Meet the Press 3/18

  On MTP today the Democrats rose to the occasion with a thoughtful and restrained analysis of Iraq. Until today I have never heard of Joe Sestak or Tom Andrews for that matter, and I was thinking why did they get these B list dems to counter the likes of Tom Delay and Richard Perle. But what I saw from these men was one of the most cogent arguments for redeployment yet. In the face of a constant barrage of "aiding and abetting the enemy, helping the terrorists, wanting to surrender" comments from DeLay and Perle Sestak and Andrews delivered their message in with undeniable skill.
  On This Week Pat Leahy stung his counterpart Cornyn and served the ball right into the Bush admins court when he said he was sick of meeting with White House officials and having their statements later turn out to be false, so he would subpoena Carl Rove to get answers. Schumer also said as much on MTP and they both are tenacious lawyers who will get some accountability from the slippery lawbreakers in the White House.
  I heard Cenk on "the Young Turks" saying how frustrated he was that the dems were weak, and his partner said they suffered from "balzhiemers," but just because they don't take the impeachment tack doesn't mean they are weak. We have Murtha, we have Webb, we have Kerry, Murphy, Boxer, and now Sestak. Weak my ass.  



Display:


Re: Meet the Press 3/18 (none / 0)

You have to remember that the Young Turks are so used to watching the Dems cave and have set the bar so high (impeachment)that "Wimpy Dems" is pretty much built up in their minds.


by spirowasright on Sun Mar 18, 2007 at 01:52:52 PM EST

Re: Meet the Press 3/18 (none / 0)

Recognizing that the Senate is 51-49 (by some estimations) is not being "wimpy".  It is recognizing that while the Democratic victory of 2006 was sweeping, there are limits to our current capabilities.  Pushing beyond them will prove destructive to the goal of incresing our capabilities in the future.

We cannot remove Bush from office.  The best we can do is have him be the albatross around the neck of whomever the GOP nominates in '08.   The Republicans as a whole must run in the next election by repudiating their own record.  

Andrews did a better job than Sestak, though both missed a real chance to pin their opponents down on the question of redeployment vs. OPEN-ENDED COMMITMENT.  We really need to define the administration plan as just that, both because it's truthful and politically smart.

Andrews vs. Collins for the Maine Senate seat???  


Take out the trash. Down with Saxby Chambliss!
by CLLGADEM on Sun Mar 18, 2007 at 02:38:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.