McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who Pressured Prosecutor

Earlier today I noted that most signs pointed to two New Mexico Republicans, Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson, as the members of Congress who allegedly tried to apply pressure on a United States Attorney to ramp up an investigation of a former Democratic state legislator during the lead up to the 2006 midterms. Now newspaper chain McClatchy has explicitly named the two. Marisa Taylor has the story.

Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson of New Mexico pressured the U.S. attorney in their state to speed up indictments in a federal corruption investigation that involved at least one former Democratic state senator, according to two people familiar with the contacts.

The alleged involvement of the two Republican lawmakers raises questions about possible violations of House of Representatives and Senate ethics rules and could taint the criminal investigation into the award of an $82 million courthouse contract.

The two people with knowledge of the incident said Domenici and Wilson intervened in mid-October, when Wilson was in a competitive re-election campaign that she won by 875 votes out of nearly 211,000 cast.

David Iglesias, who stepped down as U.S. attorney in New Mexico on Wednesday, told McClatchy Newspapers that he believed the Bush administration fired him Dec. 7 because he resisted the pressure to rush an indictment.

If this story has the legs it appears to have, it has the potential to not only further decimate the New Mexico Republican Party but also to make it significantly more difficult for Republicans to retake control over either chamber of Congress in 2008.

The New Mexico Republican Party is already in a fairly difficult situation. Last fall they failed to offer much of a challenge to Governor Bill Richardson, their nominee garnering only 31 percent of the vote and carrying a single county, Catron, and winning that one by only five votes. What's more, Republicans are not terribly close to power in either chamber of the state legislature, with the Democrats holding a state House and a 24 to 18 seat majority in the state Senate. In many ways, the last remaining vestige of Republican power in the state come in the form of Domenici's Senate seat and the Congressional seats of Wilson and Steve Pearce. Suffice it to say that if both Wilson and Domenici, who are up in 2008, are not able to run for reelection or are so damaged by this scandal that they cannot win a reelection bid, the Republican Party in the state would find itself almost completely out of power.

But this story does not only have the potential to affect Republicans within New Mexico. Republicans nationally need both Wilson's seat and Domenici's if they harbor any desire to reclaim control over either chamber of Congress next fall. With Domenici out of the picture, the Republicans would have at best a 50 percent shot (and perhaps even significantly lower) at retaining his seat, at the least forcing the NRSC to devote millions to a seat they otherwise might not plan on needing to defend and at most handing the Democrats another pick-up opportunity in a region in which they have performed well in recent Senate elections. Additionally, Republicans looking to win back the House in 2008 have their work cut out for them already, needing to pick up even more seats that the Democrats had to last year in order to win control over the chamber. The loss of this Democratic-leaning seat, which probably would have swund to the Democrats in 2006 had it not been for a major gaffe during a debate late in the campaign, would further complicate the math for the GOP.

And even beyond the races directly affected by this seemingly brewing scandal, the Republican brand nationally could be further tarnished (if such a thing were even possible) by news of the politicization of the United States Attorney's office. We should know a lot more next week when a number of fired prosecutors, including Iglesias and Carol Lam, who led the ongoing charge against imprisoned GOP Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, which reaches into the upper echelons of the CIA and potentially could hit other Republican members of Congress, will speak under oath before a subcommittee hearing in the House. If this story packs even half of the heat that it seems to, it's going to be bad, bad news for the Republican Party.



Display:


I can imagine the Dem House going after Heather (none / 0)

Wilson; they WANT that seat and feel like they earned it this last cycle, but for the foolishness of Patsy Madrid.  I don't think House Dems are too impressed with Wilson.

I have trouble imagining that the Senate Dems are willing to push hard though if Domenici is in the crosshairs.  Comity and old man and all that jazz.  And if they don't want to push Domenici hard, they may force the House to go easy on Wilson, since they're both guilty of exactly the same thing and it'd be very hard to nail one and not the other.  Dems may decide to play soft on both of them due to Senate comity stuff.

On the other hand, Schumer would love to see Domenici embarrassed just enough that he retires.  That level of embarrassment wouldn't be enough to do in Wilson completely, so the DCCC would still be stuck spending $3 mill on that race in 2008.  How much is comity worth to ya, boys?

And also, the Iglesias case is tied into the Lam case, and congressional Dems have a big interest in Lam's firing.  She presumably was chasing down Duncan Hunter and maybe Jerry Lewis or Porter Goss, which aren't winnable districts but would make great headlines.

There's also the principle of the thing.

There may be too many juicy morsels for the Dems to extend the traditional look-the-other-way courtesy.  I hope they hit this hard, but honestly, if they really do chase down Domenici's involvement in this, I'll be quite surprised.

They should remember that the GOP would NEVER go easy on them.  Imagine it were Max Baucus in a similar situation.  They would be ALL OVER HIM.  Remember what they did to Sandy Berger??  


by texas dem on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 07:08:29 AM EST

Re: I can imagine the Dem House going after Heathe (none / 0)

The Senate won't expel Dumb-'n-itchy no matter what he did, which is what it would take to pry him out of his chair.  However, spending $$$ to get rid of the Weasel is not our worst outcome.  My recurring nightmare is Senator Weasel, which I now think won't happen.  So turn up the heat!  I hear that possum is mighty tasty.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 10:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Iglesias Meets Cruise, Nicholson, Demi Moore (none / 0)

in a newshook-fest like we haven't seen in some time.

For once MSM lassitude and cheap-shottery works powerfully in favor of transparency and against right-wing defiance or ethics and law.

Thanks to luck and the narrative instincts of Aaron Sorkin, "Code Red," "You can't handle the truth," "You want me on that wall, you NEED me on that wall" and a hundred other guy-movie dialogue chestnuts from "A Few Good Men" are just sitting there for tabloids and broadsheets alike to use as attention-grabbers.

I heard Iglesias last night on a long NPR interview and the guy has stage presence. Vocabulary, timbre, timing, pauses... he's an awesome witness. Good-looking, Hispanic...

We shouldn't need all the cultural sideshow that comes with Iglesias being the basis for Lt. Daniel Kaffee's character in the Rob Reiner cult classic, but we've got it. Now there's two ways to turn up the heat on NM Republicans, one legitimate and one cheap-o but great.


Within weeks they'll be re-opening the shipyards And notifying the next of kin --Elvis Costello
by ShagBark on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 09:22:59 AM EST

Re: Iglesias Meets Cruise, Nicholson, Demi Moore (none / 0)

I heard Iglesias last night on a long NPR interview and the guy has stage presence. Vocabulary, timbre, timing, pauses... he's an awesome witness.

Your description gives oomph to the story I read about Iglesias' parting announcement. He really took umbrage at having his accomplishments denigrated by the DOJ. He has the spine that many of us are looking for in our congresscritters!


by Books Alive on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 10:47:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Iglesias Meets Cruise, Nicholson, Demi Moore (none / 0)

Yeah.  Too bad he's a pug.  At the same time, he won't come out smelling like a rose, either.  Remember that he didn't report the contacts to the Justice Department, which opens an opportunity for the pugs to question his character.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 10:17:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Carol Lam... (none / 0)

Carol Lam is the big one.  Remember, the White House was the one doing the firing here.  And Lam's Cunningham investigation was getting closer and closer to the CIA.  Certainly, her investigation caused some concern among Congressional Republicans.  But the CIA falls under the White House, and Foggo was a creature of Porter Goss and Karl Rove.  Who gave the order to fire Lam?  What does Dusty Foggo know?  Where were these millions and millions of dirty dollars going?  

With Harry Reid struggling with Iraq, I think indicting some White House figures could be just what the doctor ordered for Congressional Dems.  So much of the Iraq debate is about momentum...and if the White House is on its heels, those fence sitting Republican senators are much more likely to kiss Bush and his 29% approval ratings goodbye...

Think about it: just the other day, we heard rumors (from Sy Hersh) that Negroponte wanted out as Intelligence Chief because of black ops dollars flowing to Sunni militants affiliated with al-Qaida.  

Dusty Foggo.  Brent Wilkes.  The CIA.  Black ops programs.  Six years of zero oversight.  Money going to al-Qaida.  Secret prisons.  Assassinations.  Scandal.  What else?

All Dems have to do is pull the string.  If they start using their subpoena power they can win the Iraq debate by sending the Administration's approval numbers into the teens.  Dark, dark things have been going on in this country's name for the last six years.   Pull the string.


by owenz on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 10:56:52 AM EST

Re: Carol Lam... (none / 0)

I'm confused.  The Democrats finally have subpoena power.  They claimed oversight would be back when they were in charge.  But it's  not.  Dusty Foggo - the #3 guy at CIA - was just indicted.  Porter Goss quit as head of CIA because of the same scandal.  Carol Lam gets fired for investigating.  Where are the subpoenas?

Sy Hersh is publishing articles about how Cheney's office is running black ops programs that even CIA doesn't know about.  And he's saying that John Negroponte quits his post as Intelligence Chief because he's terrified of being associated with Cheney's programs.  Where are the subpoenas?

Dems are sitting there doing a kabuki dance over non-binding Iraq resolutions...why?  The White House is at 29% approval and the filth of the last 6 years is just sitting there, untouched by Congress.  Where are the subpoenas???

Hint to Dems: investigate.  Once the White House is on its heels, the Iraq debate will get a whole lot easier...


by owenz on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 11:50:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

I think Wilson is done anyway, no matter what the House Democrats do.

She won by less than 600 votes? How many votes is it worth to have campaign advertisments attacking her for attempting to influence a criminal investigation so that Republicans would have SOME Democrat to point to say "See! They all do it!"

The next Democrat to run for her seat ought to be able to carve her up over this scandal. She used political influence with the White House to try and influence a criminal investigation.

She looks terrible over this and there's no reason to let voters forget it!


by Cugel on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 11:06:09 AM EST

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

I'm not convinced that the Weasel is done for.  It depends on who runs against her.  Remember, she managed to hang on to the NM CD1 seat during a very bad year for Republicans.  Moreover, she lost by 4-5% in the election day and early vote counts, which makes the reasoning that she lost the election because of Madrid's horrible debate performance suspect.  

There are lots of reasons the Weasel "won."  My favorite is suspected vote counting fraud in the absentee ballot hand count.  Luckily, there are two positive developments on that front.  First, NM will have automatic random audits of machine tallies.  It will only be 2% of the vote, but a discrepancy will trigger a full recount.  That means that at least some of the absentee ballots will be recounted.  

Second, the new Bernalillo County Clerk, Maggie Toulouse, is a bona fide progressive.  She got her job at least in part on the strength of lots of letters to the County Commissioners from Democracy for New Mexico members, whose support she wisely courted.  Moreover, she has made several excellent hires for key staff positions and cleared out some old, clueless deadwood.

I am hopeful that we can finally kick the Weasel to the curb.  Believe me, NM Democrats will not let the voters forget about the outrageously unethical ex parte communications.  However, we still have to nominate a good candidate to run against her.  If we settle for another schmuck, the Weasel will probably eke out another term.  


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 10:13:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Politicizing the US attorneys (none / 0)

is just evil and wrong, and using the US Attorney of NM to do partisan witch-hunting should be a felony.

Wilson is just a scumbag.


by dataguy on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 11:07:45 AM EST

Re: Politicizing the US attorneys (none / 0)

You are correct.   Heather Weasel is a scumbag.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 09:53:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici (none / 0)

In each of the last four elections, the overall statewide House vote for New Mexico went against the Republicans.  Their share of the two party vote statewide was 47.8% in 2000, 40.01% in 2002, 48.2% in 2004, and 44.2% in 2006.  The 2004 Presidential vote in New Mexico drew legal challenges and was perhaps the most questionable in the country with touch screen results (particularly undervotes) being cited.  Wilson's district was the center of the controversy.

Wilson knew she was in for the battle of her political life and knew that the Bush machine would not be directly involved.  District lines saved Wilson in 2004.  For this one, she wanted to pull out all the stops.


by David Kowalski on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:05 AM EST

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici (none / 0)

If this scandal/crime developed just right, Domenici could be forced into a situation where he needed to resign.  I know, highly improbable, but if that happened, then Governor Bill Richardson could appoint his replacement (Tom Udall?) and the Senate would be firmly in Dem hands (without the possibility of tiebreaker votes by Darth Cheney) even if Lieberman switched.


by leveller on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 11:27:51 AM EST

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici (none / 0)

That's an interesting idea, even if a Dumb-'n-itchy resignation is extremely unlikely.  However, it might keep the old buzzard from running again in '08, which would be a very good thing for us indeed.  It's unclear whether Tom Udall would leave his extremely safe House seat for a run at an open Senate seat, but I doubt he'd give up the chance to be appointed.  

Tom's a good liberal Democrat.  I'd love to see him in the Senate.  


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 09:52:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

Senator Bill Richardson sounds so well..


by adilla on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 02:40:11 PM EST

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

Senator Bill Richardson (D-NM) sounds so well


by adilla on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 02:41:20 PM EST

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

Ludicrous.  Governor Richardson has no interest in the Senate seat.  He was a Congressman for several terms, but he likes executive power and perks.  If he doesn't end up as President, which I think is a distinct possibility, he'd be more likely to be a cabinet secretary, probably Secretary of State.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Fri Mar 02, 2007 at 09:45:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McClatchy Names Wilson, Domenici as Those Who (none / 0)

t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 t11 t12 t13 t14 t15 t16 t17 t18 t19 t20 t21 t22 t23 t24 t25 t26 t27 t28 t29 t30 t31 t32 t33 t34 t35 t36 t37 t38 t39 t40 t41 t42 t43 t44 t45 t46 t47 t48 t49 t50 t51 t52 t53 t54 t55 t56 t57 t58 t59 t60 t61 t62 t63 t64 t65 t66 t67 t68 t69 t70 t71 t72 t73 t74 t75 t76 t77 t78 t79 t80 t81


by renouv1 on Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 06:25:09 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.