Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign Over Prosecutor Purge?

Did Arlen Specter, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, just call for the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales over the prosecutor purge scandal? You be the judge (h/t TPM Muckraker).

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, suggested that Gonzales's status as the nation's leading law enforcement officer might not last through the remainder of President Bush's term, pointedly disputing the attorney general's public rationale for the mass firings.

"One day there will be a new attorney general, maybe sooner rather than later," Specter said at a committee hearing where a new round of subpoenas to the Justice Department was considered.

After the meeting, Specter declined to elaborate on that remark, but told reporters that most of the blame for the ongoing controversy rests with the attorney general. "It's snowballing, mostly with the help of the Department of Justice," he said.

Specter is certainly not a doctrinaire conservative -- at least not the likes of John Ensign, who has also come out recently with sharp words over this scandal -- but this could nonetheless be a real problem for the Bush administration and AG Gonzales, specifically, as they try to combat the coverage of this scandal. Should it come to the point where Gonzales is hauled before the judiciary committee or, however unlikely (at this point, at least), he is impeached in the House and tried in the Senate, Specter could serve as a strong Republican voice in opposition to the prosecutor purge.

Update [2007-3-8 17:59:32 by Jonathan Singer]: Just in from Chuck Schumer, via release, Gonzales appears to be beginning to back down.

“While we didn’t get any better explanation for these unprecedented firings, two important developments came from this meeting. First, the Attorney General told us the Administration would not oppose our legislation requiring Senate confirmation for all U.S. Attorneys. Second, in one form or another, each of the five Department of Justice witnesses will be made available to us for questioning. The details and venue are still being worked out, but we are hopeful they will cooperate.



Display:


Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to (none / 0)

I'd be satisfied with seeing him called up to Congress, day after day, FORCED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH.

That would inevitably lead to his resignation.


by rikyrah on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:12:44 PM EST

Specter Talks Tough (3.00 / 1)

In related news, sticks and stones may break my bones.


by BingoL on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:13:06 PM EST

Re: Specter Talks Tough (none / 0)

Yeah, what a blowhard.


The truth about McCain
by nstrauss on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 07:23:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Resign Over Prosecutor Purge? (none / 0)

It sounded more like a threat than a request to me.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:13:46 PM EST

Resign Over Prosecutor Purge? (none / 0)

Wasn't it Specter who put the provision into the Patriot Act that allowed for the wholesale firing of Federal Attorneys?

He is a two-faced putz, I wouldn't take anything he says very seriously.


by global yokel on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:34:40 PM EST

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign... (3.00 / 2)

Specter is a fraud. There is zero chance he will follow through on this. More likely, he will try to find some way to facilitate getting the administration off the hook. That would be completely consistent with his entire political history.


by AmIDreamintg on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:45:48 PM EST

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign... (none / 0)

I dunno.  He doesn't want to be another Rick Santorum.  Maybe he'll grow a spine and try to survive the inevitable blueing of Pennsylvania.  


Sam L
by Sam L on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:47:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign... (3.00 / 1)

There is practically zero chance of Specter running again as it is.  He's not worried about the voters.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

Really? Based on what? Just asking...


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:51:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

Based on his age, his ongoing fight with cancer, and the fact that he was nearly defeated in his primary in 2004 by the Club For Growth.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 04:56:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

So far as I know, his cancer is in remission and he looks (CSPAN2 yesterday) to be feeling pretty good.

With "conservative" fruitcakes like Toomey in full retreat these days, I respectfully disagree.

As much as I wish it were so, wishing doesn't make it so.


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:00:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

I firmly believe Toomey will challenge Specter again in 2010 if Specter chooses to run again, only this time he will have a much better chance.  Right-wingers are in retreat throughout the nation, but they still have incredible sway in GOP primaries.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:10:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

So if Toomey is going to run, won't the GOP establishment be on their knees begging Specter to run again - along with another promise of buckets of campaign cash - as the best way to keep Toomey off the ballot as he's a sure loss in November?


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 08:44:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

They may beg, but will Specter be up to the toughest race of his life?


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 09:13:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

Guess I was right - http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/3/19/1552 8/9239


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Mon Mar 19, 2007 at 09:51:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: zero chance of Specter running again ... (none / 0)

Notice how early he's doing it... three and a half years before the election.  He's running scared.  Watch Pat Toomey, or even Rick Santorum.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Tue Mar 20, 2007 at 07:12:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: he's running scared (none / 0)

maybe, or maybe he's looking to pre-empt serious opposition by building an insurmountable war-chest. If he stays healthy and has, I don't know, say $15 or $20MM in the bank by Jan '10, would that turn a challenge into windmill tilting?


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Tue Mar 20, 2007 at 03:51:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: he's running scared (none / 0)

If Santorum ran against him in the primary, which is a possibility, then Santorum wins the nomination.  Regardless of how much Specter wins.  Remember it was Santorum's endorsement of Specter that saved his but in 2004.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Tue Mar 20, 2007 at 07:41:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Santorum challenging Specter (none / 0)

While I do my best to never say never, I really can't imagine a defeated Senate candidate, especially one trounced as badly as Santorum was, running a primary challenge against an incumbent senator with whom he previously served.

This is so against the grain of the ethos of the Senate that it really is unthinkable. If Santorum were to do it, and somehow managed to get elected, he would be persona non grata in the Senate - as close to pre-emptive political suicide as you can get.


by Joe in Wynnewood PA on Tue Mar 20, 2007 at 09:58:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Santorum challenging Specter (none / 0)

A lot of the conservative Republicans aren't fond of Specter.  Santorum was in their leadership and was expected to be "their" candidate in 2008.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 12:31:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign Over (none / 0)

I see Gonzalez resigning in the near future.  He will never testify.  The white house will make the scandal "go away" by having him resign for "personal reasons".  Republicans are excellent about falling on their swords for the good of the party.  If only they did it for the good of the country.

Thanks,

Mike


by lordmikethegreat on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:00:05 PM EST

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign Over (none / 0)


Spector was  responsible for a line in the Patriot Act revision that led to this scandal and his name should be prominently displayed in reporting this story until he announces that he is not running again.
by syvanen on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:00:31 PM EST

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign Over (none / 0)

Yeah, I think this is just typical Specter.  He loves wandering all over the place with his public statements, and I wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't terribly fond of Bush or Gonzales.  But last I checked he was in the minority party in the Senate.  He's not going to make a public demand for Gonzales to resign.  But he might just enjoy talking tough a little bit.  And if Leahy held hearings on this issue in the Senate, you might see Specter grab the chance to stand up to Gonzales and polish his own image a little bit.

And yeah, Specter looks like he's a lame duck, and certainly Bush and Gonzales are, so there's not much to lose here.  


by RickD on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:02:20 PM EST

Re: Is Specter Calling on Gonzales to Resign Over (none / 0)

Just FYI, apparently the Barrone post on the attorneys scandal was a hack, not his real work.


by jnfr on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 05:49:50 PM EST

And Specter Helped Suspend Habeas in '06 (none / 0)

Specter Was Mau Mauing Lindsay Graham about habeas corpus the other day, but Arlen was right there helping Graham suspend it last year.

So either Arlen had a huge epiphany or he's just playing both sides of the fense as usual


by bernardpliers on Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 08:33:11 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.