Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts, Falls Flat

The Politico, the new Capitol Hill newspaper-cum-website-cum-multimedia-new s-organization, may only be about a month old, but it's already getting into the business of running half-rate hits on the Democratic leadership. Currently, one of the lead news items on the site (and I'd imagine one of the front page stories in the paper edition out in the morning) penned by Daniel W. Reilly and Jim VandeHei proclaims from its headline, "Pelosi Falls Short On Election Promises". Among other things, the article snipes at the new Democratic Speaker for the following:

  • Holding only one five-day work week since Congress has been in session;
  • Allowing just one open rule on a piece of legislation on the floor; and
  • Seating Bill Jefferson on the homeland security panel.

Taking the second smear first, it is one that I smacked down not even three weeks ago on this site. Republicans have indeed complained that they have not been able to offer up their own alternatives to Democratic legislation and resolutions, a complaint that, on its surface, seems quite fair. But a deeper look at the issue, as I attempted earlier this month, shows that the Democrats one open rule less than a month into the current Congress matched the total number of open rules on non-appropriations legislation allowed by the Republican leadership over the entire course of the previous Congress. What's more, The Hill's Jim Snyder reports in Tuesday's edition that "a measure to update the rules governing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) [...] is expected to come to the floor under an open rule" after having been passed by House Republicans using a closed rule last year. So not only are House Democrats allowing open rules on the same issues upon which Republicans used closed rules just one year ago, they are also on track to double the number of open rules on non-appropriations legislation that the GOP House allowed -- with well over 20 months remaining in the Congress.

The other two attacks mentioned by Reilly and VandeHei in slamming Pelosi -- that the Congress has only had one five-day work week and that she seated Rep. Jefferson on a committee -- are likewise off base. To my knowledge, the Democratic House has already put in more five-day work weeks than the previous Republican House, which tended to put in about a one and a half day work week. And on the issue of "Dollar" Bill Jefferson, Reilly and VandeHei fail to mention that Pelosi stripped the Louisianian of his far more powerful and important position on the House Appropriations Committee during the last Congress, a fact that should certainly bear mentioning in any discussion about decisions about his committee placement (and he indeed needed to be placed on at least some committees, certainly in the absence of an indictment for his alleged improprieties).

And not only are these attacks largely off-base, they also are not resonating with the American public. The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll released today shows Speaker Pelosi's approval rating at 50 percent, with 31 percent disapproving. This is a slight decline for Pelosi from last month, when her approval spread was 54-25, but her current numbers are nonetheless significantly better than those currently held by President Bush (36 percent approve, 62 percent disapprove) and even the highest marks ever held by the last well-known Speaker, Newt Gingrich, whose top rating of 41 percent approval with 44 percent disapproval was achieved twice in 1998.

Yet for how important and meaningful these numbers are -- and they indeed are significant, both historically and currently -- measures of Pelosi's wide popularity within the American public are somewhat off topic. The fact is that this highly opinionated piece belongs not in the news section of a paper but rather in the Op-Ed section and, moreover, it might be warranted coming from a Republican member of Congress or a GOP activist but certainly not two reporters who profess to be non-partisan and unbiased.

Update [2007-2-27 1:10:17 by Jonathan Singer]: Of course I might also mention that Pelosi did follow through with her most notable campaign promises: passing the broad "Six for '06" agenda within the first 100 hours of the Congress.



Display:


Re: Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts .. (none / 0)

Look who the writers are.  Mike Allen??  Has that guy ever said anything positive about Democrats?  The Politico is trying to out do the NY Post, or now it even seems, the ComPost(yes it's a dig at the Washington Post).


John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:09:50 AM EST

Re: Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts .. (none / 0)

Exactly.  And that Jim VandeHei is the epitome of a mealy-mouthed, pampered, ex-fratboy puke.  Whenever he was on Hardball, the ego emanating from him just oozed right through the screen.


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:14:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Jim VandeHei (none / 0)

is also married to a former key staffer of Tom DeLay (IIRC).


by Lakid1995 on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 08:49:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts .. (none / 0)

Agree on VanDeHei's on-screen image: he was on C-Span regularly, usually uninterrupted. His body language was offensive; he seemed to be perched on a seat, looking down his nose as he spoke. I never saw him once that I didn't want to do something about that appearance. He had a big pulpit at the WaPo which he and the other principals at Politico.com are trying to replicate.


by Books Alive on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 09:18:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Distorts Facts, Falls Flat (3.00 / 1)

Can't recall who it was, but some blogger took the opportunity to tour VanDeHei's DC house when it was for sale some time ago and reported that the interior was basically a shrine to all things Bush.


by global yokel on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:25:44 AM EST

Re: Distorts Facts, Falls Flat (none / 0)

That doesn't suprise me.  Pelosi did what she said she would do.  She can't help if everything is stuck in the Senate.  The question I wonder, have they voted on anything in the Senate besides the non-binding resolution?


John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:51:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Distorts Facts, Falls Flat (none / 0)

Yup there was a diary on DKos awhile back about VanDeHei written by someone who toured VanDeHei's house during an Open House - and there was Republican memorabilia and Ronald Reagan mementos in some sort of shrine set-up in the house.

VanDeHei is a Republican hack.


by GregNYC on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 04:22:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Pelosi Falls Flat (none / 0)

Another failure is that she is distancing herself from the Murtha defund Iraq by training troops plan.  The whole Dem Party is full of stupid wimps.  If the REpublicans hadn't of imploded, they would still me a minority party. From their behavior, I think they still are.  This country's political system is in huge trouble.  Crazy people running the asylum and the Dems are their timid employees afraid to see the truth because they might have to do something about it.


by dkmich on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 05:41:16 AM EST

Some truth there, though (none / 0)

Content on the site has been distinctly thin. This is pretty much filler.

On closed rules - too early to say. There's some goo-goo bollocks in New Direction, setting a patently impossible standard.

On the other hand, based on the pre-publicity, one might have hoped she'd have been aiming for a higher standard than no worse than the GOP.

On the five day work week - again, I think Sixpack would have taken that to mean floor action five days a week - including committees is spinning - but these guys are pols, for God's sake.

Jefferson, though, is unforgivable. Small Business and Homeland Security were the most innocuous assignments Pelosi could have given him? Why give him anything? Why not Administration?

On the day when the Feds come a-knocking on Dollar Bill's door, none of the political rags will need filler!


by skeptic06 on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 07:42:48 AM EST

Pelosi Distorts Facts, Falls Flat (none / 0)

They should have refused to give Jefferson a committee assignment, much like they did Trafficant in the 1990's.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 08:57:44 AM EST

Re: Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts, F (none / 0)

I tried to register to leave a comment, and it won't accept my brand-new (confirmed) user name and / or password.

Isn't this kind of problem a late nineties thing? I haven't encountered a registration problem for at least six or seven years.

What a pathetic little site.


by Tod Westlake on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 09:52:13 AM EST

Re: Politico Smear-Job on Pelosi Distorts Facts, F (none / 0)

Check out writing a letter to a "journalist" on that website. It allows 200 characters (not 200 words, but 200 characters)!


by joyful alternative on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 02:07:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Pelosi's six for '06. (none / 0)

"Of course I might also mention that Pelosi did follow through with her most notable campaign promises: passing the broad "Six for '06" agenda within the first 100 hours of the Congress."

And we all know what impact that had on the body politic. The media is still talking about it. Not.


by joliepoint on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:03:29 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.