Hillary Declares: "I Am Proud To Stand By Your Side"

Hillary Clinton speaks at HRC and declares herself a strong ally of the LGBT Community! How refreshing to hear a candidate speak for our rights instead of purely against them, or in vague terms that barelyreference them, or work to completely avoid the issue. She has declared herself proudly against the Federal Marriage Amendment. And I quote:

   

"We will not stand idly by when anyone tries to write discrimination into our Constitution"

   

"We want to make sure that all Americans in committed relationships have equal benefits, from health insurance & life insurance, to social security & property rights, and more. It is wrong that so many people are unable to care for those they love; to leave them their homes & belongings, to ensure they can see a doctor, to visit them in the hospital when they are sick. These are fundamental rights, and we will continue to push until they are equally available."

Now, this stops short of declaring all committed relationships fully equal, but it is the most encouraging rhetorical step forward I have heard in a very long time.  Certainly, this is the strongest step towards equality that has ever been offered by a serious contender for the White House.  The "Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act" should it be passed would be a very positive step in the right direction, but it only extends to Federal employees.  Obviously, that is problematic, but I think it a strategic move forward in an increment that has both the possibility of passing, and the least number of hurdles.  I am thinking of it in terms of "baby steps."  Admittedly that may be naive, but the rhetoric she offered was clear and resolute.  If and when she becomes President, she will be our ally, not our adversary.

"You will always have an open door to my office in the White House."
I think few declarations could be more clear. Hillary definitely wants the support of the LGBT community.  She is unafraid to offer it before she enters the White House, and is willing to bravely promise her support once she is there.

She also came out strongly against her husband's failed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" legislation.  Progress is clearly manifesting itself in the former, and possibly future Clinton Administrations.

"Courage, honor, patriotism, and sacrifice; the traits that define our men and women in uniform have nothing to do with sexual orientation."
Calling an end to, and rightfully claiming a part in the demise of this ridiculous policy is but another positive step for equality in America.

Other high points included support for adoption rights, ENDA, and the passage of the Federal Hate Crimes Legislation.

I am not ready to throw my full support behind any Presidential candidate.  I just think it's silly to consider this so early on,  but for now Hillary has me in her corner.  She is offering just the sort of "partnership" that the LGBT community needs if we wish to see equality in our life times.  Her words are strong and carry power with them.  The mere fact that she is drawing a line of equality in the sand with logical arguments to our credit is enough to offer great potential momentum to our rights as a community.  She speaks of making us full American citizens on paper, not just by birthright.

That works for me.

You can see the entire speech on YouTube at this link.

Enjoy and share!  I think we have a horse in the coral that could win the race, and she has chosen to wear the proud colors of the rainbow.



Display:


LGBT rights (none / 0)

Good, although she's hardly either the only one in the Democratic field to support our rights, nor the best (if that's your only determiner). Both Gravel and Kucinich are pro-gay marriage.

Article "Not only do Kucinich and Gravel support same-sex marriage, but Gravel has pledged to call on Congress to enact it at the federal level."

Personally, I neither think that gay marriage will determine my support for this particular campaign, nor do I think that Congress has the power to enact same-sex marriage (although they could repeal the Defense of Marriage Act), but that's their position.


by Zimbel on Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 06:14:10 PM EST

Re: Hillary Declares: "I Am Proud To Stand (none / 0)

The rhetoric sounds like a pro-civil unions position, not that I'm making a value judgment.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 06:21:47 PM EST

Not exactly (none / 0)

Civil Unions are used by states that:
1) don't want to give equal rights to gays and lesbians (versus straights), but are uncomfortable with the previous level of discrimination

and/or

2) don't want to deal with the consequences of a married gay or lesbian couple moving to another state, where it may have to be recognized. For example, they may end up incurring part or all of the legal fees to defend such a law.

This would be an act by one of the largest employers in the world (the U.S. government) to give equative employment benefits to committed gay or lesbian couples as to married straight couples.

While I'd love Gay/Lesbian marriage to be settled (in our favor) nationally, my legal opinion is that (barring constitutional amendment) it can't be. Determining who can marry in a particular state is a right reserved for that state. Marriages transfer (barring the Defense Against Marriage Act actually having any teeth, of which I'm skeptical) between states regardless of the receiving state's wishes.


by Zimbel on Mon Mar 05, 2007 at 06:59:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not exactly (none / 0)

Marriages don't transfer between states if the receiving state's public policy is offended.  For example, if Florida decides to let you marry your sister, no other state has to recognize it if they don't want to.  The public policy exception to the full faith and credit clause has been recognized for a century or longer.  I'm not sure whether to say DOMA has teeth in this regard since the law would have been the same whether or not DOMA was passed.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Mar 07, 2007 at 01:36:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.