, stem cell research success, alternative energy, diplomacy, France, Gandhi, shrinking ice caps, exploding budgets, exploding IEDs, the reasons why US/Iran relations are so bad, and all the other things that aren't 'I'm proud to be an American' on the radio and 'Fox News' on TV."


by ideahamster on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 02:36:30 PM EST

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

This is not about Imus. It's about our airwaves.  We've got crappy news.  Each network should pay 10% of its total operating costs into a trust to be used for public service programming (informational and worthwhile programming) two hours per day as payment for the use of the spectrum.  News programs should be rated by a randomly selected  and rotating panel of scholars and journalists, and there should be NO communication between the network and the public service broadcasters.  We should have low cost broadband across the country.  We should have innovative high quality music instead of bubble gum.  We should remember that it's our country and our airwaves.    


by prince myshkin on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 02:51:28 PM EST

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

Why is Imus "the' problem? Why isn't the problem the fact that these words are in common usage?


by del on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 03:15:08 PM EST

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

He's not the problem, the media structure is the problem.


by Matt Stoller on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 03:37:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (3.00 / 0)

I'm Hannah Sassaman, an organizer with Prometheus Radio Project -- also known as the plaintiffs in Prometheus vs. the FCC, the lawsuit representing millions of Americans fighting even more media consolidation (http://prometheusradio.org/content/view/ 41/125/).  We also work closely with media reform and media justice groups to fight back with practical solutions to media consolidation.

If we want to challenge the structure that puts people like Imus in every home, we need toL

1)  Stop media consolidation -- and expand our outreach to folks who need to understand that content they don't like comes from stations not
accountable to the cities where they broadcast.

2)  Get the word out about one of the last chances ever to build our own, full-power, local radio stations across the country. (Check http://www.prometheusradio.org or http://www.getradio.org to learn more about that).

Earlier this year, when Troi Torain, also known as 'DJ Star', filled New York City's airwaves with some pretty virulent speech (mostly focused on
offering $500 rewards to find out the name of the preschool of a rival DJ's daughter and sexual/excretory innuendo aimed at the same child), a number of community organizations, including Prometheus and Radio Rootz, a radio training program for kids and others in NYC, decided to fight back by collecting folks' horror at what Troi said, and focusing it on the fact that Clear Channel owned the station that hosted him.

It was totally disgusting that this man used the public airwaves to threaten a child -- but even more disgusting that this threat was simulcast on 11 other stations up and down the East coast.  

Clear Channel, owner of Power 105, was syndicating DJ Star's show -- and his New York-focused baiting of DJ Envy on Hot 97 -- in cities as far south as the Carolinas.  Many comments from all across the East Coast came in -- thousands of miles away from Troi's seat in NYC.

Rootz and Prometheus developed this tool -- http://www.nohateradio.org -- to help feed anger about DJ Star's misbehavior on our airwaves into
complaints at the FCC, and fuel for an eventual license challenge.

What's the structural problem here:  When we limit how many stations big, distant broadcasters like GE/NBC or Clear Channel get to own, it means that local stations are much more accountable to local listeners and viewers.  Strategies like advertiser boycotts mean a lot more when a local station is a larger percentage of an owner's portfolio than
just one station out of almost 1300 (http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom/s earch/profile.aspx?id=M000071).

A deep well of anger about the way that our airwaves are used to batter our kids, our families, our local businesses, and our local
communities is growing every day.  Are the folks who cry indecency so different than us, who are fighting to reform the ownership of our media?  If we can be effective at letting people know that media accountablity is a function of consolidation, and that folks who want more control over content have a venue to ask for it at the FCC media ownership proceeding -- we'll reach many, many more people.

It doesn't stop there, though.  We have to take every advantage we can of opportunities to build our own stations.  The FCC is opening up a
once-in-a-generation 7 day window for groups to apply for their own full power, noncommercial radio stations, October 12-19th, 2007.  This
window will likely not open again.  If we want to strengthen communities' voices on the air, we gotta get the word out.  Visit http://www.prometheusradio.org, http://www.getradio.org, or http://www.radioforpeople.org to see if a station will be available in your city, this fall.


-- ----- hannah sassaman prometheusradioproject building radio stations = awesome http://www.prometheusradio.org 215-727-9620
by hannahjs on Wed Apr 11, 2007 at 05:16:56 PM EST

Re: Making Don Imus Unprofitable (none / 0)

Don Imus is way out of line and should be taken off the air. MSNBC did the right thing in cancelling his show. I strongly urge anyone who found his racial slurs offensive to write to the head of CBS Corp., who has ultimate say over what is and is not broadcast:

President and CEO Leslie Moonves
CBS Corporation
51 W. 52nd St.
New York, NY 10019-6188


Lester Gesteland (CeaseRacism.blogspot.com)
by lesterjg on Thu Apr 12, 2007 at 03:40:39 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.