Edwards Catagorically Supports Murtha Plan

Citizen 53 has posted the full transcript of an almost hour long interview with John Edwards from WNYC Radio. (Audio link here).

This is an in depth interview with detailed examination of every position that matters in this election:

This interview is an excellent example of Edwards in full.  shows his policies and much of who he is as a person, a human being, running for President.

If you have the time, I hope you will read it and offer your comments.

Clearly, what follows is better than any sound bite.  is Edwards's views in depth, where he has an opportunity to expound.  gives interested DKos'ers [and MyDD'rs -- Mark] a chance to become better educated about Edwards, straight from Edwards, not from the flame wars in a thread that contains oft-repeated information and misinformation that, alas, is so prevalent in the blogosphere.

Get some coffee, settle back, and enjoy!

It's the following exchange that catches the eye. No other major candidate takes this position. None. As the Democratic Congressional Leadership quietly distance themselves from John Murtha's position that the time to get out of Iraq starts now, Edwards has Murtha's back:
 
BL: And what if you were in the house? This Murtha plan...

JE: I'm for it.

BL: ... to starve the war by requiring shorter stays for American troops, longer intervals between tours, some other things...you're for it?

JE: I'm for it.

BL: You'd vote for it.

JE: I'm for it.

BL: Alright then, do one other thing on this before we leave Iraq to distinguish yourself from the other presidential c...

JE: Can I interrupt you for just a minute?

BL: Sure

JE: You did that very quickly. The Murtha plan that I know about is one that requires American troops not to be sent back for another deployment in Iraq, some of them 3rd and 4th deployments without adequate training, without adequate equipment - is that what you're talking about?

BL: Yes.

JE: OK. Yes, I'm for that.

BL: Which is just an indirect way to stop the troop surge, true?

JE: Yeah, yeah - it certainly affects the number of troops in Iraq.

This is very clear. Surely THE most unambiguous statement a politician could ever make regarding the Murtha plan, and John Edwards is the ONLY presidential candidate saying this.

This is big folks, possibly the best talking point Edwards Supporters have.



Display:


Edwards also publicly (3.00 / 1)

turned against the war about 4 days before Murtha in 2005


Call it "Medicare Option" not public option
by TarHeel on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 05:49:42 PM EST

Re: Edwards also publicly (none / 0)

Do you have links on this?


Michigan For Edwards and Labor-Netroots for Edwards
by philgoblue on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 09:42:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Edwards also publicly (none / 0)

The Wash Post op-ed is what he is refering to I believe.


by okamichan13 on Thu Mar 01, 2007 at 12:22:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Edwards Catagorically Supports Murtha Plan (3.00 / 1)

His Iraq plan released on 2-14-07 also expressly questioned the continued validity of the AUMF of 2002 before Biden or Levin.

Unless I am mistaken.


by citizen53 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 06:04:10 PM EST

Re: Edwards Catagorically Supports Murtha Plan (none / 0)

I'm glad he's with Murtha on this, we need a serious plan to get out of Iraq and Murtha's got a good plan that wouldn't negatively affect the troops serving right now.


Netroots Director for Oregon Senate Candidate Jeff Merkley
by Sarah Lane on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 07:32:46 PM EST

Re: Edwards Catagorically Supports Murtha Plan (none / 0)

I'm curious why Murtha's plan doesn't resonate with his colleagues in the House.  Any bloggers here know?


by benny06 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 07:33:46 PM EST

Re: Edwards Catagorically Supports Murtha Plan (none / 0)

Their claim is that his plan represents, "micromanagement of the war", which they don't want to be associated with.


by jfoster on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 08:47:36 PM EST

Re: Do You Agree (none / 0)

I'm still a bit in the dark...


by benny06 on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 10:08:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do You Agree (none / 0)

because they are letting others frame Murtha's plan as a cut in funding for the troops.


by okamichan13 on Thu Mar 01, 2007 at 12:23:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.